From: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
To: brauner@kernel.org
Cc: djwong@kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, bfoster@redhat.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH v1 8/9] iomap: use find_next_bit() for dirty bitmap scanning
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 15:56:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251009225611.3744728-9-joannelkoong@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251009225611.3744728-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Use find_next_bit()/find_next_zero_bit() for iomap dirty bitmap
scanning. This uses __ffs() internally and is more efficient for
finding the next dirty or clean bit than manually iterating through the
bitmap range testing every bit.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
---
fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
index 66c47404787f..37d2b76ca230 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@ -76,15 +76,49 @@ static void iomap_set_range_uptodate(struct folio *folio, size_t off,
folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
}
-static inline bool ifs_block_is_dirty(struct folio *folio,
- struct iomap_folio_state *ifs, int block)
+/**
+* ifs_next_dirty_block - find the next dirty block in the folio
+* @folio: The folio
+* @start_blk: Block number to begin searching at
+* @end_blk: Last block number (inclusive) to search
+*
+* If no dirty block is found, this will return end_blk + 1.
+*/
+static unsigned ifs_next_dirty_block(struct folio *folio,
+ unsigned start_blk, unsigned end_blk)
{
+ struct iomap_folio_state *ifs = folio->private;
struct inode *inode = folio->mapping->host;
- unsigned int blks_per_folio = i_blocks_per_folio(inode, folio);
+ unsigned int blks = i_blocks_per_folio(inode, folio);
+
+ return find_next_bit(ifs->state, blks + end_blk + 1,
+ blks + start_blk) - blks;
+}
+
+/**
+* ifs_next_clean_block - find the next clean block in the folio
+* @folio: The folio
+* @start_blk: Block number to begin searching at
+* @end_blk: Last block number (inclusive) to search
+*
+* If no clean block is found, this will return end_blk + 1.
+*/
+static unsigned ifs_next_clean_block(struct folio *folio,
+ unsigned start_blk, unsigned end_blk)
+{
+ struct iomap_folio_state *ifs = folio->private;
+ struct inode *inode = folio->mapping->host;
+ unsigned int blks = i_blocks_per_folio(inode, folio);
- return test_bit(block + blks_per_folio, ifs->state);
+ return find_next_zero_bit(ifs->state, blks + end_blk + 1,
+ blks + start_blk) - blks;
}
+#define for_each_clean_block(folio, blk, last_blk) \
+ for ((blk) = ifs_next_clean_block((folio), (blk), (last_blk)); \
+ (blk) <= (last_blk); \
+ (blk) = ifs_next_clean_block((folio), (blk) + 1, (last_blk)))
+
static unsigned ifs_find_dirty_range(struct folio *folio,
struct iomap_folio_state *ifs, loff_t *range_start,
loff_t range_end)
@@ -94,18 +128,17 @@ static unsigned ifs_find_dirty_range(struct folio *folio,
offset_in_folio(folio, *range_start) >> inode->i_blkbits;
unsigned end_blk = min_not_zero(
offset_in_folio(folio, range_end) >> inode->i_blkbits,
- i_blocks_per_folio(inode, folio));
- unsigned nblks = 1;
+ i_blocks_per_folio(inode, folio)) - 1;
+ unsigned nblks;
- while (!ifs_block_is_dirty(folio, ifs, start_blk))
- if (++start_blk == end_blk)
- return 0;
-
- while (start_blk + nblks < end_blk) {
- if (!ifs_block_is_dirty(folio, ifs, start_blk + nblks))
- break;
- nblks++;
- }
+ start_blk = ifs_next_dirty_block(folio, start_blk, end_blk);
+ if (start_blk > end_blk)
+ return 0;
+ else if (start_blk == end_blk)
+ nblks = 1;
+ else
+ nblks = ifs_next_clean_block(folio, start_blk + 1, end_blk)
+ - start_blk;
*range_start = folio_pos(folio) + (start_blk << inode->i_blkbits);
return nblks << inode->i_blkbits;
@@ -1102,7 +1135,7 @@ static void iomap_write_delalloc_ifs_punch(struct inode *inode,
struct folio *folio, loff_t start_byte, loff_t end_byte,
struct iomap *iomap, iomap_punch_t punch)
{
- unsigned int first_blk, last_blk, i;
+ unsigned int first_blk, last_blk;
loff_t last_byte;
u8 blkbits = inode->i_blkbits;
struct iomap_folio_state *ifs;
@@ -1121,11 +1154,9 @@ static void iomap_write_delalloc_ifs_punch(struct inode *inode,
folio_pos(folio) + folio_size(folio) - 1);
first_blk = offset_in_folio(folio, start_byte) >> blkbits;
last_blk = offset_in_folio(folio, last_byte) >> blkbits;
- for (i = first_blk; i <= last_blk; i++) {
- if (!ifs_block_is_dirty(folio, ifs, i))
- punch(inode, folio_pos(folio) + (i << blkbits),
- 1 << blkbits, iomap);
- }
+ for_each_clean_block(folio, first_blk, last_blk)
+ punch(inode, folio_pos(folio) + (first_blk << blkbits),
+ 1 << blkbits, iomap);
}
static void iomap_write_delalloc_punch(struct inode *inode, struct folio *folio,
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-09 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-09 22:56 [PATCH v1 0/9] iomap: buffered io changes Joanne Koong
2025-10-09 22:56 ` [PATCH v1 1/9] iomap: account for unaligned end offsets when truncating read range Joanne Koong
2025-10-13 3:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-09 22:56 ` [PATCH v1 2/9] docs: document iomap writeback's iomap_finish_folio_write() requirement Joanne Koong
2025-10-13 3:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-09 22:56 ` [PATCH v1 3/9] iomap: optimize pending async writeback accounting Joanne Koong
2025-10-13 3:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-09 22:56 ` [PATCH v1 4/9] iomap: simplify ->read_folio_range() error handling for reads Joanne Koong
2025-10-13 3:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-09 22:56 ` [PATCH v1 5/9] iomap: simplify when reads can be skipped for writes Joanne Koong
2025-10-13 3:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-09 22:56 ` [PATCH v1 6/9] iomap: optimize reads for non-block-aligned writes Joanne Koong
2025-10-13 3:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-14 0:04 ` Joanne Koong
2025-10-14 4:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-09 22:56 ` [PATCH v1 7/9] iomap: use loff_t for file positions and offsets in writeback code Joanne Koong
2025-10-13 3:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-09 22:56 ` Joanne Koong [this message]
2025-10-13 3:13 ` [PATCH v1 8/9] iomap: use find_next_bit() for dirty bitmap scanning Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-09 22:56 ` [PATCH v1 9/9] iomap: use find_next_bit() for uptodate " Joanne Koong
2025-10-13 3:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251009225611.3744728-9-joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--to=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).