From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@redhat.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, fsverity@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] fsverity: kick off hash readahead at data I/O submission time
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 12:53:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260124205329.GE2762@quark> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260122082214.452153-6-hch@lst.de>
On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 09:22:01AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> +/**
> + * generic_readahead_merkle_tree() - generic ->readahead_merkle_tree helper
> + * @inode: inode containing the Merkle tree
> + * @index: 0-based index of the first page to read ahead in the inode
> + * @nr_pages: number of data pages to read ahead
> + *
> + * The caller needs to adjust @index from the Merkle-tree relative index passed
> + * to ->read_merkle_tree_page to the actual index where the Merkle tree is
> + * stored in the page cache for @inode.
> + */
> +void generic_readahead_merkle_tree(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
> + unsigned long nr_pages)
> {
> struct folio *folio;
>
> folio = __filemap_get_folio(inode->i_mapping, index, FGP_ACCESSED, 0);
> - if (IS_ERR(folio) || !folio_test_uptodate(folio)) {
> + if (PTR_ERR(folio) == -ENOENT || !folio_test_uptodate(folio)) {
This dereferences an ERR_PTR() when __filemap_get_folio() returns an
error other than -ENOENT.
> diff --git a/fs/verity/read_metadata.c b/fs/verity/read_metadata.c
> index cba5d6af4e04..430306abc4c6 100644
> --- a/fs/verity/read_metadata.c
> +++ b/fs/verity/read_metadata.c
> @@ -28,24 +28,24 @@ static int fsverity_read_merkle_tree(struct inode *inode,
> if (offset >= end_offset)
> return 0;
> offs_in_page = offset_in_page(offset);
> + index = offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> last_index = (end_offset - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> + __fsverity_readahead(inode, vi, offset, last_index - index + 1);
This passes a position in the Merkle tree to a function that expects a
position in the file data.
I think the correct thing to do here would be the following:
if (inode->i_sb->s_vop->readahead_merkle_tree)
inode->i_sb->s_vop->readahead_merkle_tree(inode, index,
last_index - index + 1);
Then __fsverity_readahead() can be folded into fsverity_readahead().
> +void __fsverity_readahead(struct inode *inode, const struct fsverity_info *vi,
> + loff_t data_start_pos, unsigned long nr_pages)
> +{
> + const struct merkle_tree_params *params = &vi->tree_params;
> + u64 start_hidx = data_start_pos >> params->log_blocksize;
> + u64 end_hidx = (data_start_pos + ((nr_pages - 1) << PAGE_SHIFT)) >>
> + params->log_blocksize;
(nr_pages - 1) << PAGE_SHIFT can overflow an 'unsigned long'.
(nr_pages - 1) needs to be cast to u64 before doing the shift.
But also it would make more sense to pass
(pgoff_t start_index, unsigned long nr_pages) instead of
(loff_t data_start_pos, unsigned long nr_pages),
so that the two numbers have the same units.
start_idx and end_hidx could then be computed as follows:
u64 start_hidx = (u64)start_index << params->log_blocks_per_page;
u64 end_hidx = (((u64)start_index + nr_pages) << params->log_blocks_per_page) - 1;
Note that fsverity_readahead() derives the position from the index. If
it just used the index directly, that would be more direct.
> + int level;
> +
> + if (!inode->i_sb->s_vop->readahead_merkle_tree)
> + return;
> + if (unlikely(data_start_pos >= inode->i_size))
> + return;
The check against i_size shouldn't be necessary: the caller should just
call this only for data it's actually going to read.
> + for (level = 0; level < params->num_levels; level++) {
> + unsigned long level_start = params->level_start[level];
> + unsigned long next_start_hidx = start_hidx >> params->log_arity;
> + unsigned long next_end_hidx = end_hidx >> params->log_arity;
> + unsigned long start_idx = (level_start + next_start_hidx) >>
> + params->log_blocks_per_page;
> + unsigned long end_idx = (level_start + next_end_hidx) >>
> + params->log_blocks_per_page;
start_idx and end_idx should have type pgoff_t to make it clear that
they're page indices.
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fsverity_readahead);
This should be below the definition of fsverity_readahead, not the
definition of __fsverity_readahead.
> +/**
> + * fsverity_readahead() - kick off readahead on fsverity hashes
> + * @folio: first folio that is being read
folio => file data folio
Otherwise it can be confused with the Merkle tree.
> + * Start readahead on fsverity hashes. To be called from the file systems
> + * ->read_folio and ->readahead methods to ensure that the hashes are
> + * already cached on completion of the file data read if possible.
Similarly, it would be helpful to clarify that the readahead is done on
the hashes *that will be needed to verify the specified file data*.
Otherwise it might sound like the caller is specifying the hashes to
readahead directly.
> + /**
> + * Perform readahad of a Merkle tree for the given inode.
readahad => readahead
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-24 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-22 8:21 fsverity cleanups, speedup and memory usage optimization v2 Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 8:21 ` [PATCH 01/11] fs,fsverity: reject size changes on fsverity files in setattr_prepare Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 9:12 ` Jan Kara
2026-01-22 21:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-22 8:21 ` [PATCH 02/11] fs,fsverity: clear out fsverity_info from common code Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 9:15 ` Jan Kara
2026-01-22 21:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-22 8:21 ` [PATCH 03/11] fsverity: pass struct file to ->write_merkle_tree_block Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 10:04 ` Andrey Albershteyn
2026-01-22 21:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-22 8:22 ` [PATCH 04/11] fsverity: start consolidating pagecache code Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 9:18 ` Jan Kara
2026-01-22 10:12 ` Andrey Albershteyn
2026-01-22 21:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-23 5:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-23 7:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-24 19:27 ` Eric Biggers
2026-01-26 4:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 8:22 ` [PATCH 05/11] fsverity: kick off hash readahead at data I/O submission time Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 21:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-23 5:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-23 7:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-24 20:53 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2026-01-26 4:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 8:22 ` [PATCH 06/11] fsverity: push out fsverity_info lookup Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 21:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-24 21:19 ` Eric Biggers
2026-01-26 4:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 8:22 ` [PATCH 07/11] fs: consolidate fsverity_info lookup in buffer.c Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 21:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-23 5:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-23 7:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-23 7:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 8:22 ` [PATCH 08/11] ext4: consolidate fsverity_info lookup Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 21:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-23 5:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-23 7:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-22 8:22 ` [PATCH 09/11] f2fs: " Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 8:22 ` [PATCH 10/11] btrfs: " Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 8:22 ` [PATCH 11/11] fsverity: use a hashtable to find the fsverity_info Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 22:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-23 5:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-23 7:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-23 7:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-25 1:31 ` Eric Biggers
2026-01-25 21:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-01-26 4:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-26 20:12 ` Eric Biggers
2026-01-28 21:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-01-28 22:14 ` Eric Biggers
2026-01-26 4:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 15:42 ` fsverity cleanups, speedup and memory usage optimization v2 David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260124205329.GE2762@quark \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=aalbersh@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=fsverity@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox