From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>,
Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] nilfs2: fix 64-bit division operations in nilfs_bmap_find_target_in_group()
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2026 12:47:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260314124748.1ccdf93b@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260313-iino-u64-v2-1-f9abda2464d5@kernel.org>
On Fri, 13 Mar 2026 14:45:20 -0400
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> wrote:
> With the change to make inode->i_ino a u64, the build started failing on
> 32-bit ARM with:
>
> ERROR: modpost: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [fs/nilfs2/nilfs2.ko] undefined!
>
> Fix this by using the 64-bit division interfaces in
> nilfs_bmap_find_target_in_group().
>
> Fixes: 998a59d371c2 ("treewide: fix missed i_ino format specifier conversions")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603100602.KPxiClIO-lkp@intel.com/
> Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
> Acked-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/nilfs2/bmap.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/bmap.c b/fs/nilfs2/bmap.c
> index 824f2bd91c167965ec3a660202b6e6c5f1fe007e..abcf5252578ad24f694bfccf525893674bfcb4bc 100644
> --- a/fs/nilfs2/bmap.c
> +++ b/fs/nilfs2/bmap.c
> @@ -455,11 +455,14 @@ __u64 nilfs_bmap_find_target_in_group(const struct nilfs_bmap *bmap)
> {
> struct inode *dat = nilfs_bmap_get_dat(bmap);
> unsigned long entries_per_group = nilfs_palloc_entries_per_group(dat);
> - unsigned long group = bmap->b_inode->i_ino / entries_per_group;
Are you sure entries_per_group can be more than 32 bits?
It looks like something that will be the same size on 32 and 64bit.
> + unsigned long group;
> + u32 index;
> +
> + group = div_u64(bmap->b_inode->i_ino, entries_per_group);
You don't need the full 64 by 64 divide.
IIRC there are both div_u64_u32() and div_u64_ulong().
> + div_u64_rem(bmap->b_inode->i_ino, NILFS_BMAP_GROUP_DIV, &index);
NILFD_BMAP_GROUP_DIV is 8 (and probably has to be a power of 2).
So:
index = bmap->b_inode->i_ino & (NILFS_BMAP_GROUP_DIV - 1);
is the same and likely much faster to calculate.
(The compiler will have done that optimisation before.)
David
>
> return group * entries_per_group +
> - (bmap->b_inode->i_ino % NILFS_BMAP_GROUP_DIV) *
> - (entries_per_group / NILFS_BMAP_GROUP_DIV);
> + index * (entries_per_group / NILFS_BMAP_GROUP_DIV);
> }
>
> static struct lock_class_key nilfs_bmap_dat_lock_key;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-14 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-13 18:45 [PATCH v2 0/2] vfs: follow-on fixes for i_ino widening Jeff Layton
2026-03-13 18:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] nilfs2: fix 64-bit division operations in nilfs_bmap_find_target_in_group() Jeff Layton
2026-03-14 12:47 ` David Laight [this message]
2026-03-14 12:59 ` Jeff Layton
2026-03-16 18:06 ` Ryusuke Konishi
2026-03-16 18:50 ` Jeff Layton
2026-03-13 18:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] EVM: add comment describing why ino field is still unsigned long Jeff Layton
2026-03-13 19:50 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260314124748.1ccdf93b@pumpkin \
--to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=slava@dubeyko.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox