From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
Cc: chuck.lever@oracle.com, jlayton@kernel.org, neil@brown.name,
okorniev@redhat.com, tom@talpey.com, hch@lst.de,
alex.aring@gmail.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] NFSD: Enforce recall timeout for layout conflict
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 08:26:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260120072638.GA6380@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260119174737.3619599-1-dai.ngo@oracle.com>
On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 09:47:24AM -0800, Dai Ngo wrote:
> When a layout conflict triggers a recall, enforcing a timeout
> is necessary to prevent excessive nfsd threads from being tied
> up in __break_lease and ensure the server can continue servicing
> incoming requests efficiently.
>
> This patch introduces two new functions in lease_manager_operations:
>
> 1. lm_breaker_timedout: Invoked when a lease recall times out,
> allowing the lease manager to take appropriate action.
>
> The NFSD lease manager uses this to handle layout recall
> timeouts. If the layout type supports fencing, a fence
> operation is issued to prevent the client from accessing
> the block device.
>
> 2. lm_need_to_retry: Invoked when there is a lease conflict.
> This allows the lease manager to instruct __break_lease
> to return an error to the caller, prompting a retry of
> the conflicting operation.
>
> The NFSD lease manager uses this to avoid excessive nfsd
> from being blocked in __break_lease, which could hinder
> the server's ability to service incoming requests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
This looks reasonable to me, but I don't really feel confident
enough about the locks.c code that you should consider this a
review.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-20 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-19 17:47 [PATCH 1/1] NFSD: Enforce recall timeout for layout conflict Dai Ngo
2026-01-19 22:49 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-20 7:26 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-01-20 18:54 ` Dai Ngo
2026-01-21 8:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-20 15:19 ` Chuck Lever
2026-01-20 19:22 ` Dai Ngo
2026-01-20 20:55 ` Dai Ngo
2026-01-20 20:41 ` Jeff Layton
2026-01-20 21:22 ` Dai Ngo
2026-01-20 21:28 ` Jeff Layton
2026-01-20 21:42 ` Dai Ngo
2026-01-20 22:03 ` Jeff Layton
2026-01-20 22:48 ` Dai Ngo
2026-01-21 14:34 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260120072638.GA6380@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=alex.aring@gmail.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox