From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
patches@lists.linux.dev, Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
netfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.19 335/342] netfs: Fix the handling of stream->front by removing it
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 18:22:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260331161811.229757268@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260331161758.909578033@linuxfoundation.org>
6.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit 0e764b9d46071668969410ec5429be0e2f38c6d3 ]
The netfs_io_stream::front member is meant to point to the subrequest
currently being collected on a stream, but it isn't actually used this way
by direct write (which mostly ignores it). However, there's a tracepoint
which looks at it. Further, stream->front is actually redundant with
stream->subrequests.next.
Fix the potential problem in the direct code by just removing the member
and using stream->subrequests.next instead, thereby also simplifying the
code.
Fixes: a0b4c7a49137 ("netfs: Fix unbuffered/DIO writes to dispatch subrequests in strict sequence")
Reported-by: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/4158599.1774426817@warthog.procyon.org.uk
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara (Red Hat) <pc@manguebit.org>
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
fs/netfs/buffered_read.c | 3 +--
fs/netfs/direct_read.c | 3 +--
fs/netfs/direct_write.c | 1 -
fs/netfs/read_collect.c | 4 ++--
fs/netfs/read_single.c | 1 -
fs/netfs/write_collect.c | 4 ++--
fs/netfs/write_issue.c | 3 +--
include/linux/netfs.h | 1 -
include/trace/events/netfs.h | 8 ++++----
9 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c b/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
index 37ab6f28b5ad0..88361e8c70961 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
@@ -171,9 +171,8 @@ static void netfs_queue_read(struct netfs_io_request *rreq,
spin_lock(&rreq->lock);
list_add_tail(&subreq->rreq_link, &stream->subrequests);
if (list_is_first(&subreq->rreq_link, &stream->subrequests)) {
- stream->front = subreq;
if (!stream->active) {
- stream->collected_to = stream->front->start;
+ stream->collected_to = subreq->start;
/* Store list pointers before active flag */
smp_store_release(&stream->active, true);
}
diff --git a/fs/netfs/direct_read.c b/fs/netfs/direct_read.c
index a498ee8d66745..f72e6da88cca7 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/direct_read.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/direct_read.c
@@ -71,9 +71,8 @@ static int netfs_dispatch_unbuffered_reads(struct netfs_io_request *rreq)
spin_lock(&rreq->lock);
list_add_tail(&subreq->rreq_link, &stream->subrequests);
if (list_is_first(&subreq->rreq_link, &stream->subrequests)) {
- stream->front = subreq;
if (!stream->active) {
- stream->collected_to = stream->front->start;
+ stream->collected_to = subreq->start;
/* Store list pointers before active flag */
smp_store_release(&stream->active, true);
}
diff --git a/fs/netfs/direct_write.c b/fs/netfs/direct_write.c
index 4d9760e36c119..f9ab69de3e298 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/direct_write.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/direct_write.c
@@ -111,7 +111,6 @@ static int netfs_unbuffered_write(struct netfs_io_request *wreq)
netfs_prepare_write(wreq, stream, wreq->start + wreq->transferred);
subreq = stream->construct;
stream->construct = NULL;
- stream->front = NULL;
}
/* Check if (re-)preparation failed. */
diff --git a/fs/netfs/read_collect.c b/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
index 137f0e28a44c5..e5f6665b3341e 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
@@ -205,7 +205,8 @@ static void netfs_collect_read_results(struct netfs_io_request *rreq)
* in progress. The issuer thread may be adding stuff to the tail
* whilst we're doing this.
*/
- front = READ_ONCE(stream->front);
+ front = list_first_entry_or_null(&stream->subrequests,
+ struct netfs_io_subrequest, rreq_link);
while (front) {
size_t transferred;
@@ -301,7 +302,6 @@ static void netfs_collect_read_results(struct netfs_io_request *rreq)
list_del_init(&front->rreq_link);
front = list_first_entry_or_null(&stream->subrequests,
struct netfs_io_subrequest, rreq_link);
- stream->front = front;
spin_unlock(&rreq->lock);
netfs_put_subrequest(remove,
notes & ABANDON_SREQ ?
diff --git a/fs/netfs/read_single.c b/fs/netfs/read_single.c
index 8e6264f62a8f3..d0e23bc42445f 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/read_single.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/read_single.c
@@ -107,7 +107,6 @@ static int netfs_single_dispatch_read(struct netfs_io_request *rreq)
spin_lock(&rreq->lock);
list_add_tail(&subreq->rreq_link, &stream->subrequests);
trace_netfs_sreq(subreq, netfs_sreq_trace_added);
- stream->front = subreq;
/* Store list pointers before active flag */
smp_store_release(&stream->active, true);
spin_unlock(&rreq->lock);
diff --git a/fs/netfs/write_collect.c b/fs/netfs/write_collect.c
index 83eb3dc1adf8a..b194447f4b111 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/write_collect.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/write_collect.c
@@ -228,7 +228,8 @@ static void netfs_collect_write_results(struct netfs_io_request *wreq)
if (!smp_load_acquire(&stream->active))
continue;
- front = stream->front;
+ front = list_first_entry_or_null(&stream->subrequests,
+ struct netfs_io_subrequest, rreq_link);
while (front) {
trace_netfs_collect_sreq(wreq, front);
//_debug("sreq [%x] %llx %zx/%zx",
@@ -279,7 +280,6 @@ static void netfs_collect_write_results(struct netfs_io_request *wreq)
list_del_init(&front->rreq_link);
front = list_first_entry_or_null(&stream->subrequests,
struct netfs_io_subrequest, rreq_link);
- stream->front = front;
spin_unlock(&wreq->lock);
netfs_put_subrequest(remove,
notes & SAW_FAILURE ?
diff --git a/fs/netfs/write_issue.c b/fs/netfs/write_issue.c
index 437268f656409..2db688f941251 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/write_issue.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/write_issue.c
@@ -206,9 +206,8 @@ void netfs_prepare_write(struct netfs_io_request *wreq,
spin_lock(&wreq->lock);
list_add_tail(&subreq->rreq_link, &stream->subrequests);
if (list_is_first(&subreq->rreq_link, &stream->subrequests)) {
- stream->front = subreq;
if (!stream->active) {
- stream->collected_to = stream->front->start;
+ stream->collected_to = subreq->start;
/* Write list pointers before active flag */
smp_store_release(&stream->active, true);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/netfs.h b/include/linux/netfs.h
index 72ee7d210a744..ba17ac5bf356a 100644
--- a/include/linux/netfs.h
+++ b/include/linux/netfs.h
@@ -140,7 +140,6 @@ struct netfs_io_stream {
void (*issue_write)(struct netfs_io_subrequest *subreq);
/* Collection tracking */
struct list_head subrequests; /* Contributory I/O operations */
- struct netfs_io_subrequest *front; /* Op being collected */
unsigned long long collected_to; /* Position we've collected results to */
size_t transferred; /* The amount transferred from this stream */
unsigned short error; /* Aggregate error for the stream */
diff --git a/include/trace/events/netfs.h b/include/trace/events/netfs.h
index 2d366be46a1c3..cbe28211106c5 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/netfs.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/netfs.h
@@ -740,19 +740,19 @@ TRACE_EVENT(netfs_collect_stream,
__field(unsigned int, wreq)
__field(unsigned char, stream)
__field(unsigned long long, collected_to)
- __field(unsigned long long, front)
+ __field(unsigned long long, issued_to)
),
TP_fast_assign(
__entry->wreq = wreq->debug_id;
__entry->stream = stream->stream_nr;
__entry->collected_to = stream->collected_to;
- __entry->front = stream->front ? stream->front->start : UINT_MAX;
+ __entry->issued_to = atomic64_read(&wreq->issued_to);
),
- TP_printk("R=%08x[%x:] cto=%llx frn=%llx",
+ TP_printk("R=%08x[%x:] cto=%llx ito=%llx",
__entry->wreq, __entry->stream,
- __entry->collected_to, __entry->front)
+ __entry->collected_to, __entry->issued_to)
);
TRACE_EVENT(netfs_folioq,
--
2.53.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-31 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260331161758.909578033@linuxfoundation.org>
2026-03-31 16:22 ` [PATCH 6.19 330/342] netfs: Fix read abandonment during retry Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-03-31 16:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260331161811.229757268@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pc@manguebit.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox