From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: fsverity@lists.linux.dev, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] f2fs: use fsverity_verify_blocks() instead of fsverity_verify_page()
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2026 20:11:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260215041144.GA2872@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZE_rKsOAgYqTjZ_@casper.infradead.org>
On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 03:38:20AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2026 at 01:50:08PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 14, 2026 at 01:18:29PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/compress.c
> > > @@ -1811,15 +1811,19 @@ static void f2fs_verify_cluster(struct work_struct *work)
> > > int i;
> > >
> > > /* Verify, update, and unlock the decompressed pages. */
> > > for (i = 0; i < dic->cluster_size; i++) {
> > > struct page *rpage = dic->rpages[i];
> > > + struct folio *rfolio;
> > > + size_t offset;
> > >
> > > if (!rpage)
> > > continue;
> > > + rfolio = page_folio(rpage);
> > > + offset = folio_page_idx(rfolio, rpage) * PAGE_SIZE;
> > >
> > > - if (fsverity_verify_page(dic->vi, rpage))
> > > + if (fsverity_verify_blocks(dic->vi, rfolio, PAGE_SIZE, offset))
> > > SetPageUptodate(rpage);
>
> Yeah, no.
>
> if (fsverity_verify_blocks(dic->vi, rfolio,
> folio_size(rfolio), 0));
> folio_mark_uptodate(rfolio);
>
> > > else
> > > ClearPageUptodate(rpage);
>
> This never needed to be here. The folio must already be !uptodate.
> Just delete these two lines.
>
> > > unlock_page(rpage);
>
> folio_unlock(rfolio);
Sure. This kind of scope creep is why I wanted to just do the
straightforward conversion for now.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-15 4:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-14 21:18 [PATCH v2 0/2] fsverity: remove fsverity_verify_page() Eric Biggers
2026-02-14 21:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] f2fs: use fsverity_verify_blocks() instead of fsverity_verify_page() Eric Biggers
2026-02-14 21:50 ` Eric Biggers
2026-02-14 22:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-02-15 3:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-02-15 4:11 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2026-02-14 21:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] fsverity: remove fsverity_verify_page() Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260215041144.GA2872@sol \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=fsverity@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox