From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A482155389; Tue, 11 Nov 2025 09:48:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762854531; cv=none; b=tympJ2ElTjz4AfEtG4Swk2QQyjPIgRDc6GQD2x9Iunv11PTYFuKQaonhsGawnqVqraK7fW/Hb1OgGLCtzjXXkJTeEAA8IzDAbWXC4FkELbqOFDzwfyBfCW6VD0A8mXSNhl6z/Ce7r25i3UdUsAlO9XhD0vfoLGtglYLfpv10eXc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762854531; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Xmlr8Id/6Z//lY5LW7VmtWmZos+x0Ts3itVyP3tresU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lUxPZU1HAnIymP9gBARcGNmUKAI9Tst5K95Xy3gG4P2PwHr4X1N22QH0CKUFi/ZEeWFszJ6MabUFQLI49Z0jXsaqIAOJGqajSSg59OeUMDYnzlltiwihEVc47f3FOX7V8puS2iFo/dIYaIUlrlArT9j4neNp2rwI7QxLovoWRbs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jKG3wSjF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jKG3wSjF" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB3BBC116B1; Tue, 11 Nov 2025 09:48:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1762854530; bh=Xmlr8Id/6Z//lY5LW7VmtWmZos+x0Ts3itVyP3tresU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=jKG3wSjFPl0edwk0JvoFI4JEMuxh8m/peX6ADOH4L1YcpqEShJ6EIAqR+TbqlGEhr LHmgwZmIYSMs7XxFCcuDY87PmEiNLor/L9GGQ6hUTLkJZuSc1SR2ViGc+cg54Etq6V wJIBQ2iFVC3zO8jyLTc4pTx/Z3TXvlDn8hwf6EeF/lQZvmI7Dm3dd/yl/DEOOkKa5T wEno5O+/ROjoDoC67Z6L1yhfyj1ZTTYpY/LCR6NXMpilq+Z/+vY5R8gnyuJvo5Nosm daASD5Hy4CuajmD49tCtzZGqEZRkTqbWMzGZr+ZtashjTg2p5TJ5Jc17lrybd3hmlt scyT/K9y3icsQ== Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 10:48:45 +0100 From: Christian Brauner To: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas =?utf-8?Q?Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= , Alexander Viro , Jan Kara , Ingo Molnar , Darren Hart , Davidlohr Bueso , =?utf-8?B?QW5kcsOp?= Almeida , Anna-Maria Behnsen , Frederic Weisbecker , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] restart_block: simplify expiration timestamps Message-ID: <20251111-formel-seufzen-bdf2c97c735a@brauner> References: <20251110-restart-block-expiration-v1-0-5d39cc93df4f@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20251110-restart-block-expiration-v1-0-5d39cc93df4f@linutronix.de> On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 10:38:50AM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > Various expiration timestamps are stored in the restart block as > different types than their respective subsystem is using. > > Align the types. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh > --- @Thomas, @Peter, do the timer/futex changes look fine to you?