From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] xfs: fix iomap hole map reporting for zoned zero range
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 10:11:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260309171100.GL6033@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260309134506.167663-2-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 09:44:59AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> The hole mapping logic for zero range in zoned mode is not quite
> correct. It currently reports a hole whenever one exists in the data
> fork. If the first write to a sparse range has completed and not yet
> written back, the blocks exist in the COW fork as delalloc until
> writeback completes, at which point they are allocated and mapped
> into the data fork. If a zero range occurs on a range that has not
> yet populated the data fork, we will incorrectly report it as a
> hole.
>
> Note that this currently functions correctly because we are bailed
> out by the pagecache flush in iomap_zero_range(). If a hole or
> unwritten mapping is reported with dirty pagecache, it assumes there
> is pending data, flushes to induce any pending block
> allocations/remaps, and retries the lookup. We want to remove this
> hack from iomap, however, so update iomap_begin() to only report a
> hole for zeroing when one exists in both forks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index be86d43044df..8c3469d2c73e 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -1651,14 +1651,6 @@ xfs_zoned_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
> &smap))
> smap.br_startoff = end_fsb; /* fake hole until EOF */
> if (smap.br_startoff > offset_fsb) {
> - /*
> - * We never need to allocate blocks for zeroing a hole.
> - */
> - if (flags & IOMAP_ZERO) {
> - xfs_hole_to_iomap(ip, iomap, offset_fsb,
> - smap.br_startoff);
> - goto out_unlock;
> - }
> end_fsb = min(end_fsb, smap.br_startoff);
> } else {
> end_fsb = min(end_fsb,
> @@ -1690,6 +1682,16 @@ xfs_zoned_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
> count_fsb = min3(end_fsb - offset_fsb, XFS_MAX_BMBT_EXTLEN,
> XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, 1024 * PAGE_SIZE));
>
> + /*
> + * When zeroing, don't allocate blocks for holes as they are already
> + * zeroes, but we need to ensure that no extents exist in both the data
> + * and COW fork to ensure this really is a hole.
But where is the cow fork check? iomap_iter initializes srcmap to
IOMAP_HOLE, so if we end up here on an IOMAP_ZERO then we've scanned the
data fork and found no mapping. But then we jump to out_unlock, which
means we don't actually look at ip->cowfp.
<confused>
--D
> + */
> + if ((flags & IOMAP_ZERO) && srcmap->type == IOMAP_HOLE) {
> + xfs_hole_to_iomap(ip, iomap, offset_fsb, end_fsb);
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * The block reservation is supposed to cover all blocks that the
> * operation could possible write, but there is a nasty corner case
> --
> 2.52.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-09 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-09 13:44 [PATCH v3 0/8] iomap, xfs: improve zero range flushing and lookup Brian Foster
2026-03-09 13:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] xfs: fix iomap hole map reporting for zoned zero range Brian Foster
2026-03-09 17:11 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-03-09 18:18 ` Brian Foster
2026-03-10 14:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-10 6:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-09 13:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] xfs: flush dirty pagecache over hole in zoned mode " Brian Foster
2026-03-09 17:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-09 18:19 ` Brian Foster
2026-03-10 6:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-10 14:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-10 6:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-09 13:45 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] iomap, xfs: lift zero range hole mapping flush into xfs Brian Foster
2026-03-09 17:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-10 6:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-09 13:45 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] xfs: flush eof folio before insert range size update Brian Foster
2026-03-09 17:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-09 18:24 ` Brian Foster
2026-03-09 13:45 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] xfs: look up cow fork extent earlier for buffered iomap_begin Brian Foster
2026-03-09 13:45 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] xfs: only flush when COW fork blocks overlap data fork holes Brian Foster
2026-03-09 17:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-09 13:45 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] xfs: replace zero range flush with folio batch Brian Foster
2026-03-09 17:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-09 13:45 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] xfs: report cow mappings with dirty pagecache for iomap zero range Brian Foster
2026-03-09 17:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-09 18:31 ` Brian Foster
2026-03-09 18:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-10 6:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-10 14:52 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-10 14:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-10 6:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-10 6:45 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] iomap, xfs: improve zero range flushing and lookup Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260309171100.GL6033@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox