From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Cc: sj1557.seo@samsung.com, yuezhang.mo@sony.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, anmuxixixi@gmail.com,
dxdt@dev.snart.me, chizhiling@kylinos.cn, chizhiling@163.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] exfat: add iomap buffered I/O support
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 08:38:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260330063821.GC5897@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260326115045.9525-4-linkinjeon@kernel.org>
> -#define EXFAT_CLU_TO_B(b, sbi) ((b) << (sbi)->cluster_size_bits)
> +#define EXFAT_CLU_TO_B(b, sbi) ((loff_t)(b) << (sbi)->cluster_size_bits)
This should be a prep patch.
> if ((attr->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE) &&
> attr->ia_size > i_size_read(inode)) {
> + loff_t old_size = i_size_read(inode);
> +
> error = exfat_cont_expand(inode, attr->ia_size);
> + if (!error && attr->ia_size > old_size &&
> + old_size % PAGE_SIZE != 0) {
> + loff_t len = min_t(loff_t,
> + round_up(old_size, PAGE_SIZE) - old_size,
> + attr->ia_size - old_size);
> + error = iomap_zero_range(inode, old_size, len,
> + NULL, &exfat_read_iomap_ops,
> + &exfat_iomap_folio_ops, NULL);
> + }
Why is this needed for iomap? Shouldn't explicit zeroing on size change
be a prep patch?
> if (unlikely(exfat_forced_shutdown(inode->i_sb)))
> return -EIO;
>
> - err = __generic_file_fsync(filp, start, end, datasync);
> + err = file_write_and_wait_range(filp, start, end);
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> + if (!datasync)
> + err = __exfat_write_inode(inode, 1);
> + write_inode_now(inode, !datasync);
This seems to have lost the i_state check to see if a sync
is needed before __exfat_write_inode. Also doing write_inode_now
plus the explicit inode sync seems duplicate. Last but not least
I don't understand how this is related to iomap?
> + ssize_t ret;
> +
> + ret = iomap_dio_rw(iocb, from, &exfat_write_iomap_ops,
> + &exfat_write_dio_ops, 0, NULL, 0);
> + if (ret == -ENOTBLK)
> + ret = 0;
> + else if (ret < 0)
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (iov_iter_count(from)) {
> + loff_t offset, end;
> + ssize_t written;
> + int ret2;
> +
> + offset = iocb->ki_pos;
> + iocb->ki_flags &= ~IOCB_DIRECT;
> + written = iomap_file_buffered_write(iocb, from,
> + &exfat_write_iomap_ops, &exfat_iomap_folio_ops,
> + NULL);
> + if (written < 0) {
> + ret = written;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + ret += written;
> + end = iocb->ki_pos + written - 1;
> + ret2 = filemap_write_and_wait_range(iocb->ki_filp->f_mapping,
> + offset, end);
> + if (ret2) {
> + ret = -EIO;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + if (!ret2)
> + invalidate_mapping_pages(iocb->ki_filp->f_mapping,
> + offset >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> + end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> + }
Eventually we should factor this code int oa common helper. Not needed
for this submission, though.
> {
> - int err;
> struct inode *inode = file_inode(vmf->vma->vm_file);
> - struct exfat_inode_info *ei = EXFAT_I(inode);
> - loff_t new_valid_size;
> + vm_fault_t ret;
>
> if (!inode_trylock(inode))
> return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
>
> - new_valid_size = ((loff_t)vmf->pgoff + 1) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> - new_valid_size = min(new_valid_size, i_size_read(inode));
> -
> - if (ei->valid_size < new_valid_size) {
> - err = exfat_extend_valid_size(inode, new_valid_size, false);
Why is this moving out? I think the zeroing changes in this patch
are really something that should be split out and explained in the
commit log for better understanding and bisectability.
> +static int exfat_file_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + if (unlikely(exfat_forced_shutdown(inode->i_sb)))
> + return -EIO;
This doesn't look iomap-related.
> +
> + err = generic_file_open(inode, filp);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + filp->f_mode |= FMODE_CAN_ODIRECT;
This should go into the previous patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-30 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-26 11:50 [PATCH 0/5] exfat: convert to iomap Namjae Jeon
2026-03-26 11:50 ` [PATCH 1/5] exfat: add iomap support Namjae Jeon
2026-03-30 2:45 ` Chi Zhiling
2026-03-31 5:29 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-03-30 6:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31 5:26 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-03-31 5:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31 6:44 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-04-01 3:07 ` Chi Zhiling
2026-04-01 2:24 ` Yuezhang.Mo
2026-04-01 2:47 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-04-06 13:45 ` David Timber
2026-04-06 14:13 ` David Timber
2026-03-26 11:50 ` [PATCH 2/5] exfat: add iomap direct I/O support Namjae Jeon
2026-03-30 6:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31 5:23 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-03-26 11:50 ` [PATCH 3/5] exfat: add iomap buffered " Namjae Jeon
2026-03-30 6:38 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-03-31 5:22 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-03-31 5:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31 6:36 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-03-31 6:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31 6:58 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-04-06 13:09 ` David Timber
2026-04-07 6:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-26 11:50 ` [PATCH 4/5] exfat: add support for multi-cluster allocation Namjae Jeon
2026-03-26 11:50 ` [PATCH 5/5] exfat: add support for SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA in llseek Namjae Jeon
2026-03-30 6:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31 4:55 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-03-27 6:33 ` [PATCH 0/5] exfat: convert to iomap Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-27 6:46 ` Namjae Jeon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260330063821.GC5897@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=anmuxixixi@gmail.com \
--cc=chizhiling@163.com \
--cc=chizhiling@kylinos.cn \
--cc=dxdt@dev.snart.me \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sj1557.seo@samsung.com \
--cc=yuezhang.mo@sony.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox