public inbox for linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org>,
	netfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 03/11] netfs: Fix potential UAF in netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages()
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 09:36:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260420083705.1009074-4-dhowells@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260420083705.1009074-1-dhowells@redhat.com>

netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages(rreq) accesses the index of the folios it
is wanting to unlock and compares that to rreq->no_unlock_folio so that it
doesn't unlock a folio being read for netfs_perform_write() or
netfs_write_begin().

However, given that netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages() is called _after_
NETFS_RREQ_IN_PROGRESS is cleared, the one folio that it's not allowed to
dereference is the one specified by ->no_unlock_folio as ownership
immediately reverts to the caller.

Fix this by storing the folio pointer instead and using that rather than
the index.  Also fix netfs_unlock_read_folio() where the same applies.

Fixes: ee4cdf7ba857 ("netfs: Speed up buffered reading")
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260414082004.3756080-1-dhowells%40redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org>
cc: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
---
 fs/netfs/buffered_read.c | 4 ++--
 fs/netfs/read_collect.c  | 2 +-
 fs/netfs/read_retry.c    | 2 +-
 include/linux/netfs.h    | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c b/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
index 51caad535438..b4d271538f75 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ int netfs_write_begin(struct netfs_inode *ctx,
 		ret = PTR_ERR(rreq);
 		goto error;
 	}
-	rreq->no_unlock_folio	= folio->index;
+	rreq->no_unlock_folio	= folio;
 	__set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_NO_UNLOCK_FOLIO, &rreq->flags);
 
 	ret = netfs_begin_cache_read(rreq, ctx);
@@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ int netfs_prefetch_for_write(struct file *file, struct folio *folio,
 		goto error;
 	}
 
-	rreq->no_unlock_folio = folio->index;
+	rreq->no_unlock_folio = folio;
 	__set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_NO_UNLOCK_FOLIO, &rreq->flags);
 	ret = netfs_begin_cache_read(rreq, ctx);
 	if (ret == -ENOMEM || ret == -EINTR || ret == -ERESTARTSYS)
diff --git a/fs/netfs/read_collect.c b/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
index e5f6665b3341..eae067e3eaa5 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static void netfs_unlock_read_folio(struct netfs_io_request *rreq,
 	}
 
 just_unlock:
-	if (folio->index == rreq->no_unlock_folio &&
+	if (folio == rreq->no_unlock_folio &&
 	    test_bit(NETFS_RREQ_NO_UNLOCK_FOLIO, &rreq->flags)) {
 		_debug("no unlock");
 	} else {
diff --git a/fs/netfs/read_retry.c b/fs/netfs/read_retry.c
index 68fc869513ef..999177426141 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/read_retry.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/read_retry.c
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ void netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages(struct netfs_io_request *rreq)
 			struct folio *folio = folioq_folio(p, slot);
 
 			if (folio && !folioq_is_marked2(p, slot)) {
-				if (folio->index == rreq->no_unlock_folio &&
+				if (folio == rreq->no_unlock_folio &&
 				    test_bit(NETFS_RREQ_NO_UNLOCK_FOLIO,
 					     &rreq->flags)) {
 					_debug("no unlock");
diff --git a/include/linux/netfs.h b/include/linux/netfs.h
index ba17ac5bf356..62a528f90666 100644
--- a/include/linux/netfs.h
+++ b/include/linux/netfs.h
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ struct netfs_io_request {
 	unsigned long long	collected_to;	/* Point we've collected to */
 	unsigned long long	cleaned_to;	/* Position we've cleaned folios to */
 	unsigned long long	abandon_to;	/* Position to abandon folios to */
-	pgoff_t			no_unlock_folio; /* Don't unlock this folio after read */
+	const struct folio	*no_unlock_folio; /* Don't unlock this folio after read */
 	unsigned int		direct_bv_count; /* Number of elements in direct_bv[] */
 	unsigned int		debug_id;
 	unsigned int		rsize;		/* Maximum read size (0 for none) */


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-20  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-20  8:36 [PATCH 00/11] netfs: Further miscellaneous fixes David Howells
2026-04-20  8:36 ` [PATCH 01/11] netfs: Fix early put of sink folio in netfs_read_gaps() David Howells
2026-04-20  8:36 ` [PATCH 02/11] netfs: Fix leak of request in netfs_write_begin() error handling David Howells
2026-04-20  8:36 ` David Howells [this message]
2026-04-20  8:36 ` [PATCH 04/11] netfs: Fix potential uninitialised var in netfs_extract_user_iter() David Howells
2026-04-20  8:36 ` [PATCH 05/11] netfs: Fix partial invalidation of streaming-write folio David Howells
2026-04-20  8:36 ` [PATCH 06/11] netfs: Fix the trace displayed for the total overwrite of a streamed write David Howells
2026-04-20  8:36 ` [PATCH 07/11] netfs: Fix folio->private handling in netfs_perform_write() David Howells
2026-04-20  8:36 ` [PATCH 08/11] netfs: Fix group handling in netfs_read_gaps() David Howells
2026-04-20  8:37 ` [PATCH 09/11] netfs: Fix potential for tearing in ->remote_i_size and ->zero_point David Howells
2026-04-20  8:37 ` [PATCH 10/11] netfs: Fix comment about write-streaming avoidance David Howells
2026-04-20  8:37 ` [PATCH 11/11] netfs: Fix netfs_read_folio() to wait on writeback David Howells
2026-04-21 11:56 ` [PATCH 00/11] netfs: Further miscellaneous fixes Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260420083705.1009074-4-dhowells@redhat.com \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=christian@brauner.io \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pc@manguebit.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox