Re: [PATCH 2/8] fuse: flush pending fuse events before aborting the connection

Miklos Szeredi
2025-09-24T12:04:32Z

On Wed, 24 Sept 2025 at 00:34, Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> wrote:

> Conclusion: The loop is necessary to avoid softlockup warnings while the
> fuse requests are processed by the server, but it is not necessary to
> touch the watchdog in the loop body.

I'm still confused.

What is the kernel message you get?

"watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#X stuck for NNs!"

or

"INFO: task PROC blocked for more than NN seconds."

Thanks,
Miklos