Re: [PATCH 17/31] fuse: use an unrestricted backing device with iomap pagecache io

["Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>]

On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 02:03:35PM -0800, Joanne Koong wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 5:49 PM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> >
> > With iomap support turned on for the pagecache, the kernel issues
> > writeback to directly to block devices and we no longer have to push all
> > those pages through the fuse device to userspace.  Therefore, we don't
> > need the tight dirty limits (~1M) that are used for regular fuse.  This
> > dramatically increases the performance of fuse's pagecache IO.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  fs/fuse/file_iomap.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/fuse/file_iomap.c b/fs/fuse/file_iomap.c
> > index 0bae356045638b..a9bacaa0991afa 100644
> > --- a/fs/fuse/file_iomap.c
> > +++ b/fs/fuse/file_iomap.c
> > @@ -713,6 +713,27 @@ const struct fuse_backing_ops fuse_iomap_backing_ops = {
> >  void fuse_iomap_mount(struct fuse_mount *fm)
> >  {
> >         struct fuse_conn *fc = fm->fc;
> > +       struct super_block *sb = fm->sb;
> > +       struct backing_dev_info *old_bdi = sb->s_bdi;
> > +       char *suffix = sb->s_bdev ? "-fuseblk" : "-fuse";
> > +       int res;
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * sb->s_bdi points to the initial private bdi.  However, we want to
> > +        * redirect it to a new private bdi with default dirty and readahead
> > +        * settings because iomap writeback won't be pushing a ton of dirty
> > +        * data through the fuse device.  If this fails we fall back to the
> > +        * initial fuse bdi.
> > +        */
> > +       sb->s_bdi = &noop_backing_dev_info;
> > +       res = super_setup_bdi_name(sb, "%u:%u%s.iomap", MAJOR(fc->dev),
> > +                                  MINOR(fc->dev), suffix);
> > +       if (res) {
> > +               sb->s_bdi = old_bdi;
> > +       } else {
> > +               bdi_unregister(old_bdi);
> > +               bdi_put(old_bdi);
> > +       }
> 
> Maybe I'm missing something here, but isn't sb->s_bdi already set to
> noop_backing_dev_info when fuse_iomap_mount() is called?
> fuse_fill_super() -> fuse_fill_super_common() -> fuse_bdi_init() does
> this already before the fuse_iomap_mount() call, afaict.

Right.

> I think what we need to do is just unset BDI_CAP_STRICTLIMIT and
> adjust the bdi max ratio?

That's sufficient to undo the effects of fuse_bdi_init, yes.  However
the BDI gets created with the name "$major:$minor{-fuseblk}" and there
are "management" scripts that try to tweak fuse BDIs for better
performance.

I don't want some dumb script to mismanage a fuse-iomap filesystem
because it can't tell the difference, so I create a new bdi with the
name "$major:$minor.iomap" to make it obvious.  But super_setup_bdi_name
gets cranky if s_bdi isn't set to noop and we don't want to fail a mount
here due to ENOMEM so ... I implemented this weird switcheroo code.

> This is more of a nit, but I think it'd also be nice if we
> swapped the ordering of this patch with the previous one enabling
> large folios, so that large folios gets enabled only when all the bdi
> stuff for it is ready.

Will do, thanks for reading these patches!

Also note that I've changed this part of the patchset quite a lot since
this posting; iomap configuration is now a completely separate fuse
command that gets triggered after the FUSE_INIT reply is received.

--D

> Thanks,
> Joanne
> 
> >
> >         /*
> >          * Enable syncfs for iomap fuse servers so that we can send a final
> >
>