From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Ahmet Eray Karadag <eraykrdg1@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
david.hunter.linux@gmail.com,
syzbot+1c70732df5fd4f0e4fbb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] adfs: fix memory leak in sb->s_fs_info
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2025 02:27:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251214022745.GK1712166@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251214020212.GJ1712166@ZenIV>
On Sun, Dec 14, 2025 at 02:02:12AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> IOW, there's our double-free. For extra fun, it's not just kfree() + kfree(),
> it's kfree_rcu() + kfree().
[sorry, accidentally sent halfway through writing a reply; continued below]
So after successful mount, it gets freed (RCU-delayed) from ->kill_sb() called
at fs shutdown.
On adfs_fill_super() failure (hit #2) it is freed on failure exit - with non-delayed
kfree().
In case we never got to superblock allocation, the thing gets freed by adfs_free_fc()
(also non-delayed).
The gap is between a successful call of sget_fc() and call of adfs_fill_super()
(in get_tree_bdev(), which is where adfs_fill_super() is passed as a callback).
If setup_bdev_super() fails, we will
* transfer it from fs_context to super_block, so the fs_context destruction
won't have anything to free
* won't free it in never-called adfs_fill_super()
* won't free it in ->kill_sb(), since ->s_root remains NULL and ->put_super()
is never called.
A leak is real, IOW.
Getting ->kill_sb() to do freeing unconditionally would cover the gap. However,
to do that, we need to _move_ freeing (RCU-delayed) from adfs_put_super() to
adfs_kill_sb(), not just add kfree() in the latter.
What's more, that allows to simplify adfs_fill_super() failure exit: we can leave
freeing asb (and clearing ->s_fs_info, of course) to ->kill_sb() - the latter is
called on any superblock destruction, including that after failing fill_super()
callback. Almost the first thing done by deactivate_locked_super() called in
that case is
fs->kill_sb(s);
So if we go with "have it freed in ->kill_sb()" approach, the solution would be
1) adfs_kill_sb() calling kfree_rcu(asb, rcu) instead of kfree(asb)
2) call of kfree_rcu() removed from adfs_put_super()
3) all goto error; in adfs_fill_super() becoming return ret; (and error:
getting removed, that is)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-14 2:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-13 23:36 [PATCH] adfs: fix memory leak in sb->s_fs_info Ahmet Eray Karadag
2025-12-14 1:32 ` Al Viro
2025-12-14 2:02 ` Al Viro
2025-12-14 2:27 ` Al Viro [this message]
2025-12-14 2:58 ` Ahmet Eray Karadag
2025-12-15 0:22 ` [PATCH v2] " Ahmet Eray Karadag
2025-12-15 1:55 ` Al Viro
2025-12-15 3:14 ` [PATCH v3] " Ahmet Eray Karadag
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251214022745.GK1712166@ZenIV \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david.hunter.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=eraykrdg1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=syzbot+1c70732df5fd4f0e4fbb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox