From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, fsverity@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] fsverity: use a hashtable to find the fsverity_info
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 12:12:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260126201206.GA30838@quark> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260126044432.GE30803@lst.de>
On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 05:44:32AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2026 at 09:48:22PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > Is there a reason not to do as DAX did:
>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_VERITY
> > #define S_VERITY (1 << 16) /* Verity file (using fs/verity/) */
> > +#else
> > +#define S_VERITY 0 /* Make all the verity checks disappear */
> > +#endif
> > #define S_KERNEL_FILE (1 << 17) /* File is in use by the kernel (eg. fs/cachefiles) */
> > #define S_ANON_INODE (1 << 19) /* Inode is an anonymous inode */
> >
> >
> > and then we can drop the CONFIG_FS_VERITY check here and in (at leaast)
> > three other places
>
> I looked into this, but wasn't entirely sure about all callers. Also
> in at least some places we might need the barrier in fsverity_active,
> so my plan was to see how many of the checks should simply be converted
> to fsverity_active in a follow on and how much is left after that first.
When CONFIG_FS_VERITY=n, there can still be inodes that have fsverity
enabled, since they might have already been present on the filesystem.
The S_VERITY flag and the corresponding IS_VERITY() macro are being used
to identify such inodes and handle them appropriately.
Consider fsverity_file_open() for example:
static inline int fsverity_file_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
{
if (IS_VERITY(inode))
return __fsverity_file_open(inode, filp);
return 0;
}
When CONFIG_FS_VERITY=n, __fsverity_file_open() resolves to the stub:
static inline int __fsverity_file_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
So the result is that on a kernel that doesn't have fsverity support
enabled, trying to open an fsverity file fails with EOPNOTSUPP.
But this relies on IS_VERITY() still working correctly.
Similar code that relies on IS_VERITY() working correctly exists in
other places as well, for example in the implementation of statx().
So IS_VERITY() can't be changed to always return false when
CONFIG_FS_VERITY=n, unless we identified all the callers like these and
updated them to check the underlying filesystem-specific flag instead.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-26 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-22 8:21 fsverity cleanups, speedup and memory usage optimization v2 Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 8:21 ` [PATCH 01/11] fs,fsverity: reject size changes on fsverity files in setattr_prepare Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 9:12 ` Jan Kara
2026-01-22 21:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-22 8:21 ` [PATCH 02/11] fs,fsverity: clear out fsverity_info from common code Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 9:15 ` Jan Kara
2026-01-22 21:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-22 8:21 ` [PATCH 03/11] fsverity: pass struct file to ->write_merkle_tree_block Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 10:04 ` Andrey Albershteyn
2026-01-22 21:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-22 8:22 ` [PATCH 04/11] fsverity: start consolidating pagecache code Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 9:18 ` Jan Kara
2026-01-22 10:12 ` Andrey Albershteyn
2026-01-22 21:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-23 5:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-23 7:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-24 19:27 ` Eric Biggers
2026-01-26 4:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 8:22 ` [PATCH 05/11] fsverity: kick off hash readahead at data I/O submission time Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 21:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-23 5:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-23 7:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-24 20:53 ` Eric Biggers
2026-01-26 4:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 8:22 ` [PATCH 06/11] fsverity: push out fsverity_info lookup Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 21:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-24 21:19 ` Eric Biggers
2026-01-26 4:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 8:22 ` [PATCH 07/11] fs: consolidate fsverity_info lookup in buffer.c Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 21:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-23 5:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-23 7:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-23 7:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 8:22 ` [PATCH 08/11] ext4: consolidate fsverity_info lookup Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 21:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-23 5:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-23 7:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-22 8:22 ` [PATCH 09/11] f2fs: " Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 8:22 ` [PATCH 10/11] btrfs: " Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 8:22 ` [PATCH 11/11] fsverity: use a hashtable to find the fsverity_info Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 22:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-23 5:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-23 7:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-01-23 7:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-25 1:31 ` Eric Biggers
2026-01-25 21:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-01-26 4:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-26 20:12 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2026-01-28 21:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-01-28 22:14 ` Eric Biggers
2026-01-26 4:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-22 15:42 ` fsverity cleanups, speedup and memory usage optimization v2 David Sterba
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-02-02 6:06 fsverity speedup and memory usage optimization v5 Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-02 6:06 ` [PATCH 11/11] fsverity: use a hashtable to find the fsverity_info Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260126201206.GA30838@quark \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=aalbersh@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=fsverity@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox