From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62EEA41C62; Sat, 21 Feb 2026 19:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771703231; cv=none; b=XxA4mzDTiVeboPen8jw8sl9RIU9wxSCSLU6b44BPWP2qfMMLcsX36PcNHpQd3lX8hZKAWiRg2wXLs/F/CHilHVl5CcxsSSO+ZrSX7VXMarR5WPyNjDTDLuRO7sHnz925UJDRd9F1ug7SjTpA7ccmxWkDC7LsEy5SpkPl2MAmYiw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771703231; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+Lml4KArtsOCi5pvVS/O/dpytCcmSTUlIcJifnlJFd4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=P5C0OH3dzPX2Phd72cKHSY+0TXhkrCtgirEUIxICoX1F3MG7M9UEWr6659CEf/LAktdLIsf/dJzQ84VvJV+s+CXmfNiv+jIzCBNs1GKiXOQTmcKmngH6uGhLR/6p8VG9SnT+yHjEL7LsAWvGyUTAbV5v8pHXiAb9NLVTgQrngrI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=oZ9sJa10; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="oZ9sJa10" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D4F4C4CEF7; Sat, 21 Feb 2026 19:47:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1771703230; bh=+Lml4KArtsOCi5pvVS/O/dpytCcmSTUlIcJifnlJFd4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=oZ9sJa10y84CZ5/eOp0f3PDnfgoLrpv8H4nZHgyDKOe5krFzC0L1WMqYXMQnAC2nB tbiKSihxbaa1i831qZ4QbOC/pAbF14wcc+QnSESdEj5Av1fofrw4g+fxbsN64O//rQ sQsHen82gDPeJ5lUbKfupjfHYoGmxAF38HSRnJPJeJueOQE7qxs26gSn/3fXANU3xO uO3iSPrNADCHffxawoLnKmiL+hs+UHGAn5+UYbh4wgeohPgVFJn6UqtoBMiAs6+E6N zcvfS8pd6vDZkh8mNNQ+HRUFHD5lQ18cmsyO31kczSbmmpzZqQX6JKzQB4puy7Q+Kb iwE7nZosrTlFQ== Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2026 11:47:08 -0800 From: Eric Biggers To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , Jaegeuk Kim , Andreas Dilger , Chao Yu , Christian Brauner , "Darrick J. Wong" , linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] fscrypt: return a byte offset from bh_get_inode_and_lblk_num Message-ID: <20260221194708.GD2536@quark> References: <20260218061531.3318130-1-hch@lst.de> <20260218061531.3318130-7-hch@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260218061531.3318130-7-hch@lst.de> On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 07:14:44AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ static bool bh_get_inode_and_lblk_num(const struct buffer_head *bh, > inode = mapping->host; > > *inode_ret = inode; > - *lblk_num_ret = (folio_pos(folio) + bh_offset(bh)) >> inode->i_blkbits; > + *pos_ret = folio_pos(folio) + bh_offset(bh); > return true; > } Rename bh_get_inode_and_lblk_num() to bh_get_inode_and_pos() to reflect the new semantics. (And s/logical block number/file position/ in the comment above it) - Eric