Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] fs: replace wq users and add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue() users

[Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>]

On Tue, 16 Sep 2025 10:29:03 +0200, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> Below is a summary of a discussion about the Workqueue API and cpu isolation
> considerations. Details and more information are available here:
> 
>         "workqueue: Always use wq_select_unbound_cpu() for WORK_CPU_UNBOUND."
>         https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250221112003.1dSuoGyc@linutronix.de/
> 
> === Current situation: problems ===
> 
> [...]

Applied to the vfs-6.18.workqueue branch of the vfs/vfs.git tree.
Patches in the vfs-6.18.workqueue branch should appear in linux-next soon.

Please report any outstanding bugs that were missed during review in a
new review to the original patch series allowing us to drop it.

It's encouraged to provide Acked-bys and Reviewed-bys even though the
patch has now been applied. If possible patch trailers will be updated.

Note that commit hashes shown below are subject to change due to rebase,
trailer updates or similar. If in doubt, please check the listed branch.

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git
branch: vfs-6.18.workqueue

[1/3] fs: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq
      https://git.kernel.org/vfs/vfs/c/08621f25a268
[2/3] fs: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq
      https://git.kernel.org/vfs/vfs/c/d33fa88429c5
[3/3] fs: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users
      https://git.kernel.org/vfs/vfs/c/13549bd48bbf