linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iomap: add IOMAP_DIO_FSBLOCK_ALIGNED flag
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 08:24:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251031152406.GO6174@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251031131045.1613229-2-hch@lst.de>

On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 02:10:26PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> 
> Btrfs requires all of its bios to be fs block aligned, normally it's
> totally fine but with the incoming block size larger than page size
> (bs > ps) support, the requirement is no longer met for direct IOs.
> 
> Because iomap_dio_bio_iter() calls bio_iov_iter_get_pages(), only
> requiring alignment to be bdev_logical_block_size().
> 
> In the real world that value is either 512 or 4K, on 4K page sized
> systems it means bio_iov_iter_get_pages() can break the bio at any page
> boundary, breaking btrfs' requirement for bs > ps cases.
> 
> To address this problem, introduce a new public iomap dio flag,
> IOMAP_DIO_FSBLOCK_ALIGNED.
> 
> When calling __iomap_dio_rw() with that new flag, iomap_dio::flags will
> inherit that new flag, and iomap_dio_bio_iter() will take fs block size
> into the calculation of the alignment, and pass the alignment to
> bio_iov_iter_get_pages(), respecting the fs block size requirement.
> 
> The initial user of this flag will be btrfs, which needs to calculate the
> checksum for direct read and thus requires the biovec to be fs block
> aligned for the incoming bs > ps support.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> Reviewed-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
> [hch: also align pos/len, incorporate the trace flags from Darrick]
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

LGTM
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> ---
>  fs/iomap/direct-io.c  | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>  fs/iomap/trace.h      |  7 ++++---
>  include/linux/iomap.h |  8 ++++++++
>  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> index 5d5d63efbd57..13def8418659 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> @@ -336,8 +336,18 @@ static int iomap_dio_bio_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct iomap_dio *dio)
>  	int nr_pages, ret = 0;
>  	u64 copied = 0;
>  	size_t orig_count;
> +	unsigned int alignment;
>  
> -	if ((pos | length) & (bdev_logical_block_size(iomap->bdev) - 1))
> +	/*
> +	 * File systems that write out of place and always allocate new blocks
> +	 * need each bio to be block aligned as that's the unit of allocation.
> +	 */
> +	if (dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_FSBLOCK_ALIGNED)
> +		alignment = fs_block_size;
> +	else
> +		alignment = bdev_logical_block_size(iomap->bdev);
> +
> +	if ((pos | length) & (alignment - 1))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_WRITE) {
> @@ -434,7 +444,7 @@ static int iomap_dio_bio_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct iomap_dio *dio)
>  		bio->bi_end_io = iomap_dio_bio_end_io;
>  
>  		ret = bio_iov_iter_get_pages(bio, dio->submit.iter,
> -				bdev_logical_block_size(iomap->bdev) - 1);
> +					     alignment - 1);
>  		if (unlikely(ret)) {
>  			/*
>  			 * We have to stop part way through an IO. We must fall
> @@ -639,6 +649,9 @@ __iomap_dio_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
>  	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)
>  		iomi.flags |= IOMAP_NOWAIT;
>  
> +	if (dio_flags & IOMAP_DIO_FSBLOCK_ALIGNED)
> +		dio->flags |= IOMAP_DIO_FSBLOCK_ALIGNED;
> +
>  	if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == READ) {
>  		/* reads can always complete inline */
>  		dio->flags |= IOMAP_DIO_INLINE_COMP;
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/trace.h b/fs/iomap/trace.h
> index a61c1dae4742..532787277b16 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/trace.h
> +++ b/fs/iomap/trace.h
> @@ -122,9 +122,10 @@ DEFINE_RANGE_EVENT(iomap_zero_iter);
>  
>  
>  #define IOMAP_DIO_STRINGS \
> -	{IOMAP_DIO_FORCE_WAIT,	"DIO_FORCE_WAIT" }, \
> -	{IOMAP_DIO_OVERWRITE_ONLY, "DIO_OVERWRITE_ONLY" }, \
> -	{IOMAP_DIO_PARTIAL,	"DIO_PARTIAL" }
> +	{IOMAP_DIO_FORCE_WAIT,		"DIO_FORCE_WAIT" }, \
> +	{IOMAP_DIO_OVERWRITE_ONLY,	"DIO_OVERWRITE_ONLY" }, \
> +	{IOMAP_DIO_PARTIAL,		"DIO_PARTIAL" }, \
> +	{IOMAP_DIO_FSBLOCK_ALIGNED,	"DIO_FSBLOCK_ALIGNED" }
>  
>  DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(iomap_class,
>  	TP_PROTO(struct inode *inode, struct iomap *iomap),
> diff --git a/include/linux/iomap.h b/include/linux/iomap.h
> index 73dceabc21c8..4da13fe24ce8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iomap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iomap.h
> @@ -518,6 +518,14 @@ struct iomap_dio_ops {
>   */
>  #define IOMAP_DIO_PARTIAL		(1 << 2)
>  
> +/*
> + * Ensure each bio is aligned to fs block size.
> + *
> + * For filesystems which need to calculate/verify the checksum of each fs
> + * block. Otherwise they may not be able to handle unaligned bios.
> + */
> +#define IOMAP_DIO_FSBLOCK_ALIGNED	(1 << 3)
> +
>  ssize_t iomap_dio_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
>  		const struct iomap_ops *ops, const struct iomap_dio_ops *dops,
>  		unsigned int dio_flags, void *private, size_t done_before);
> -- 
> 2.47.3
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-31 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-31 13:10 alloc misaligned vectors for zoned XFS v2 Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31 13:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] iomap: add IOMAP_DIO_FSBLOCK_ALIGNED flag Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-31 15:24   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-10-31 13:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: support sub-block aligned vectors in always COW mode Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-05 12:09 ` alloc misaligned vectors for zoned XFS v2 Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251031152406.GO6174@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).