From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: "Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita" <skoralah@amd.com>
Cc: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>,
<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
"Alison Schofield" <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>,
"Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
"Matthew Wilcox" <willy@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@kernel.org>,
Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>,
Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Ying Huang <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com>,
Yao Xingtao <yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Nathan Fontenot <nathan.fontenot@amd.com>,
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>,
"Benjamin Cheatham" <benjamin.cheatham@amd.com>,
Zhijian Li <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Tomasz Wolski <tomasz.wolski@fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 8/9] dax/hmem, cxl: Defer and resolve Soft Reserved ownership
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 12:12:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260325121211.00007f7e@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <403241c1-36f7-4fd6-bc99-d7dbf30e58f4@amd.com>
On Tue, 24 Mar 2026 14:50:59 -0700
"Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita" <skoralah@amd.com> wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> On 3/23/2026 11:13 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Mar 2026 19:53:41 +0000
> > Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The current probe time ownership check for Soft Reserved memory based
> >> solely on CXL window intersection is insufficient. dax_hmem probing is not
> >> always guaranteed to run after CXL enumeration and region assembly, which
> >> can lead to incorrect ownership decisions before the CXL stack has
> >> finished publishing windows and assembling committed regions.
> >>
> >> Introduce deferred ownership handling for Soft Reserved ranges that
> >> intersect CXL windows. When such a range is encountered during the
> >> initial dax_hmem probe, schedule deferred work to wait for the CXL stack
> >> to complete enumeration and region assembly before deciding ownership.
> >>
> >> Once the deferred work runs, evaluate each Soft Reserved range
> >> individually: if a CXL region fully contains the range, skip it and let
> >> dax_cxl bind. Otherwise, register it with dax_hmem. This per-range
> >> ownership model avoids the need for CXL region teardown and
> >> alloc_dax_region() resource exclusion prevents double claiming.
> >>
> >> Introduce a boolean flag dax_hmem_initial_probe to live inside device.c
> >> so it survives module reload. Ensure dax_cxl defers driver registration
> >> until dax_hmem has completed ownership resolution. dax_cxl calls
> >> dax_hmem_flush_work() before cxl_driver_register(), which both waits for
> >> the deferred work to complete and creates a module symbol dependency that
> >> forces dax_hmem.ko to load before dax_cxl.
> >>
> >> Co-developed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>
> >
> > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260322195343.206900-1-Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa%40amd.com
> > Might be worth a look. I think the last comment is potentially correct
> > though unlikely a platform_driver_register() actually fails.
> >
> > I've not looked too closely at the others. Given this was doing something
> > unusual I thought I'd see what it found. Looks like some interesting
> > questions if nothing else.
>
> Thanks for pointing this out. I went through the findings:
>
> The init error path one is valid I think, if
> platform_driver_register(&dax_hmem_driver) fails after
> dax_hmem_platform_driver has already probed and queued work, the error
> path doesn't flush the work or release the pdev reference.
>
> I was thinking something like below for v9:
>
> @@ -258,8 +262,13 @@ static __init int dax_hmem_init(void)
> return rc;
>
> rc = platform_driver_register(&dax_hmem_driver);
> - if (rc)
> + if (rc) {
> + if (dax_hmem_work.pdev) {
> + flush_work(&dax_hmem_work.work);
> + put_device(&dax_hmem_work.pdev->dev);
> + }
> platform_driver_unregister(&dax_hmem_platform_driver);
> + }
>
> return rc;
> }
>
>
> Worth adding considering the unlikeliness?
I think so. Alternative would be a very obvious comment to say we've
deliberately not handled this corner. Code seems easier to me and
lines up with what remove is doing.
>
> The others I looked at the IS_ENABLED vs IS_REACHABLE question is
> something I'm discussing with Dan in 3/9 (there's a Kconfig dependency
> and CXL_BUS dependency fix needed I guess), the module reload behavior
> is intentional and others are mostly false positives I think..
I was more suspicious of those ones as can never remember exactly what
the effective rule are.
Thanks,
J
>
> Thanks,
> Smita
>
> >
> >> ---
> >> drivers/dax/bus.h | 7 ++++
> >> drivers/dax/cxl.c | 1 +
> >> drivers/dax/hmem/device.c | 3 ++
> >> drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 4 files changed, 85 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/dax/bus.h b/drivers/dax/bus.h
> >> index cbbf64443098..ebbfe2d6da14 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/dax/bus.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/dax/bus.h
> >> @@ -49,6 +49,13 @@ void dax_driver_unregister(struct dax_device_driver *dax_drv);
> >> void kill_dev_dax(struct dev_dax *dev_dax);
> >> bool static_dev_dax(struct dev_dax *dev_dax);
> >>
> >> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEV_DAX_HMEM)
> >> +extern bool dax_hmem_initial_probe;
> >> +void dax_hmem_flush_work(void);
> >> +#else
> >> +static inline void dax_hmem_flush_work(void) { }
> >> +#endif
> >> +
> >> #define MODULE_ALIAS_DAX_DEVICE(type) \
> >> MODULE_ALIAS("dax:t" __stringify(type) "*")
> >> #define DAX_DEVICE_MODALIAS_FMT "dax:t%d"
> >> diff --git a/drivers/dax/cxl.c b/drivers/dax/cxl.c
> >> index a2136adfa186..3ab39b77843d 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/dax/cxl.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/dax/cxl.c
> >> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ static struct cxl_driver cxl_dax_region_driver = {
> >>
> >> static void cxl_dax_region_driver_register(struct work_struct *work)
> >> {
> >> + dax_hmem_flush_work();
> >> cxl_driver_register(&cxl_dax_region_driver);
> >> }
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/dax/hmem/device.c b/drivers/dax/hmem/device.c
> >> index 56e3cbd181b5..991a4bf7d969 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/dax/hmem/device.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/dax/hmem/device.c
> >> @@ -8,6 +8,9 @@
> >> static bool nohmem;
> >> module_param_named(disable, nohmem, bool, 0444);
> >>
> >> +bool dax_hmem_initial_probe;
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_hmem_initial_probe);
> >> +
> >> static bool platform_initialized;
> >> static DEFINE_MUTEX(hmem_resource_lock);
> >> static struct resource hmem_active = {
> >> diff --git a/drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c b/drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c
> >> index ca752db03201..9ceda6b5cadf 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c
> >> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> >> #include <linux/memregion.h>
> >> #include <linux/module.h>
> >> #include <linux/dax.h>
> >> +#include <cxl/cxl.h>
> >> #include "../bus.h"
> >>
> >> static bool region_idle;
> >> @@ -58,6 +59,23 @@ static void release_hmem(void *pdev)
> >> platform_device_unregister(pdev);
> >> }
> >>
> >> +struct dax_defer_work {
> >> + struct platform_device *pdev;
> >> + struct work_struct work;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static void process_defer_work(struct work_struct *w);
> >> +
> >> +static struct dax_defer_work dax_hmem_work = {
> >> + .work = __WORK_INITIALIZER(dax_hmem_work.work, process_defer_work),
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +void dax_hmem_flush_work(void)
> >> +{
> >> + flush_work(&dax_hmem_work.work);
> >> +}
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_hmem_flush_work);
> >> +
> >> static int __hmem_register_device(struct device *host, int target_nid,
> >> const struct resource *res)
> >> {
> >> @@ -122,6 +140,11 @@ static int hmem_register_device(struct device *host, int target_nid,
> >> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEV_DAX_CXL) &&
> >> region_intersects(res->start, resource_size(res), IORESOURCE_MEM,
> >> IORES_DESC_CXL) != REGION_DISJOINT) {
> >> + if (!dax_hmem_initial_probe) {
> >> + dev_dbg(host, "await CXL initial probe: %pr\n", res);
> >> + queue_work(system_long_wq, &dax_hmem_work.work);
> >> + return 0;
> >> + }
> >> dev_dbg(host, "deferring range to CXL: %pr\n", res);
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >> @@ -129,8 +152,54 @@ static int hmem_register_device(struct device *host, int target_nid,
> >> return __hmem_register_device(host, target_nid, res);
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static int hmem_register_cxl_device(struct device *host, int target_nid,
> >> + const struct resource *res)
> >> +{
> >> + if (region_intersects(res->start, resource_size(res), IORESOURCE_MEM,
> >> + IORES_DESC_CXL) == REGION_DISJOINT)
> >> + return 0;
> >> +
> >> + if (cxl_region_contains_resource((struct resource *)res)) {
> >> + dev_dbg(host, "CXL claims resource, dropping: %pr\n", res);
> >> + return 0;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + dev_dbg(host, "CXL did not claim resource, registering: %pr\n", res);
> >> + return __hmem_register_device(host, target_nid, res);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void process_defer_work(struct work_struct *w)
> >> +{
> >> + struct dax_defer_work *work = container_of(w, typeof(*work), work);
> >> + struct platform_device *pdev;
> >> +
> >> + if (!work->pdev)
> >> + return;
> >> +
> >> + pdev = work->pdev;
> >> +
> >> + /* Relies on cxl_acpi and cxl_pci having had a chance to load */
> >> + wait_for_device_probe();
> >> +
> >> + guard(device)(&pdev->dev);
> >> + if (!pdev->dev.driver)
> >> + return;
> >> +
> >> + if (!dax_hmem_initial_probe) {
> >> + dax_hmem_initial_probe = true;
> >> + walk_hmem_resources(&pdev->dev, hmem_register_cxl_device);
> >> + }
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> static int dax_hmem_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> {
> >> + if (work_pending(&dax_hmem_work.work))
> >> + return -EBUSY;
> >> +
> >> + if (!dax_hmem_work.pdev)
> >> + dax_hmem_work.pdev =
> >> + to_platform_device(get_device(&pdev->dev));
> >> +
> >> return walk_hmem_resources(&pdev->dev, hmem_register_device);
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -168,6 +237,11 @@ static __init int dax_hmem_init(void)
> >>
> >> static __exit void dax_hmem_exit(void)
> >> {
> >> + if (dax_hmem_work.pdev) {
> >> + flush_work(&dax_hmem_work.work);
> >> + put_device(&dax_hmem_work.pdev->dev);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> platform_driver_unregister(&dax_hmem_driver);
> >> platform_driver_unregister(&dax_hmem_platform_driver);
> >> }
> >
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-25 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-22 19:53 [PATCH v8 0/9] dax/hmem, cxl: Coordinate Soft Reserved handling with CXL and HMEM Smita Koralahalli
2026-03-22 19:53 ` [PATCH v8 1/9] dax/bus: Use dax_region_put() in alloc_dax_region() error path Smita Koralahalli
2026-03-23 17:11 ` Dave Jiang
2026-03-23 17:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-03-23 19:37 ` Dan Williams
2026-03-22 19:53 ` [PATCH v8 2/9] dax/hmem: Factor HMEM registration into __hmem_register_device() Smita Koralahalli
2026-03-23 17:14 ` Dave Jiang
2026-03-23 17:59 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-03-22 19:53 ` [PATCH v8 3/9] dax/hmem: Request cxl_acpi and cxl_pci before walking Soft Reserved ranges Smita Koralahalli
2026-03-23 19:54 ` Dan Williams
2026-03-24 5:46 ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2026-03-24 16:25 ` Dan Williams
2026-03-22 19:53 ` [PATCH v8 4/9] dax/hmem: Gate Soft Reserved deferral on DEV_DAX_CXL Smita Koralahalli
2026-03-22 19:53 ` [PATCH v8 5/9] dax/cxl, hmem: Initialize hmem early and defer dax_cxl binding Smita Koralahalli
2026-03-22 19:53 ` [PATCH v8 6/9] dax: Track all dax_region allocations under a global resource tree Smita Koralahalli
2026-03-23 17:31 ` Dave Jiang
2026-03-23 20:55 ` Dan Williams
2026-03-22 19:53 ` [PATCH v8 7/9] cxl/region: Add helper to check Soft Reserved containment by CXL regions Smita Koralahalli
2026-03-22 19:53 ` [PATCH v8 8/9] dax/hmem, cxl: Defer and resolve Soft Reserved ownership Smita Koralahalli
2026-03-23 18:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-03-23 18:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-03-24 21:50 ` Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita
2026-03-25 12:12 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-03-23 18:17 ` Dave Jiang
2026-03-22 19:53 ` [PATCH v8 9/9] dax/hmem: Reintroduce Soft Reserved ranges back into the iomem tree Smita Koralahalli
2026-03-23 21:09 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260325121211.00007f7e@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=benjamin.cheatham@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizhijian@fujitsu.com \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=nathan.fontenot@amd.com \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rrichter@amd.com \
--cc=skoralah@amd.com \
--cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
--cc=tomasz.wolski@fujitsu.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yaoxt.fnst@fujitsu.com \
--cc=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox