From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: David Windsor <dwindsor@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
kpsingh@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, brauner@kernel.org,
jack@suse.cz, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Add dentry kfuncs for BPF LSM programs
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 01:29:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250925002901.GX39973@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEXv5_jveHxe9sT3BcQAuXEVjrXqiRpMvi6qyRv32oHXOq4M7g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 08:08:03PM -0400, David Windsor wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 7:55 PM Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 07:24:33PM -0400, David Windsor wrote:
> > > Add six new BPF kfuncs that enable BPF LSM programs to safely interact
> > > with dentry objects:
> > >
> > > - bpf_dget(): Acquire reference on dentry
> > > - bpf_dput(): Release reference on dentry
> > > - bpf_dget_parent(): Get referenced parent dentry
> > > - bpf_d_find_alias(): Find referenced alias dentry for inode
> > > - bpf_file_dentry(): Get dentry from file
> > > - bpf_file_vfsmount(): Get vfsmount from file
> > >
> > > All kfuncs are currently restricted to BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM programs.
> >
> > You have an interesting definition of safety.
> >
> > We are *NOT* letting random out-of-tree code play around with the
> > lifetime rules for core objects.
> >
>
> File references are already exposed to bpf (bpf_get_task_exe_file,
> bpf_put_file) with the same KF_ACQUIRE|KF_RELEASE semantics. These
> follow the same pattern and are also LSM-only.
You can safely clone and retain file references. You can't do that
to dentries unless you are guaranteed an active reference to superblock
to stay around for as long as you are retaining those. Note that
LSM hooks might be called with ->s_umount held by caller, so the locking
environment for superblocks depends upon the hook in question.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-25 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-24 23:24 [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpf: Add more dentry kfuncs for BPF LSM programs David Windsor
2025-09-24 23:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Add " David Windsor
2025-09-24 23:55 ` Al Viro
2025-09-25 0:08 ` David Windsor
2025-09-25 0:29 ` Al Viro [this message]
2025-09-25 0:44 ` David Windsor
2025-09-25 0:47 ` Al Viro
2025-09-25 0:56 ` David Windsor
2025-09-29 8:24 ` Christian Brauner
2025-09-24 23:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add tests for dentry kfuncs David Windsor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250925002901.GX39973@ZenIV \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dwindsor@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).