From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>, axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, miklos@szeredi.hu,
bschubert@ddn.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 7/9] fuse: add io-uring kernel-managed buffer ring
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2026 20:54:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202603282050.aq4eO74Y-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260324224532.3733468-8-joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Hi Joanne,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on mszeredi-fuse/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v7.0-rc5 next-20260327]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Joanne-Koong/fuse-separate-next-request-fetching-from-sending-logic/20260328-142620
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/fuse.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260324224532.3733468-8-joannelkoong%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH v1 7/9] fuse: add io-uring kernel-managed buffer ring
config: hexagon-randconfig-r071-20260328 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260328/202603282050.aq4eO74Y-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 23.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 054e11d1a17e5ba88bb1a8ef32fad3346e80b186)
smatch: v0.5.0-9004-gb810ac53
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260328/202603282050.aq4eO74Y-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603282050.aq4eO74Y-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from fs/fuse/trace.c:6:
>> fs/fuse/dev_uring_i.h:63:16: error: field has incomplete type 'struct kvec'
63 | struct kvec payload_kvec;
| ^
include/linux/mm.h:3010:8: note: forward declaration of 'struct kvec'
3010 | struct kvec;
| ^
1 error generated.
--
In file included from fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:8:
>> fs/fuse/dev_uring_i.h:63:16: error: field has incomplete type 'struct kvec'
63 | struct kvec payload_kvec;
| ^
include/linux/mm.h:3010:8: note: forward declaration of 'struct kvec'
3010 | struct kvec;
| ^
>> fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:296:17: error: call to undeclared function 'io_uring_registered_mem_region_get'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
296 | mem_reg_addr = io_uring_registered_mem_region_get(cmd, &nr_pages,
| ^
>> fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:296:15: error: incompatible integer to pointer conversion assigning to 'void *' from 'int' [-Wint-conversion]
296 | mem_reg_addr = io_uring_registered_mem_region_get(cmd, &nr_pages,
| ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
297 | issue_flags);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:334:8: error: call to undeclared function 'io_uring_buf_ring_pin'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
334 | err = io_uring_buf_ring_pin(cmd, FUSE_URING_BUFRING_GROUP, issue_flags,
| ^
>> fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:339:7: error: call to undeclared function 'io_uring_is_kmbuf_ring'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
339 | if (!io_uring_is_kmbuf_ring(cmd, FUSE_URING_BUFRING_GROUP, issue_flags))
| ^
>> fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:349:2: error: call to undeclared function 'io_uring_buf_ring_unpin'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
349 | io_uring_buf_ring_unpin(cmd, FUSE_URING_BUFRING_GROUP, issue_flags);
| ^
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:400:4: error: call to undeclared function 'io_uring_buf_ring_unpin'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
400 | io_uring_buf_ring_unpin(cmd, FUSE_URING_BUFRING_GROUP,
| ^
>> fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:703:48: error: no member named 'id' in 'struct fuse_ring_ent'
703 | sizeof(struct fuse_uring_req_header) * ent->id;
| ~~~ ^
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:733:48: error: no member named 'id' in 'struct fuse_ring_ent'
733 | sizeof(struct fuse_uring_req_header) * ent->id;
| ~~~ ^
>> fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:771:18: error: no member named 'payload_kvec' in 'struct fuse_ring_ent'
771 | cs->len = ent->payload_kvec.iov_len;
| ~~~ ^
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:772:20: error: no member named 'payload_kvec' in 'struct fuse_ring_ent'
772 | cs->kaddr = ent->payload_kvec.iov_base;
| ~~~ ^
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:903:8: error: call to undeclared function 'io_ring_buffer_select'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
903 | sel = io_ring_buffer_select(cmd_to_io_kiocb(ent->cmd), &len,
| ^
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:903:8: note: did you mean 'io_uring_cmd_buffer_select'?
include/linux/io_uring/cmd.h:83:18: note: 'io_uring_cmd_buffer_select' declared here
83 | struct io_br_sel io_uring_cmd_buffer_select(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd,
| ^
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:903:6: error: assigning to 'struct io_br_sel' from incompatible type 'int'
903 | sel = io_ring_buffer_select(cmd_to_io_kiocb(ent->cmd), &len,
| ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
904 | ent->queue->bufring.list, issue_flags);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:907:11: error: no member named 'kaddr' in 'struct io_br_sel'
907 | if (!sel.kaddr)
| ~~~ ^
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:910:7: error: no member named 'payload_kvec' in 'struct fuse_ring_ent'
910 | ent->payload_kvec.iov_base = sel.kaddr;
| ~~~ ^
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:910:35: error: no member named 'kaddr' in 'struct io_br_sel'
910 | ent->payload_kvec.iov_base = sel.kaddr;
| ~~~ ^
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:911:7: error: no member named 'payload_kvec' in 'struct fuse_ring_ent'
911 | ent->payload_kvec.iov_len = len;
| ~~~ ^
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:912:7: error: no member named 'buf_id' in 'struct fuse_ring_ent'
912 | ent->buf_id = sel.buf_id;
| ~~~ ^
fs/fuse/dev_uring.c:912:20: error: no member named 'buf_id' in 'struct io_br_sel'
912 | ent->buf_id = sel.buf_id;
| ~~~ ^
fatal error: too many errors emitted, stopping now [-ferror-limit=]
20 errors generated.
vim +63 fs/fuse/dev_uring_i.h
38
39 /** A fuse ring entry, part of the ring queue */
40 struct fuse_ring_ent {
41 union {
42 /* queue->bufring.enabled == false */
43 struct {
44 /* userspace buffers */
45 struct fuse_uring_req_header __user *headers;
46 void __user *payload;
47 };
48 /* queue->bufring.enabled == true */
49 struct {
50 /*
51 * unique fixed id for the ent. Used by kernel/server to
52 * locate the header data.
53 */
54 unsigned int id;
55 /*
56 * id of the bufring buffer the ent is using for the
57 * current request. May differ per-request.
58 *
59 * this needs to be tracked so we can recycle the buffer
60 * back to the ring when the request is done.
61 */
62 unsigned int buf_id;
> 63 struct kvec payload_kvec;
64 };
65 };
66
67 /* the ring queue that owns the request */
68 struct fuse_ring_queue *queue;
69
70 /* fields below are protected by queue->lock */
71
72 struct io_uring_cmd *cmd;
73
74 struct list_head list;
75
76 enum fuse_ring_req_state state;
77
78 struct fuse_req *fuse_req;
79 };
80
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-28 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-24 22:45 [PATCH v1 0/9] fuse: add io-uring buffer rings and zero-copy Joanne Koong
2026-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH v1 1/9] fuse: separate next request fetching from sending logic Joanne Koong
2026-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH v1 2/9] fuse: refactor io-uring header copying to ring Joanne Koong
2026-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH v1 3/9] fuse: refactor io-uring header copying from ring Joanne Koong
2026-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH v1 4/9] fuse: use enum types for header copying Joanne Koong
2026-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH v1 5/9] fuse: refactor setting up copy state for payload copying Joanne Koong
2026-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH v1 6/9] fuse: support buffer copying for kernel addresses Joanne Koong
2026-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH v1 7/9] fuse: add io-uring kernel-managed buffer ring Joanne Koong
2026-03-28 12:21 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-28 12:54 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2026-03-28 13:27 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-30 21:28 ` Bernd Schubert
2026-03-30 23:19 ` Joanne Koong
2026-03-31 21:30 ` Bernd Schubert
2026-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH v1 8/9] fuse: add zero-copy over io-uring Joanne Koong
2026-03-28 13:02 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-28 13:53 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-30 15:43 ` Joanne Koong
2026-03-31 3:35 ` Philip Li
2026-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH v1 9/9] docs: fuse: add io-uring bufring and zero-copy documentation Joanne Koong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202603282050.aq4eO74Y-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bschubert@ddn.com \
--cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox