linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: alexjlzheng@gmail.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: move prefaulting out of hot write path
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 08:01:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251009150125.GD6188@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251009090851.2811395-1-alexjlzheng@tencent.com>

On Thu, Oct 09, 2025 at 05:08:51PM +0800, alexjlzheng@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
> 
> Prefaulting the write source buffer incurs an extra userspace access
> in the common fast path. Make iomap_write_iter() consistent with
> generic_perform_write(): only touch userspace an extra time when
> copy_folio_from_iter_atomic() has failed to make progress.
> 
> This patch is inspired by commit 665575cff098 ("filemap: move
> prefaulting out of hot write path").

Seems fine to me, but I wonder if dhansen has any thoughts about this
patch ... which exactly mirrors one he sent eight months ago?

--D

> Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
> ---
>  fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> index 8b847a1e27f1..6e6573fce78a 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> @@ -972,21 +972,6 @@ static int iomap_write_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct iov_iter *i,
>  		if (bytes > iomap_length(iter))
>  			bytes = iomap_length(iter);
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * Bring in the user page that we'll copy from _first_.
> -		 * Otherwise there's a nasty deadlock on copying from the
> -		 * same page as we're writing to, without it being marked
> -		 * up-to-date.
> -		 *
> -		 * For async buffered writes the assumption is that the user
> -		 * page has already been faulted in. This can be optimized by
> -		 * faulting the user page.
> -		 */
> -		if (unlikely(fault_in_iov_iter_readable(i, bytes) == bytes)) {
> -			status = -EFAULT;
> -			break;
> -		}
> -
>  		status = iomap_write_begin(iter, write_ops, &folio, &offset,
>  				&bytes);
>  		if (unlikely(status)) {
> @@ -1001,6 +986,12 @@ static int iomap_write_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct iov_iter *i,
>  		if (mapping_writably_mapped(mapping))
>  			flush_dcache_folio(folio);
>  
> +		/*
> +		 * Faults here on mmap()s can recurse into arbitrary
> +		 * filesystem code. Lots of locks are held that can
> +		 * deadlock. Use an atomic copy to avoid deadlocking
> +		 * in page fault handling.
> +		 */
>  		copied = copy_folio_from_iter_atomic(folio, offset, bytes, i);
>  		written = iomap_write_end(iter, bytes, copied, folio) ?
>  			  copied : 0;
> @@ -1039,6 +1030,16 @@ static int iomap_write_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct iov_iter *i,
>  				bytes = copied;
>  				goto retry;
>  			}
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * 'folio' is now unlocked and faults on it can be
> +			 * handled. Ensure forward progress by trying to
> +			 * fault it in now.
> +			 */
> +			if (fault_in_iov_iter_readable(i, bytes) == bytes) {
> +				status = -EFAULT;
> +				break;
> +			}
>  		} else {
>  			total_written += written;
>  			iomap_iter_advance(iter, &written);
> -- 
> 2.49.0
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-09 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-09  9:08 [PATCH] iomap: move prefaulting out of hot write path alexjlzheng
2025-10-09 15:01 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-10-09 15:15   ` Dave Hansen
2025-10-10  2:04     ` Jinliang Zheng
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-07-26  9:09 alexjlzheng
2025-07-27 22:10 ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251009150125.GD6188@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexjlzheng@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexjlzheng@tencent.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).