linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 syzbot+1957b26299cf3ff7890c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] ns: fixes for namespace iteration and active reference counting
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 09:41:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251110-elastisch-endeffekt-747abc5a614a@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251109225528.9063-1-hdanton@sina.com>

On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 06:55:26AM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Nov 2025 22:11:21 +0100 Christian Brauner wrote:
> > * Make sure to initialize the active reference count for the initial
> >   network namespace and prevent __ns_common_init() from returning too
> >   early.
> > 
> > * Make sure that passive reference counts are dropped outside of rcu
> >   read locks as some namespaces such as the mount namespace do in fact
> >   sleep when putting the last reference.
> > 
> > * The setns() system call supports:
> > 
> >   (1) namespace file descriptors (nsfd)
> >   (2) process file descriptors (pidfd)
> > 
> >   When using nsfds the namespaces will remain active because they are
> >   pinned by the vfs. However, when pidfds are used things are more
> >   complicated.
> > 
> >   When the target task exits and passes through exit_nsproxy_namespaces()
> >   or is reaped and thus also passes through exit_cred_namespaces() after
> >   the setns()'ing task has called prepare_nsset() but before the active
> >   reference count of the set of namespaces it wants to setns() to might
> >   have been dropped already:
> > 
> >     P1                                                              P2
> > 
> >     pid_p1 = clone(CLONE_NEWUSER | CLONE_NEWNET | CLONE_NEWNS)
> >                                                                     pidfd = pidfd_open(pid_p1)
> >                                                                     setns(pidfd, CLONE_NEWUSER | CLONE_NEWNET | CLONE_NEWNS)
> >                                                                     prepare_nsset()
> > 
> >     exit(0)
> >     // ns->__ns_active_ref        == 1
> >     // parent_ns->__ns_active_ref == 1
> >     -> exit_nsproxy_namespaces()
> >     -> exit_cred_namespaces()
> > 
> >     // ns_active_ref_put() will also put
> >     // the reference on the owner of the
> >     // namespace. If the only reason the
> >     // owning namespace was alive was
> >     // because it was a parent of @ns
> >     // it's active reference count now goes
> >     // to zero... --------------------------------
> >     //                                           |
> >     // ns->__ns_active_ref        == 0           |
> >     // parent_ns->__ns_active_ref == 0           |
> >                                                  |                  commit_nsset()
> >                                                  -----------------> // If setns()
> >                                                                     // now manages to install the namespaces
> >                                                                     // it will call ns_active_ref_get()
> >                                                                     // on them thus bumping the active reference
> >                                                                     // count from zero again but without also
> >                                                                     // taking the required reference on the owner.
> >                                                                     // Thus we get:
> >                                                                     //
> >                                                                     // ns->__ns_active_ref        == 1
> >                                                                     // parent_ns->__ns_active_ref == 0
> > 
> >     When later someone does ns_active_ref_put() on @ns it will underflow
> >     parent_ns->__ns_active_ref leading to a splat from our asserts
> >     thinking there are still active references when in fact the counter
> >     just underflowed.
> > 
> >   So resurrect the ownership chain if necessary as well. If the caller
> >   succeeded to grab passive references to the set of namespaces the
> >   setns() should simply succeed even if the target task exists or gets
> >   reaped in the meantime.
> > 
> >   The race is rare and can only be triggered when using pidfs to setns()
> >   to namespaces. Also note that active reference on initial namespaces are
> >   nops.
> > 
> >   Since we now always handle parent references directly we can drop
> >   ns_ref_active_get_owner() when adding a namespace to a namespace tree.
> >   This is now all handled uniformly in the places where the new namespaces
> >   actually become active.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >
> FYI namespace-6.19.fixes failed to survive the syzbot test [1].
> 
> [1] Subject: Re: [syzbot] [lsm?] WARNING in put_cred_rcu
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/690eedba.a70a0220.22f260.0075.GAE@google.com/

This used a stale branch that existed for testing:

Tested on:

commit:         00f5a3b5 DO NOT MERGE - This is purely for testing a b..

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

git tree:       https://github.com/brauner/linux.git namespace-6.19.fixes
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=17a46a58580000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=e31f5f45f87b6763
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=553c4078ab14e3cf3358
compiler:       Debian clang version 20.1.8 (++20250708063551+0c9f909b7976-1~exp1~20250708183702.136), Debian LLD 20.1.8

Note: no patches were applied.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-10  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-09 21:11 [PATCH 0/8] ns: fixes for namespace iteration and active reference counting Christian Brauner
2025-11-09 21:11 ` [PATCH 1/8] ns: don't skip active reference count initialization Christian Brauner
2025-11-09 21:11 ` [PATCH 2/8] ns: don't increment or decrement initial namespaces Christian Brauner
2025-11-09 21:11 ` [PATCH 3/8] ns: make sure reference are dropped outside of rcu lock Christian Brauner
2025-11-09 21:11 ` [PATCH 4/8] ns: return EFAULT on put_user() error Christian Brauner
2025-11-09 21:11 ` [PATCH 5/8] ns: handle setns(pidfd, ...) cleanly Christian Brauner
2025-11-09 21:11 ` [PATCH 6/8] ns: add asserts for active refcount underflow Christian Brauner
2025-11-09 21:11 ` [PATCH 7/8] selftests/namespaces: add active reference count regression test Christian Brauner
2025-11-09 21:11 ` [PATCH 8/8] selftests/namespaces: test for efault Christian Brauner
2025-11-09 22:55 ` [PATCH 0/8] ns: fixes for namespace iteration and active reference counting Hillf Danton
2025-11-10  8:41   ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2025-11-10 22:47     ` Hillf Danton
2025-11-14 10:00     ` Hillf Danton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251110-elastisch-endeffekt-747abc5a614a@brauner \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+1957b26299cf3ff7890c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).