From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, mjguzik@gmail.com,
paul@paul-moore.com, audit@vger.kernel.org,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 11/13] allow incomplete imports of filenames
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 01:12:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251119011223.GL2441659@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <257804ed-438e-4085-a8c2-ac107fe4c73d@kernel.dk>
On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 07:41:24AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > diff --git a/io_uring/openclose.c b/io_uring/openclose.c
> > index bfeb91b31bba..6bc14f626923 100644
> > --- a/io_uring/openclose.c
> > +++ b/io_uring/openclose.c
> > @@ -121,6 +118,7 @@ int io_openat2(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
> > struct file *file;
> > bool resolve_nonblock, nonblock_set;
> > bool fixed = !!open->file_slot;
> > + struct filename *name __free(putname) = complete_getname(&open->filename);
> > int ret;
> >
> > ret = build_open_flags(&open->how, &op);
>
> I don't think this will work as-is - the prep has been done on the
> request, but we could be retrying io_openat2(). That will happen if this
> function returns -EAGAIN. That will then end up with a cleared out
> filename for the second (blocking) invocation.
If retry happens in a different thread, we do have a problem ;-/
This -EAGAIN might've come from ->open() itself (io_openat2() sets
O_NONBLOCK on the same calls), and by that point we have already
shoved that filename in direction of audit...
IMO the first 10 commits (up to and including audit_reusename() removal)
are useful on their own, but io_openat2() part does look broken.
Hmm... FWIW, we could do a primitive like
int putname_to_incomplete(struct incomplete_name *v, struct filename *name)
{
if (likely(name->refcnt == 1)) {
v->__incomplete_filename = name;
return 0;
}
v->__incomplete_filename = <duplicate name>;
putname(name);
if (unlikely(!v->__incomplete_filename))
return -ENOMEM;
return 0;
}
and have
if (ret == -EAGAIN &&
(!resolve_nonblock && (issue_flags & IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK))) {
ret = putname_to_incomplete(&open->filename,
no_free_ptr(name));
if (unlikely(ret))
goto err;
return -EAGAIN;
}
in io_openat2() (in addition to what's already done in 11/13). Workable or
too disgusting?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-19 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-09 6:37 [RFC][PATCH 00/13] io_uring, struct filename and audit Al Viro
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/13] do_faccessat(): import pathname only once Al Viro
2025-11-13 10:11 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/13] do_fchmodat(): " Al Viro
2025-11-13 10:12 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/13] do_fchownat(): " Al Viro
2025-11-13 10:13 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/13] do_utimes_path(): " Al Viro
2025-11-13 10:15 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/13] chdir(2): " Al Viro
2025-11-13 10:16 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/13] chroot(2): " Al Viro
2025-11-13 10:18 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/13] user_statfs(): " Al Viro
2025-11-13 10:18 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/13] do_sys_truncate(): " Al Viro
2025-11-13 10:18 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/13] do_readlinkat(): " Al Viro
2025-11-13 10:20 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/13] get rid of audit_reusename() Al Viro
2025-11-09 19:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-09 19:55 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-11-09 20:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-09 22:18 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-11-09 22:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-09 22:33 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-11-09 22:39 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-11-09 22:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-09 22:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-09 23:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-09 22:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-10 5:17 ` Al Viro
2025-11-10 16:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-10 19:58 ` Al Viro
2025-11-10 20:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-11 1:16 ` Al Viro
2025-11-12 9:26 ` Christian Brauner
2025-11-10 6:05 ` Al Viro
2025-11-10 6:36 ` Al Viro
2025-11-10 16:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-11-10 23:13 ` Paul Moore
2025-11-11 0:23 ` Paul Moore
2025-11-13 10:29 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/13] allow incomplete imports of filenames Al Viro
2025-11-11 0:45 ` Paul Moore
2025-11-11 14:41 ` Jens Axboe
2025-11-19 1:12 ` Al Viro [this message]
2025-11-19 1:14 ` Al Viro
2025-11-19 5:41 ` Al Viro
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/13] fs: touch up predicts in putname() Al Viro
2025-11-09 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/13] struct filename ->refcnt doesn't need to be atomic Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251119011223.GL2441659@ZenIV \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=audit@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).