From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Qiliang Yuan <realwujing@gmail.com>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yuanql9@chinatelecom.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs/file: optimize close_range() complexity from O(N) to O(Sparse)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 17:34:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260218013451.GA3161@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260123081221.659125-1-realwujing@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 03:12:21AM -0500, Qiliang Yuan wrote:
> In close_range(), the kernel traditionally performs a linear scan over the
> [fd, max_fd] range, resulting in O(N) complexity where N is the range size.
> For processes with sparse FD tables, this is inefficient as it checks many
> unallocated slots.
>
> This patch optimizes __range_close() by using find_next_bit() on the
> open_fds bitmap to skip holes. This shifts the algorithmic complexity from
> O(Range Size) to O(Active FDs), providing a significant performance boost
> for large-range close operations on sparse file descriptor tables.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qiliang Yuan <realwujing@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qiliang Yuan <yuanql9@chinatelecom.cn>
> ---
> v2:
> - Recalculate fdt after re-acquiring file_lock to avoid UAF if the
> table is expanded/reallocated during filp_close() or cond_resched().
> v1:
> - Initial optimization using find_next_bit() on open_fds bitmap to
> skip holes, improving complexity to O(Active FDs).
>
> fs/file.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Well, the time complexity is still linear. Just the constant factor is
better now because now it skips 64 fds at a time rather than 1.
Probably still worth it, but the claim that the time complexity is now
"O(Active FDs)" is false.
- Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-18 1:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-22 16:35 [PATCH] fs/file: optimize close_range() complexity from O(N) to O(Sparse) Qiliang Yuan
2026-01-22 17:14 ` Al Viro
2026-01-23 8:12 ` [PATCH v2] " Qiliang Yuan
2026-01-23 11:23 ` Jan Kara
2026-01-23 14:38 ` Christian Brauner
2026-01-27 3:03 ` Qiliang Yuan
2026-02-18 1:34 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260218013451.GA3161@sol \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=realwujing@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yuanql9@chinatelecom.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox