* [PATCH] isofs: fix inode leak caused by disconnected dentries from exportfs
@ 2025-10-01 9:43 Deepanshu Kartikey
2025-10-01 12:26 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Deepanshu Kartikey @ 2025-10-01 9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jack, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel
Cc: Deepanshu Kartikey, syzbot+1d79ebe5383fc016cf07
When open_by_handle_at() is used with iso9660 filesystems, exportfs
creates disconnected dentries during file handle resolution. If the
operation fails (e.g., with -ESTALE during reconnect_path()), these
dentries remain cached with their associated inodes.
During unmount, shrink_dcache_for_umount() does not fully evict these
disconnected dentries, leaving their inodes with non-zero reference
counts. This triggers the "VFS: Busy inodes after unmount" warning
and causes inode leaks that accumulate across mount/unmount cycles.
The issue occurs because:
1. open_by_handle_at() calls exportfs_decode_fh_raw() to resolve
file handles
2. For iso9660 with Joliet extensions, this creates disconnected
dentries for both primary (iso9660) and secondary (Joliet) root
inodes
3. When path reconnection fails with -ESTALE, the dentries are left
in DCACHE_DISCONNECTED state
4. shrink_dcache_for_umount() in generic_shutdown_super() does not
aggressively evict these disconnected dentries
5. The associated inodes (typically root inodes 1792 and 1807)
remain with i_count=1, triggering the busy inode check
Add explicit shrink_dcache_sb() call in isofs_put_super() to ensure
all cached dentries, including disconnected ones created by exportfs
operations, are released before the superblock is destroyed.
Reported-by: syzbot+1d79ebe5383fc016cf07@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Tested-by: syzbot+1d79ebe5383fc016cf07@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
---
fs/isofs/inode.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/isofs/inode.c b/fs/isofs/inode.c
index 6f0e6b19383c..bee410705442 100644
--- a/fs/isofs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/isofs/inode.c
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ static int isofs_dentry_cmp_ms(const struct dentry *dentry,
static void isofs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
{
struct isofs_sb_info *sbi = ISOFS_SB(sb);
+ shrink_dcache_sb(sb);
#ifdef CONFIG_JOLIET
unload_nls(sbi->s_nls_iocharset);
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] isofs: fix inode leak caused by disconnected dentries from exportfs
2025-10-01 9:43 Deepanshu Kartikey
@ 2025-10-01 12:26 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2025-10-01 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Deepanshu Kartikey
Cc: jack, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, syzbot+1d79ebe5383fc016cf07
On Wed 01-10-25 15:13:10, Deepanshu Kartikey wrote:
> When open_by_handle_at() is used with iso9660 filesystems, exportfs
> creates disconnected dentries during file handle resolution. If the
> operation fails (e.g., with -ESTALE during reconnect_path()), these
> dentries remain cached with their associated inodes.
>
> During unmount, shrink_dcache_for_umount() does not fully evict these
> disconnected dentries, leaving their inodes with non-zero reference
> counts. This triggers the "VFS: Busy inodes after unmount" warning
> and causes inode leaks that accumulate across mount/unmount cycles.
>
> The issue occurs because:
> 1. open_by_handle_at() calls exportfs_decode_fh_raw() to resolve
> file handles
> 2. For iso9660 with Joliet extensions, this creates disconnected
> dentries for both primary (iso9660) and secondary (Joliet) root
> inodes
> 3. When path reconnection fails with -ESTALE, the dentries are left
> in DCACHE_DISCONNECTED state
True, but when reconnection fails, exportfs_decode_fh_raw() calls dput() on
the created dentry and dput() immediately destroys DCACHE_DISCONNECTED
dentries. So I'm not following how these dentries could still survive until
umount(). Can you please explain?
> 4. shrink_dcache_for_umount() in generic_shutdown_super() does not
> aggressively evict these disconnected dentries
> 5. The associated inodes (typically root inodes 1792 and 1807)
> remain with i_count=1, triggering the busy inode check
>
> Add explicit shrink_dcache_sb() call in isofs_put_super() to ensure
> all cached dentries, including disconnected ones created by exportfs
> operations, are released before the superblock is destroyed.
This is almost certainly a wrong way of fixing the problem. First we need
to better understand why DCACHE_DISCONNECTED aren't getting properly
evicted...
Honza
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+1d79ebe5383fc016cf07@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Tested-by: syzbot+1d79ebe5383fc016cf07@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/isofs/inode.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/isofs/inode.c b/fs/isofs/inode.c
> index 6f0e6b19383c..bee410705442 100644
> --- a/fs/isofs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/isofs/inode.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ static int isofs_dentry_cmp_ms(const struct dentry *dentry,
> static void isofs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
> {
> struct isofs_sb_info *sbi = ISOFS_SB(sb);
> + shrink_dcache_sb(sb);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_JOLIET
> unload_nls(sbi->s_nls_iocharset);
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] isofs: fix inode leak caused by disconnected dentries from exportfs
@ 2025-10-01 12:56 Deepanshu Kartikey
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Deepanshu Kartikey @ 2025-10-01 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jack; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel
Hi Jan,
Thank you for the review.
You're right - I need to investigate further why these dentries survive until unmount if dput() should destroy DCACHE_DISCONNECTED dentries immediately.
I'll add more detailed tracing to understand the actual reference counting and dentry state throughout the lifecycle.
I may have misdiagnosed the root cause even though the fix addresses the symptom
Best Regards
Deepanshu kartikey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] isofs: fix inode leak caused by disconnected dentries from exportfs
@ 2025-10-01 20:27 Deepanshu Kartikey
2025-10-02 16:08 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Deepanshu Kartikey @ 2025-10-01 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jack; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel
Hi Jan,
Thank you for the review. You're absolutely right - my initial explanation was incorrect. I've done extensive debugging to understand the actual mechanism causing the leak.
Root Cause Analysis
===================
The leak occurs specifically with CONFIG_JOLIET=y through the following sequence:
1. Joliet Root Switching During Mount
--------------------------------------
In isofs_fill_super(), when Joliet extensions are detected:
- Primary root inode 1792 is created with i_count=1, i_nlink=3
- During Joliet switching, iput(inode) is called on inode 1792
- i_count decrements to 0, but generic_drop_inode() returns false (i_nlink=3 > 0)
- Inode 1792 remains cached at i_count=0
- New Joliet root inode 1920 is created and attached to sb->s_root
Debugging output:
[9.653617] isofs: switching roots, about to iput ino=1792, i_count=1
[9.653676] isofs: after iput, getting new root
[9.653880] isofs: old inode after iput ino=1792, i_count=0, i_nlink=3
[9.654219] isofs: got new root ino=1920, i_count=1
2. open_by_handle_at() Triggers Reconnection
---------------------------------------------
When the system call attempts to resolve a file handle:
- exportfs_decode_fh_raw() calls fh_to_dentry() which returns inode 1856
- The dentry is marked DCACHE_DISCONNECTED
- reconnect_path() is invoked to connect the path to root
- This calls reconnect_one() to walk up the directory tree
3. Reference Accumulation in reconnect_one()
---------------------------------------------
I instrumented reconnect_one() to track dentry reference counts:
[8.010398] reconnect_one: called for inode 1856
[8.010735] isofs: __isofs_iget got inode 1792, i_count=1
[8.011041] After fh_to_parent: d_count=1
[8.011319] After exportfs_get_name: d_count=2
[8.011769] After lookup_one_unlocked: d_count=3
The parent dentry (inode 1792) accumulates 3 references:
1. Initial reference from fh_to_parent()
2. Additional reference taken by exportfs_get_name()
3. Another reference taken by lookup_one_unlocked()
Then lookup_one_unlocked() creates a dentry for inode 1807:
[8.015179] isofs: __isofs_iget got inode 1807, i_count=1
[8.016169] lookup returns tmp (inode 1807), d_count=1
The code enters the tmp != dentry branch and calls dput(tmp), then goes to
out_reconnected.
4. Insufficient Cleanup
-----------------------
For inode 1807, I traced through dput():
[10.083359] fast_dput: lockref_put_return returned 0
[10.083699] fast_dput: RETAINING dentry for inode 1807, d_flags=0x240043
The dentry refcount goes to 0, but retain_dentry() returns true because of
the DCACHE_REFERENCED flag (0x40 in 0x240043). The dentry is kept in cache
with refcount 0, still holding the inode reference.
For inode 1792:
[10.084125] fast_dput: lockref_put_return returned 2
At out_reconnected, only one dput(parent) is called, decrementing from 3 to 2.
Two references remain leaked.
5. Unmount Failure
------------------
At unmount time:
- shrink_dcache_for_umount() doesn't evict dentries with positive refcounts (1792)
- Doesn't aggressively evict retained dentries with refcount 0 (1807)
- Both inodes appear as leaked with i_count=1
[10.155385] LEAKED INODE: ino=1807, i_count=1, i_state=0x0, i_nlink=1
[10.155604] LEAKED INODE: ino=1792, i_count=1, i_state=0x0, i_nlink=1
Why shrink_dcache_sb() Works
=============================
Calling shrink_dcache_sb() in isofs_put_super() forces eviction of:
- Dentries with extra references that weren't properly released
- Retained dentries sitting in cache at refcount 0
This ensures cleanup happens before the superblock is destroyed.
Open Questions
==============
1. Are exportfs_get_name() and lookup_one_unlocked() supposed to take
references to the parent dentry that the caller must release? Should
reconnect_one() be calling dput(parent) multiple times, or are these
functions leaking references?
2. Is adding shrink_dcache_sb() in put_super() the appropriate fix, or
should this be handled in the reconnection error path when
reconnect_one() fails?
3. Does this indicate a broader issue with how exportfs handles parent
dentry references during failed path reconnections that might affect
other filesystems?
I can investigate further into the implementation of exportfs_get_name()
and lookup_one_unlocked() to understand where exactly the extra references
are taken if that would be helpful.
Best regards,
Deepanshu Kartikey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] isofs: fix inode leak caused by disconnected dentries from exportfs
2025-10-01 20:27 [PATCH] isofs: fix inode leak caused by disconnected dentries from exportfs Deepanshu Kartikey
@ 2025-10-02 16:08 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2025-10-02 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Deepanshu Kartikey; +Cc: jack, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel
Hello,
On Thu 02-10-25 01:57:13, Deepanshu Kartikey wrote:
> Thank you for the review. You're absolutely right - my initial
> explanation was incorrect. I've done extensive debugging to understand
> the actual mechanism causing the leak.
Hrm, the text below looks like it was generated by some AI agent :) More
importantly it still doesn't really explain the underlying cause of the
leak - it is fine to use AI for debugging but then one should get his own
understanding of the situation. As I was curious about the root cause, I
did the debugging myself and [1] has the proper analysis of the problem and
the fix.
Honza
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251002155506.10755-2-jack@suse.cz/
>
> Root Cause Analysis
> ===================
>
> The leak occurs specifically with CONFIG_JOLIET=y through the following sequence:
>
> 1. Joliet Root Switching During Mount
> --------------------------------------
>
> In isofs_fill_super(), when Joliet extensions are detected:
> - Primary root inode 1792 is created with i_count=1, i_nlink=3
> - During Joliet switching, iput(inode) is called on inode 1792
> - i_count decrements to 0, but generic_drop_inode() returns false (i_nlink=3 > 0)
> - Inode 1792 remains cached at i_count=0
> - New Joliet root inode 1920 is created and attached to sb->s_root
>
> Debugging output:
> [9.653617] isofs: switching roots, about to iput ino=1792, i_count=1
> [9.653676] isofs: after iput, getting new root
> [9.653880] isofs: old inode after iput ino=1792, i_count=0, i_nlink=3
> [9.654219] isofs: got new root ino=1920, i_count=1
>
> 2. open_by_handle_at() Triggers Reconnection
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> When the system call attempts to resolve a file handle:
> - exportfs_decode_fh_raw() calls fh_to_dentry() which returns inode 1856
> - The dentry is marked DCACHE_DISCONNECTED
> - reconnect_path() is invoked to connect the path to root
> - This calls reconnect_one() to walk up the directory tree
>
> 3. Reference Accumulation in reconnect_one()
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> I instrumented reconnect_one() to track dentry reference counts:
>
> [8.010398] reconnect_one: called for inode 1856
> [8.010735] isofs: __isofs_iget got inode 1792, i_count=1
> [8.011041] After fh_to_parent: d_count=1
> [8.011319] After exportfs_get_name: d_count=2
> [8.011769] After lookup_one_unlocked: d_count=3
>
> The parent dentry (inode 1792) accumulates 3 references:
> 1. Initial reference from fh_to_parent()
> 2. Additional reference taken by exportfs_get_name()
> 3. Another reference taken by lookup_one_unlocked()
>
> Then lookup_one_unlocked() creates a dentry for inode 1807:
> [8.015179] isofs: __isofs_iget got inode 1807, i_count=1
> [8.016169] lookup returns tmp (inode 1807), d_count=1
>
> The code enters the tmp != dentry branch and calls dput(tmp), then goes to
> out_reconnected.
>
> 4. Insufficient Cleanup
> -----------------------
>
> For inode 1807, I traced through dput():
> [10.083359] fast_dput: lockref_put_return returned 0
> [10.083699] fast_dput: RETAINING dentry for inode 1807, d_flags=0x240043
>
> The dentry refcount goes to 0, but retain_dentry() returns true because of
> the DCACHE_REFERENCED flag (0x40 in 0x240043). The dentry is kept in cache
> with refcount 0, still holding the inode reference.
>
> For inode 1792:
> [10.084125] fast_dput: lockref_put_return returned 2
>
> At out_reconnected, only one dput(parent) is called, decrementing from 3 to 2.
> Two references remain leaked.
>
> 5. Unmount Failure
> ------------------
>
> At unmount time:
> - shrink_dcache_for_umount() doesn't evict dentries with positive refcounts (1792)
> - Doesn't aggressively evict retained dentries with refcount 0 (1807)
> - Both inodes appear as leaked with i_count=1
>
> [10.155385] LEAKED INODE: ino=1807, i_count=1, i_state=0x0, i_nlink=1
> [10.155604] LEAKED INODE: ino=1792, i_count=1, i_state=0x0, i_nlink=1
>
> Why shrink_dcache_sb() Works
> =============================
>
> Calling shrink_dcache_sb() in isofs_put_super() forces eviction of:
> - Dentries with extra references that weren't properly released
> - Retained dentries sitting in cache at refcount 0
>
> This ensures cleanup happens before the superblock is destroyed.
>
> Open Questions
> ==============
>
> 1. Are exportfs_get_name() and lookup_one_unlocked() supposed to take
> references to the parent dentry that the caller must release? Should
> reconnect_one() be calling dput(parent) multiple times, or are these
> functions leaking references?
>
> 2. Is adding shrink_dcache_sb() in put_super() the appropriate fix, or
> should this be handled in the reconnection error path when
> reconnect_one() fails?
>
> 3. Does this indicate a broader issue with how exportfs handles parent
> dentry references during failed path reconnections that might affect
> other filesystems?
>
> I can investigate further into the implementation of exportfs_get_name()
> and lookup_one_unlocked() to understand where exactly the extra references
> are taken if that would be helpful.
>
> Best regards,
> Deepanshu Kartikey
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] isofs: fix inode leak caused by disconnected dentries from exportfs
@ 2025-10-02 23:23 Deepanshu Kartikey
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Deepanshu Kartikey @ 2025-10-02 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jack; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel
Thank you for debugging this properly and providing the correct analysis. I clearly missed the actual root cause.
I'll study your patch to understand what I got wrong.
Best regards,
Deepanshu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-02 23:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-10-01 20:27 [PATCH] isofs: fix inode leak caused by disconnected dentries from exportfs Deepanshu Kartikey
2025-10-02 16:08 ` Jan Kara
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-10-02 23:23 Deepanshu Kartikey
2025-10-01 12:56 Deepanshu Kartikey
2025-10-01 9:43 Deepanshu Kartikey
2025-10-01 12:26 ` Jan Kara
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).