From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] xfs: flush eof folio before insert range size update
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 14:36:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260311213609.GD1770774@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260311162502.192375-5-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 12:24:58PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> The flush in xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin() for zero range over a
> data fork hole fronted by COW fork prealloc is primarily designed to
> provide correct zeroing behavior in particular pagecache conditions.
> As it turns out, this also partially masks some odd behavior in
> insert range (via zero range via setattr).
>
> Insert range bumps i_size the length of the new range, flushes,
> unmaps pagecache and cancels COW prealloc, and then right shifts
> extents from the end of the file back to the target offset of the
> insert. Since the i_size update occurs before the pagecache flush,
> this creates a transient situation where writeback around EOF can
> behave differently.
>
> This appears to be corner case situation, but if happens to be
> fronted by COW fork speculative preallocation and a large, dirty
> folio that contains at least one full COW block beyond EOF, the
> writeback after i_size is bumped may remap that COW fork block into
> the data fork within EOF. The block is zeroed and then shifted back
> out to post-eof, but this is unexpected in that it leads to a
> written post-eof data fork block. This can cause a zero range
> warning on a subsequent size extension, because we should never find
> blocks that require physical zeroing beyond i_size.
>
> To avoid this quirk, flush the EOF folio before the i_size update
> during insert range. The entire range will be flushed, unmapped and
> invalidated anyways, so this should be relatively unnoticeable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> index 6246f34df9fd..48d812b99282 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> @@ -1263,6 +1263,23 @@ xfs_falloc_insert_range(
> if (offset >= isize)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + /*
> + * Let writeback clean up EOF folio state before we bump i_size. The
> + * insert flushes before it starts shifting and under certain
> + * circumstances we can write back blocks that should technically be
> + * considered post-eof (and thus should not be submitted for writeback).
> + *
> + * For example, a large, dirty folio that spans EOF and is backed by
> + * post-eof COW fork preallocation can cause block remap into the data
> + * fork. This shifts back out beyond EOF, but creates an expectedly
> + * written post-eof block. The insert is going to flush, unmap and
> + * cancel prealloc across this whole range, so flush EOF now before we
> + * bump i_size to provide consistent behavior.
> + */
> + error = filemap_write_and_wait_range(inode->i_mapping, isize, isize);
From what I can tell, ext4 has been doing something like this forever...
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> +
> error = xfs_falloc_setsize(file, isize + len);
> if (error)
> return error;
> --
> 2.52.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-11 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-11 16:24 [PATCH v4 0/8] iomap, xfs: improve zero range flushing and lookup Brian Foster
2026-03-11 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] xfs: fix iomap hole map reporting for zoned zero range Brian Foster
2026-03-11 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] xfs: flush dirty pagecache over hole in zoned mode " Brian Foster
2026-03-11 22:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-11 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] iomap, xfs: lift zero range hole mapping flush into xfs Brian Foster
2026-03-11 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] xfs: flush eof folio before insert range size update Brian Foster
2026-03-11 21:36 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-03-11 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] xfs: look up cow fork extent earlier for buffered iomap_begin Brian Foster
2026-03-11 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] xfs: only flush when COW fork blocks overlap data fork holes Brian Foster
2026-03-11 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] xfs: replace zero range flush with folio batch Brian Foster
2026-03-11 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] xfs: report cow mappings with dirty pagecache for iomap zero range Brian Foster
2026-03-12 6:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-18 9:13 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] iomap, xfs: improve zero range flushing and lookup Carlos Maiolino
2026-03-18 9:40 ` Christian Brauner
2026-03-23 10:47 ` Carlos Maiolino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260311213609.GD1770774@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox