From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>,
brauner@kernel.org, wegao@suse.com, sashal@kernel.org,
hch@infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] iomap: don't mark folio uptodate if read IO has bytes pending
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 22:11:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260219061101.GO6467@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZaQO0jQaZXakwOA@casper.infradead.org>
On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 04:23:23AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 06:45:34PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 04:39:11PM -0800, Joanne Koong wrote:
> > > If a folio has ifs metadata attached to it and the folio is partially
> > > read in through an async IO helper with the rest of it then being read
> > > in through post-EOF zeroing or as inline data, and the helper
> > > successfully finishes the read first, then post-EOF zeroing / reading
> > > inline will mark the folio as uptodate in iomap_set_range_uptodate().
> > >
> > > This is a problem because when the read completion path later calls
> > > iomap_read_end(), it will call folio_end_read(), which sets the uptodate
> > > bit using XOR semantics. Calling folio_end_read() on a folio that was
> > > already marked uptodate clears the uptodate bit.
> >
> > Aha, I wondered if that xor thing was going to come back to bite us.
>
> This isn't "the xor thing has come back to bite us". This is "the iomap
> code is now too complicated and I cannot figure out how to explain to
> Joanne that there's really a simple way to do this".
>
> I'm going to have to set aside my current projects and redo the iomap
> readahead/read_folio code myself, aren't I?
Well you could try explaining to me what that simpler way is?
/me gets the sense he's missing a discussion somewhere...
--D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-19 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-19 0:39 [PATCH v1 0/1] iomap: don't mark folio uptodate if read IO has bytes pending Joanne Koong
2026-02-19 0:39 ` [PATCH v1 1/1] " Joanne Koong
2026-02-19 2:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-19 4:23 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-02-19 6:11 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-02-19 6:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-20 22:13 ` Joanne Koong
2026-02-20 23:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-23 23:53 ` Joanne Koong
2026-02-24 15:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260219061101.GO6467@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=wegao@suse.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox