From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B5722AD0C; Mon, 19 Jan 2026 22:50:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768863026; cv=none; b=PUOmkhh1d8mQ4f3Sv4UwUuT+HGiDCQzdGy/NuP7A5j7b5WEge1zls2XsDWE3ON2Rm28A1IYpGmoz8pItZ51T2C4FvJa3iyefKrUeNPemzdIiFvoEZal//X4Lv83eGEs7jejmU4Q19pO/uAlGCOAiMVdSsQZs3FKTQJqQSj8chkM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768863026; c=relaxed/simple; bh=shuI98kf3EXyDV7V4LCARdp7GfQKTZgsndPYTnq6NZY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=F+OwwtgOjdp69ikUWQr2pWluGpMXQ9JlexVOTBy4oMDdnX+icF+8ECN60Ccn4wQwojZYs1v61lYReVjlmM6+IeWW+M18Vk0qRRH4SYWtlt52kK7hRCXG994jV3KQOsABrVJyK0J5jC6Nl35alXS08rDGVZ5WP2VPyuAeIvmzIE0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Gyw/4e5m; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Gyw/4e5m" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1768863024; x=1800399024; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=shuI98kf3EXyDV7V4LCARdp7GfQKTZgsndPYTnq6NZY=; b=Gyw/4e5mNJs4PalLml4cfBnHDSUBjIzKPUNjMYd6ZwKlopD6P5PEz8Ya Oq36Bqa9LgHEVWuJe2jagmz9A/2ZwSZlJDO3C7qf820YTGYk2sQrSfLbc drgupDIIR35W+qdCiyDwesFJdoV+J78BK0ILC+zf87xVd3sT+I8y/zMPl 9xhgHfrrNBNrfWrG6sXZNgXA7eG2oVNUpdqULss+ys+m6+kfox0zfZE3Y 0mbwKBwMatnc76XFepskDQr43n8TmQKTqOQjdlGXqIYePYrXS0zLn0az9 L2gVhVIJymVUtXv2dhc7yiuRWEu8phGxwcncwsuooLJyDH4ENfRuFLZ5F A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: s7BiUdAWROGT7SuNObdohA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: lif21WATT1eszJISUZ1B9g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11676"; a="73698949" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,239,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="73698949" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jan 2026 14:50:24 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: fP0NQUzaQk+zxRVc+KX3xg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 3gqHIpWtQqS8Fcua+DXhKQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 765f4a05e27f) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Jan 2026 14:50:20 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 765f4a05e27f with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vhy4g-00000000OML-1fif; Mon, 19 Jan 2026 22:50:18 +0000 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 06:49:54 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Dai Ngo , chuck.lever@oracle.com, jlayton@kernel.org, neil@brown.name, okorniev@redhat.com, tom@talpey.com, hch@lst.de, alex.aring@gmail.com Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] NFSD: Enforce recall timeout for layout conflict Message-ID: <202601200621.KNAnUu7y-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260119174737.3619599-1-dai.ngo@oracle.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260119174737.3619599-1-dai.ngo@oracle.com> Hi Dai, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on brauner-vfs/vfs.all] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.19-rc6 next-20260116] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Dai-Ngo/NFSD-Enforce-recall-timeout-for-layout-conflict/20260120-015237 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git vfs.all patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260119174737.3619599-1-dai.ngo%40oracle.com patch subject: [PATCH 1/1] NFSD: Enforce recall timeout for layout conflict config: m68k-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260120/202601200621.KNAnUu7y-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260120/202601200621.KNAnUu7y-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601200621.KNAnUu7y-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> Warning: fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c:793 expecting prototype for nfsd_layout_breaker_timedout(). Prototype was for nfsd4_layout_lm_breaker_timedout() instead >> Warning: fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c:828 function parameter 'fl' not described in 'nfsd4_layout_lm_retry' >> Warning: fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c:828 function parameter 'ctx' not described in 'nfsd4_layout_lm_retry' >> Warning: fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c:828 expecting prototype for nfsd4_layout_lm_conflict(). Prototype was for nfsd4_layout_lm_retry() instead -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki