From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] xfs: flush dirty pagecache over hole in zoned mode zero range
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 15:14:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260311221408.GE1770774@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260311162502.192375-3-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 12:24:56PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> For zoned filesystems a window exists between the first write to a
> sparse range (i.e. data fork hole) and writeback completion where we
> might spuriously observe holes in both the COW and data forks. This
> occurs because a buffered write populates the COW fork with
> delalloc, writeback submission removes the COW fork delalloc blocks
> and unlocks the inode, and then writeback completion remaps the
> physically allocated blocks into the data fork. If a zero range
> operation does a lookup during this window where both forks show a
> hole, it incorrectly reports a hole mapping for a range that
> contains data.
>
> This currently works because iomap checks for dirty pagecache over
> holes and unwritten mappings. If found, it flushes and retries the
> lookup. We plan to remove the hole flush logic from iomap, however,
> so lift the flush into xfs_zoned_buffered_write_iomap_begin() to
> preserve behavior and document the purpose for it. Zoned XFS
> filesystems don't support unwritten extents, so if zoned mode can
> come up with a way to close this transient hole window in the
> future, this flush can likely be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index 8c3469d2c73e..d3b8c018c883 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -1590,6 +1590,7 @@ xfs_zoned_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
> {
> struct iomap_iter *iter =
> container_of(iomap, struct iomap_iter, iomap);
> + struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
> struct xfs_zone_alloc_ctx *ac = iter->private;
> struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(inode);
> struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
> @@ -1614,6 +1615,7 @@ xfs_zoned_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
> if (error)
> return error;
>
> +restart:
> error = xfs_ilock_for_iomap(ip, flags, &lockmode);
> if (error)
> return error;
> @@ -1686,8 +1688,25 @@ xfs_zoned_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
> * When zeroing, don't allocate blocks for holes as they are already
> * zeroes, but we need to ensure that no extents exist in both the data
> * and COW fork to ensure this really is a hole.
> + *
> + * A window exists where we might observe a hole in both forks with
> + * valid data in cache. Writeback removes the COW fork blocks on
> + * submission but doesn't remap into the data fork until completion. If
> + * the data fork was previously a hole, we'll fail to zero. Until we
> + * find a way to avoid this transient state, check for dirty pagecache
> + * and flush to wait on blocks to land in the data fork.
> */
> if ((flags & IOMAP_ZERO) && srcmap->type == IOMAP_HOLE) {
> + if (filemap_range_needs_writeback(mapping, offset,
> + offset + count - 1)) {
> + xfs_iunlock(ip, lockmode);
> + error = filemap_write_and_wait_range(mapping, offset,
> + offset + count - 1);
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> + goto restart;
> + }
Seems fine to me.
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> +
> xfs_hole_to_iomap(ip, iomap, offset_fsb, end_fsb);
> goto out_unlock;
> }
> --
> 2.52.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-11 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-11 16:24 [PATCH v4 0/8] iomap, xfs: improve zero range flushing and lookup Brian Foster
2026-03-11 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] xfs: fix iomap hole map reporting for zoned zero range Brian Foster
2026-03-11 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] xfs: flush dirty pagecache over hole in zoned mode " Brian Foster
2026-03-11 22:14 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-03-11 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] iomap, xfs: lift zero range hole mapping flush into xfs Brian Foster
2026-03-11 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] xfs: flush eof folio before insert range size update Brian Foster
2026-03-11 21:36 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-03-11 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] xfs: look up cow fork extent earlier for buffered iomap_begin Brian Foster
2026-03-11 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] xfs: only flush when COW fork blocks overlap data fork holes Brian Foster
2026-03-11 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] xfs: replace zero range flush with folio batch Brian Foster
2026-03-11 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] xfs: report cow mappings with dirty pagecache for iomap zero range Brian Foster
2026-03-12 6:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-18 9:13 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] iomap, xfs: improve zero range flushing and lookup Carlos Maiolino
2026-03-18 9:40 ` Christian Brauner
2026-03-23 10:47 ` Carlos Maiolino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260311221408.GE1770774@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox