* Re: [PATCH v2] mm/fadvise: validate offset in generic_fadvise
2026-02-08 13:57 ` [PATCH v2] mm/fadvise: validate offset in generic_fadvise klourencodev
@ 2026-02-09 8:06 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-09 10:56 ` Jan Kara
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand (Arm) @ 2026-02-09 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: klourencodev, linux-mm; +Cc: jack, rppt, akpm, vbabka, brauner, linux-fsdevel
On 2/8/26 14:57, klourencodev@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Kevin Lourenco <klourencodev@gmail.com>
>
> When converted to (u64) for page calculations, a negative offset can
> produce extremely large page indices. This may lead to issues in certain
> advice modes (excessive readahead or cache invalidation).
>
> Reject negative offsets with -EINVAL for consistent argument validation
> and to avoid silent misbehavior.
>
> POSIX and the man page do not clearly define behavior for negative
> offset/len. FreeBSD rejects negative offsets as well, so failing with
> -EINVAL is consistent with existing practice. The man page can be
> updated separately to document the Linux behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Lourenco <klourencodev@gmail.com>
> ---
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
--
Cheers,
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] mm/fadvise: validate offset in generic_fadvise
2026-02-08 13:57 ` [PATCH v2] mm/fadvise: validate offset in generic_fadvise klourencodev
2026-02-09 8:06 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
@ 2026-02-09 10:56 ` Jan Kara
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2026-02-09 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: klourencodev
Cc: linux-mm, jack, rppt, akpm, david, vbabka, brauner, linux-fsdevel
On Sun 08-02-26 14:57:38, klourencodev@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Kevin Lourenco <klourencodev@gmail.com>
>
> When converted to (u64) for page calculations, a negative offset can
> produce extremely large page indices. This may lead to issues in certain
> advice modes (excessive readahead or cache invalidation).
>
> Reject negative offsets with -EINVAL for consistent argument validation
> and to avoid silent misbehavior.
>
> POSIX and the man page do not clearly define behavior for negative
> offset/len. FreeBSD rejects negative offsets as well, so failing with
> -EINVAL is consistent with existing practice. The man page can be
> updated separately to document the Linux behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Lourenco <klourencodev@gmail.com>
Indeed. That looks like an oversight. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> mm/fadvise.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/fadvise.c b/mm/fadvise.c
> index 67028e30aa91..b63fe21416ff 100644
> --- a/mm/fadvise.c
> +++ b/mm/fadvise.c
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ int generic_fadvise(struct file *file, loff_t offset, loff_t len, int advice)
> return -ESPIPE;
>
> mapping = file->f_mapping;
> - if (!mapping || len < 0)
> + if (!mapping || len < 0 || offset < 0)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> bdi = inode_to_bdi(mapping->host);
> --
> 2.52.0
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread