From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F29E34C80D for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 13:42:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.135.223.131 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774014133; cv=none; b=nCDRDBJSaWXUkA/KoaD6s8NuxHxASASz4B7zahZdABR3x+Upw77BMP0Jv9p9sX6F34Bp/WL7tEIekdM7IILQlGX45gw3Nt1qZ6p6dJm7n+Ghj/CQ/RX7ccEJYVfy4PDYBmqwIdAIYop1vwXh/S0TkejIcWyWuuif8PVdcdcWc+Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774014133; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nIoejJMaV49gDfeiiXcXv5LH7VzUz9A7WUS7gjGHtc8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=gUoYAIc7FmitYL1XzUV07ay3ZYyK85b2PUw/KqrdA8mpyLs3m2Q4oFbbnrD6d+epiiegHUDoB/qvLcGn+oIvCaYL8kwexO6UkF2m8d1ozdSNukOaWJNj0JNaPEBeaRm4+J8jnXN59zYx3BHSKvtrvaZT0YKQ0i5VnQD+Je2jzMg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.135.223.131 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06EFA5BDFE; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 13:41:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC94A4281B; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 13:41:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id qzzEOZhOvWlXCQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 20 Mar 2026 13:41:44 +0000 Received: by quack3.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 89E72A0B4E; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 14:41:44 +0100 (CET) From: Jan Kara To: Cc: , Christian Brauner , Al Viro , , Ted Tso , "Tigran A. Aivazian" , David Sterba , OGAWA Hirofumi , Muchun Song , Oscar Salvador , David Hildenbrand , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-aio@kvack.org, Benjamin LaHaise , Jan Kara Subject: [PATCH 07/41] exfat: Drop pointless invalidate_inode_buffers() call Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 14:41:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20260320134100.20731-48-jack@suse.cz> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.51.0 In-Reply-To: <20260320131728.6449-1-jack@suse.cz> References: <20260320131728.6449-1-jack@suse.cz> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=642; i=jack@suse.cz; h=from:subject; bh=nIoejJMaV49gDfeiiXcXv5LH7VzUz9A7WUS7gjGHtc8=; b=owEBbQGS/pANAwAIAZydqgc/ZEDZAcsmYgBpvU5yasYuc/oVgtRi89eW1ehL7CYhut2nO3al3 BpSIY98L/yJATMEAAEIAB0WIQSrWdEr1p4yirVVKBycnaoHP2RA2QUCab1OcgAKCRCcnaoHP2RA 2ScCCADbyrlhHTrHVqfs8gou1Q7ALFFXsr0JYh5zHoYogEoF8DE9Jqiu+H9gM0qHvlWQ+tWtR7C DjHQgemIsDeSwPHX2oxkDCVkG5ZuMGRNDrUFlJPugTxja6qVh3isu2iwEdWeHY0EpJ5hvzAwN+q P1gmgEVBbIeMufNmfZqbea7Fh0/PR/rZ/aHEdSnkspmb8AcDn8J4sMLvECHEgYjaALc5MPLVULv y0l+2j8RCTGdgX6yqc5U660NN4lMD/sm5if6lkj0YKB8iBhH7OyMqBlOqV3lpPA/DlIh9LB/isk LlxrEz/xx1EO+3iS+2yRxEWzQlm6WcWD3SuExCvDxebUTted X-Developer-Key: i=jack@suse.cz; a=openpgp; fpr=93C6099A142276A28BBE35D815BC833443038D8C Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 50.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 06EFA5BDFE X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.00 X-Spam-Level: EXFAT never calls mark_buffer_dirty_inode() and thus invalidate_inode_buffers() never has anything to evict. Drop the pointless call. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara --- fs/exfat/inode.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/exfat/inode.c b/fs/exfat/inode.c index 2fb2d2d5d503..04559b88482d 100644 --- a/fs/exfat/inode.c +++ b/fs/exfat/inode.c @@ -695,7 +695,6 @@ void exfat_evict_inode(struct inode *inode) mutex_unlock(&EXFAT_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_lock); } - invalidate_inode_buffers(inode); clear_inode(inode); exfat_cache_inval_inode(inode); exfat_unhash_inode(inode); -- 2.51.0