public inbox for linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: bschubert@ddn.com
Cc: miklos@szeredi.hu, neal@gompa.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	bernd@bsbernd.com, joannelkoong@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] mount_service: enable unprivileged users in the same manner as fusermount
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:01:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260417220127.GE7727@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260414235349.GE604658@frogsfrogsfrogs>

On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 04:53:49PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 03:22:38PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> > 
> > Some Linux distributions allow unprivileged users to mount fuse
> > filesystems through the use of the setuid fusermount helper program.  It
> > would be useful to provide similar functionality when mounting a
> > filesystem that runs as a systemd service.
> > 
> > Therefore, read the fuse config file and implement the same checks as
> > fusermount.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  util/mount_service.c |  150 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 147 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > 
> > diff --git a/util/mount_service.c b/util/mount_service.c
> > index 8e9c721a56fd2a..0f7eae94ada377 100644
> > --- a/util/mount_service.c
> > +++ b/util/mount_service.c
> > @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
> >  #include "fuse_i.h"
> >  #include "fuse_service_priv.h"
> >  #include "mount_service.h"
> > +#include "fuser_conf.h"
> >  
> >  struct mount_service {
> >  	/* prefix for printing error messages */
> > @@ -166,7 +167,9 @@ static int mount_service_connect(struct mount_service *mo)
> >  		return -1;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	drop_privs();
> >  	ret = connect(sockfd, (const struct sockaddr *)&name, sizeof(name));
> > +	restore_privs();
> >  	if (ret && (errno == ENOENT || errno == ECONNREFUSED)) {

Oops, here I missed that the syscalls under restore_privs() could fail,
thereby blowing away errno.  This should of course be:

	drop_privs();
	ret = connect(...);
	if (ret && (errno == ENOENT || errno == ECONNREFUSED)) {
		restore_privs();
		/* rest of error stuff */
	}


> >  		fprintf(stderr, "%s: no safe filesystem driver for %s available.\n",
> >  			mo->msgtag, mo->subtype);
> > @@ -208,7 +211,7 @@ static int mount_service_send_hello(struct mount_service *mo)
> >  	};
> >  	ssize_t size;
> >  
> > -	if (getuid() == 0)
> > +	if (getuid() == 0 || user_allow_other)
> >  		hello.flags |= htonl(FUSE_SERVICE_FLAG_ALLOW_OTHER);
> >  
> >  	size = sendmsg(mo->sockfd, &msg, MSG_EOR | MSG_NOSIGNAL);
> > @@ -490,7 +493,9 @@ static int mount_service_send_required_files(struct mount_service *mo,
> >  {
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> > +	drop_privs();
> >  	mo->fusedevfd = open(fusedev, O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC);
> > +	restore_privs();

Here too.

> >  	if (mo->fusedevfd < 0) {
> >  		fprintf(stderr, "%s: %s: %s\n",
> >  			mo->msgtag, fusedev, strerror(errno));
> > @@ -628,7 +633,9 @@ static int prepare_bdev(struct mount_service *mo,
> >  	if (oc->block_size) {
> >  		int block_size = ntohl(oc->block_size);
> >  
> > +		drop_privs();
> >  		ret = ioctl(fd, BLKBSZSET, &block_size);
> > +		restore_privs();
> >  		if (ret) {
> >  			int error = errno;
> >  
> > @@ -675,7 +682,9 @@ static int mount_service_open_path(struct mount_service *mo,
> >  		return mount_service_send_file_error(mo, EINVAL, oc->path);
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	fd = open(oc->path, ntohl(oc->open_flags), ntohl(oc->create_mode));
> > +	drop_privs();
> > +	fd = open(oc->path, ntohl(oc->open_flags) | O_CLOEXEC, ntohl(oc->create_mode));
> > +	restore_privs();

And here.

> >  	if (fd < 0) {
> >  		int error = errno;
> >  
> > @@ -908,6 +917,20 @@ static int mount_service_handle_mntopts_cmd(struct mount_service *mo,

mount_service_handle_mntopts_cmd and mount_service_handle_source_cmd
ought only to set mo->mntopts and mo->source at the very end, if
everything that before it succeeded.

> >  			*equals = 0;
> >  		}
> >  
> > +		if (getuid() != 0 && !user_allow_other &&
> > +		    (!strcmp(tok, "allow_other") ||
> > +		     !strcmp(tok, "allow_root"))) {
> > +			fprintf(stderr,
> > +"%s: option %s only allowed if 'user_allow_other' is set in %s\n",
> > +				mo->msgtag, tok, FUSE_CONF);
> > +			return mount_service_send_reply(mo, EPERM);
> > +		}
> > +		if (!strcmp(tok, "blkdev") && getuid() != 0) {
> 
> blkdev is an internal mount option that libfuse never sends to the
> kernel, so there's no need to check it here either.  Sending "blkdev" to
> the kernel will just cause mount() EINVAL failures.
> 
> 
> > +			fprintf(stderr, "%s: option blkdev is privileged\n",
> > +				mo->msgtag);
> > +			return mount_service_send_reply(mo, EPERM);
> > +		}
> > +
> >  #ifdef HAVE_NEW_MOUNT_API
> >  		if (mo->fsopenfd >= 0) {
> >  			int ret;
> > @@ -985,10 +1008,16 @@ static int attach_to_mountpoint(struct mount_service *mo, char *mntpt)
> >  	int error;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> > +	drop_privs();
> > +
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Open the alleged mountpoint, make sure it's a dir or a file.
> > +	 * For unprivileged callers, we only allow mounting on paths that the
> > +	 * user can write to.
> >  	 */
> > -	mountfd = open(mntpt, O_RDONLY | O_CLOEXEC);
> > +	mountfd = open(mntpt, (getuid() == 0 ? O_RDONLY : O_WRONLY) | O_CLOEXEC);
> > +	if (mountfd < 0 && errno == EISDIR)
> > +		mountfd = open(mntpt, O_RDONLY | O_CLOEXEC);
> 
> This mess!
> 
> This might add a new requirement that the unprivileged caller has to
> have read access to the mountpoint.  This isn't explicitly checked in
> fusermount, but I'm pretty sure that the lstat in fusermount will fail
> with EACCESS.
> 
> That said, if we're unprivileged and fall back to opening readonly, then
> we should require that the fd point to a directory.  Note that the
> access check just prior to mount()/fsmount() will confirm that the
> unprivileged caller could (at least in theory) create a new child entry.
> 
> --D
> 
> >  	if (mountfd < 0) {
> >  		error = errno;
> >  		fprintf(stderr, "%s: %s: %s\n", mo->msgtag, mntpt,
> > @@ -1067,6 +1096,7 @@ static int attach_to_mountpoint(struct mount_service *mo, char *mntpt)
> >  	mo->mountfd = mountfd;
> >  	mo->resv_mountpoint = res_mntpt;
> >  
> > +	restore_privs();
> >  	return mount_service_send_reply(mo, 0);
> >  
> >  out_res_mntpt:
> > @@ -1075,6 +1105,7 @@ static int attach_to_mountpoint(struct mount_service *mo, char *mntpt)
> >  	close(mountfd);
> >  out_error:
> >  	free(mntpt);
> > +	restore_privs();
> >  	return mount_service_send_reply(mo, error);
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -1399,6 +1430,77 @@ static int mount_service_fsopen_mount(struct mount_service *mo,
> >  # define mount_service_fsopen_mount(...)	(FUSE_MOUNT_FALLBACK_NEEDED)
> >  #endif
> >  
> > +static int check_nonroot_file_access(struct mount_service *mo)
> > +{
> > +	struct stat sb1, sb2;
> > +	int fd;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If we already succeeded in opening the file with write access, then
> > +	 * we're good.
> > +	 */
> > +	ret = fcntl(mo->mountfd, F_GETFL);
> > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > +		int error = errno;
> > +
> > +		fprintf(stderr, "%s: %s: %s\n", mo->msgtag, mo->mountpoint,
> > +			strerror(error));
> > +		return -1;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if ((ret & O_ACCMODE) != O_RDONLY)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	ret = fstat(mo->mountfd, &sb1);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		int error = errno;
> > +
> > +		fprintf(stderr, "%s: %s: %s\n",
> > +			mo->msgtag, mo->mountpoint, strerror(error));
> > +		return -1;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Try to reopen the file with write access this time. */
> > +	fd = open(mo->real_mountpoint, O_WRONLY | O_CLOEXEC);
> > +	if (fd < 0) {
> > +		int error = errno;
> > +
> > +		fprintf(stderr, "%s: %s: %s\n",
> > +			mo->msgtag, mo->mountpoint, strerror(error));
> > +		return -1;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Is this the same file? */
> > +	ret = fstat(fd, &sb2);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		int error = errno;
> > +
> > +		fprintf(stderr, "%s: %s: %s\n",
> > +			mo->msgtag, mo->mountpoint, strerror(error));
> > +		goto out_fd;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (sb1.st_dev != sb2.st_dev || sb1.st_ino != sb2.st_ino) {
> > +		fprintf(stderr, "%s: %s: Mount point moved during fuse startup.\n",
> > +			mo->msgtag, mo->mountpoint);
> > +		ret = -1;
> > +		goto out_fd;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * We reopened the same file with write access, everything is ok.  Swap
> > +	 * the two file descriptors so that we retain our write access.
> > +	 */
> > +	ret = mo->mountfd;
> > +	mo->mountfd = fd;
> > +	fd = ret;
> > +	ret = 0;
> > +out_fd:
> > +	close(fd);
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int mount_service_handle_mount_cmd(struct mount_service *mo,
> >  					  struct fuse_service_packet *p,
> >  					  size_t psz)
> > @@ -1471,6 +1573,44 @@ static int mount_service_handle_mount_cmd(struct mount_service *mo,
> >  		return mount_service_send_reply(mo, EINVAL);
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * fuse.conf can limit the number of unprivileged fuse mounts.
> > +	 * For unprivileged mounts (via setuid) we also require write access
> > +	 * to the mountpoint, and we'll only accept certain underlying
> > +	 * filesystems.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (getuid() != 0) {
> > +		struct statfs fs_buf;
> > +
> > +		ret = check_nonroot_mount_count(mo->msgtag);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			return mount_service_send_reply(mo, EUSERS);
> > +
> > +		ret = fstatfs(mo->mountfd, &fs_buf);
> > +		if (ret) {
> > +			int error = errno;
> > +
> > +			fprintf(stderr, "%s: %s: %s\n",
> > +				mo->msgtag, mo->mountpoint, strerror(error));
> > +			return mount_service_send_reply(mo, error);
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		drop_privs();
> > +		if (S_ISDIR(stbuf.st_mode))
> > +			ret = check_nonroot_dir_access(mo->msgtag,
> > +						       mo->mountpoint,
> > +						       mo->real_mountpoint,
> > +						       &stbuf);
> > +		else
> > +			ret = check_nonroot_file_access(mo);
> > +		if (!ret)
> > +			ret = check_nonroot_fstype(mo->msgtag, &fs_buf);
> > +		restore_privs();
> > +
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			return mount_service_send_reply(mo, EPERM);

Codex points out that fusermount grumps and sets MS_NOSUID|MS_NODEV
unconditionally, so we should do that too.  I see that there's a
"mount_flags" table in fusermount.c, so I'll use that as the basis for
forcing flags.

--D

> > +	}
> > +
> >  	if (mo->fsopenfd >= 0) {
> >  		ret = mount_service_fsopen_mount(mo, oc, &stbuf);
> >  		if (ret != FUSE_MOUNT_FALLBACK_NEEDED)
> > @@ -1601,6 +1741,10 @@ int mount_service_main(int argc, char *argv[])
> >  	else
> >  		mo.msgtag = "mount.service";
> >  
> > +	drop_privs();
> > +	read_conf(mo.msgtag);
> > +	restore_privs();
> > +
> >  	ret = mount_service_init(&mo, argc, argv);
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return EXIT_FAILURE;
> > 
> > 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-17 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-09 22:20 [PATCHSET v4] libfuse: run fuse servers as a contained service Darrick J. Wong
2026-04-09 22:20 ` [PATCH 01/13] Refactor mount code / move common functions to mount_util.c Darrick J. Wong
2026-04-09 22:21 ` [PATCH 02/13] mount_service: add systemd/inetd socket service mounting helper Darrick J. Wong
2026-04-14  1:00   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-04-14 23:48   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-04-17 23:19   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-04-09 22:21 ` [PATCH 03/13] mount_service: create high level fuse helpers Darrick J. Wong
2026-04-14 23:58   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-04-09 22:21 ` [PATCH 04/13] mount_service: use the new mount api for the mount service Darrick J. Wong
2026-04-17 22:03   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-04-09 22:21 ` [PATCH 05/13] mount_service: update mtab after a successful mount Darrick J. Wong
2026-04-09 22:22 ` [PATCH 06/13] util: hoist the fuse.conf parsing and setuid mode enforcement code Darrick J. Wong
2026-04-09 22:22 ` [PATCH 07/13] util: fix checkpatch complaints in fuser_conf.[ch] Darrick J. Wong
2026-04-09 22:22 ` [PATCH 08/13] mount_service: enable unprivileged users in the same manner as fusermount Darrick J. Wong
2026-04-14 23:53   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-04-17 22:01     ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-04-09 22:22 ` [PATCH 09/13] mount.fuse3: integrate systemd service startup Darrick J. Wong
2026-04-17 22:41   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-04-09 22:23 ` [PATCH 10/13] mount_service: allow installation as a setuid program Darrick J. Wong
2026-04-09 22:23 ` [PATCH 11/13] example/service_ll: create a sample systemd service fuse server Darrick J. Wong
2026-04-14 23:56   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-04-17 21:56   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-04-09 22:23 ` [PATCH 12/13] example/service: create a sample systemd service for a high-level " Darrick J. Wong
2026-04-09 22:23 ` [PATCH 13/13] nullfs: support fuse systemd service mode Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260417220127.GE7727@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=bernd@bsbernd.com \
    --cc=bschubert@ddn.com \
    --cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=neal@gompa.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox