From: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
To: brauner@kernel.org
Cc: hch@infradead.org, djwong@kernel.org, bfoster@redhat.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: [PATCH v4 6/9] iomap: simplify when reads can be skipped for writes
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 11:36:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251111193658.3495942-7-joannelkoong@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251111193658.3495942-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Currently, the logic for skipping the read range for a write is
if (!(iter->flags & IOMAP_UNSHARE) &&
(from <= poff || from >= poff + plen) &&
(to <= poff || to >= poff + plen))
which breaks down to skipping the read if any of these are true:
a) from <= poff && to <= poff
b) from <= poff && to >= poff + plen
c) from >= poff + plen && to <= poff
d) from >= poff + plen && to >= poff + plen
This can be simplified to
if (!(iter->flags & IOMAP_UNSHARE) && from <= poff && to >= poff + plen)
from the following reasoning:
a) from <= poff && to <= poff
This reduces to 'to <= poff' since it is guaranteed that 'from <= to'
(since to = from + len). It is not possible for 'from <= to' to be true
here because we only reach here if plen > 0 (thanks to the preceding 'if
(plen == 0)' check that would break us out of the loop). If 'to <=
poff', plen would have to be 0 since poff and plen get adjusted in
lockstep for uptodate blocks. This means we can eliminate this check.
c) from >= poff + plen && to <= poff
This is not possible since 'from <= to' and 'plen > 0'. We can eliminate
this check.
d) from >= poff + plen && to >= poff + plen
This reduces to 'from >= poff + plen' since 'from <= to'.
It is not possible for 'from >= poff + plen' to be true here. We only
reach here if plen > 0 and for writes, poff and plen will always be
block-aligned, which means poff <= from < poff + plen. We can eliminate
this check.
The only valid check is b) from <= poff && to >= poff + plen.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
---
fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
index c82b5b24d4b3..17449ea13420 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@ -758,9 +758,12 @@ static int __iomap_write_begin(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
if (plen == 0)
break;
- if (!(iter->flags & IOMAP_UNSHARE) &&
- (from <= poff || from >= poff + plen) &&
- (to <= poff || to >= poff + plen))
+ /*
+ * If the read range will be entirely overwritten by the write,
+ * we can skip having to zero/read it in.
+ */
+ if (!(iter->flags & IOMAP_UNSHARE) && from <= poff &&
+ to >= poff + plen)
continue;
if (iomap_block_needs_zeroing(iter, block_start)) {
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-11 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-11 19:36 [PATCH v4 0/9] iomap: buffered io changes Joanne Koong
2025-11-11 19:36 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] iomap: rename bytes_pending/bytes_accounted to bytes_submitted/bytes_not_submitted Joanne Koong
2025-11-11 19:36 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] iomap: account for unaligned end offsets when truncating read range Joanne Koong
2025-11-11 19:36 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] docs: document iomap writeback's iomap_finish_folio_write() requirement Joanne Koong
2025-11-11 19:36 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] iomap: optimize pending async writeback accounting Joanne Koong
2025-11-11 19:36 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] iomap: simplify ->read_folio_range() error handling for reads Joanne Koong
2025-11-17 20:46 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-11-17 23:26 ` Joanne Koong
2025-11-11 19:36 ` Joanne Koong [this message]
2025-11-11 19:36 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] iomap: use loff_t for file positions and offsets in writeback code Joanne Koong
2025-11-19 3:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-11-19 18:10 ` Joanne Koong
2025-11-19 18:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-19 19:17 ` Joanne Koong
2025-11-19 19:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-11-20 0:38 ` Joanne Koong
2025-11-25 9:22 ` Christian Brauner
2025-11-11 19:36 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] iomap: use find_next_bit() for dirty bitmap scanning Joanne Koong
2025-11-11 19:36 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] iomap: use find_next_bit() for uptodate " Joanne Koong
2025-11-12 10:34 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] iomap: buffered io changes Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251111193658.3495942-7-joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--to=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).