From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org>,
netfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 11/19] netfs: Fix potential UAF in netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages()
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2026 13:54:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260425125426.3855807-12-dhowells@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260425125426.3855807-1-dhowells@redhat.com>
netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages(rreq) accesses the index of the folios it
is wanting to unlock and compares that to rreq->no_unlock_folio so that it
doesn't unlock a folio being read for netfs_perform_write() or
netfs_write_begin().
However, given that netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages() is called _after_
NETFS_RREQ_IN_PROGRESS is cleared, the one folio that it's not allowed to
dereference is the one specified by ->no_unlock_folio as ownership
immediately reverts to the caller.
Fix this by storing the folio pointer instead and using that rather than
the index. Also fix netfs_unlock_read_folio() where the same applies.
Fixes: ee4cdf7ba857 ("netfs: Speed up buffered reading")
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260414082004.3756080-1-dhowells%40redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org>
cc: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
---
fs/netfs/buffered_read.c | 4 ++--
fs/netfs/read_collect.c | 2 +-
fs/netfs/read_retry.c | 2 +-
include/linux/netfs.h | 2 +-
4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c b/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
index 0ba224d23f0f..f94c7f3780e0 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
@@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ int netfs_write_begin(struct netfs_inode *ctx,
ret = PTR_ERR(rreq);
goto error;
}
- rreq->no_unlock_folio = folio->index;
+ rreq->no_unlock_folio = folio;
__set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_NO_UNLOCK_FOLIO, &rreq->flags);
ret = netfs_begin_cache_read(rreq, ctx);
@@ -738,7 +738,7 @@ int netfs_prefetch_for_write(struct file *file, struct folio *folio,
goto error;
}
- rreq->no_unlock_folio = folio->index;
+ rreq->no_unlock_folio = folio;
__set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_NO_UNLOCK_FOLIO, &rreq->flags);
ret = netfs_begin_cache_read(rreq, ctx);
if (ret == -ENOMEM || ret == -EINTR || ret == -ERESTARTSYS)
diff --git a/fs/netfs/read_collect.c b/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
index e5f6665b3341..eae067e3eaa5 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static void netfs_unlock_read_folio(struct netfs_io_request *rreq,
}
just_unlock:
- if (folio->index == rreq->no_unlock_folio &&
+ if (folio == rreq->no_unlock_folio &&
test_bit(NETFS_RREQ_NO_UNLOCK_FOLIO, &rreq->flags)) {
_debug("no unlock");
} else {
diff --git a/fs/netfs/read_retry.c b/fs/netfs/read_retry.c
index 68fc869513ef..999177426141 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/read_retry.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/read_retry.c
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ void netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages(struct netfs_io_request *rreq)
struct folio *folio = folioq_folio(p, slot);
if (folio && !folioq_is_marked2(p, slot)) {
- if (folio->index == rreq->no_unlock_folio &&
+ if (folio == rreq->no_unlock_folio &&
test_bit(NETFS_RREQ_NO_UNLOCK_FOLIO,
&rreq->flags)) {
_debug("no unlock");
diff --git a/include/linux/netfs.h b/include/linux/netfs.h
index ba17ac5bf356..62a528f90666 100644
--- a/include/linux/netfs.h
+++ b/include/linux/netfs.h
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ struct netfs_io_request {
unsigned long long collected_to; /* Point we've collected to */
unsigned long long cleaned_to; /* Position we've cleaned folios to */
unsigned long long abandon_to; /* Position to abandon folios to */
- pgoff_t no_unlock_folio; /* Don't unlock this folio after read */
+ const struct folio *no_unlock_folio; /* Don't unlock this folio after read */
unsigned int direct_bv_count; /* Number of elements in direct_bv[] */
unsigned int debug_id;
unsigned int rsize; /* Maximum read size (0 for none) */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-25 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-25 12:54 [PATCH v3 00/19] netfs: Miscellaneous fixes David Howells
2026-04-25 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 01/19] netfs: fix VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO() issue in netfs_write_begin() call David Howells
2026-04-25 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 02/19] netfs: fix error handling in netfs_extract_user_iter() David Howells
2026-04-25 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 03/19] netfs: Fix netfs_invalidate_folio() to clear dirty bit if all changes gone David Howells
2026-04-25 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 04/19] netfs: Defer the emission of trace_netfs_folio() David Howells
2026-04-25 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 05/19] netfs: Fix streaming write being overwritten David Howells
2026-04-25 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 06/19] netfs: Fix read-gaps to remove netfs_folio from filled folio David Howells
2026-04-25 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 07/19] netfs: Fix zeropoint update where i_size > remote_i_size David Howells
2026-04-25 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 08/19] netfs: Fix write streaming disablement if fd open O_RDWR David Howells
2026-04-25 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 09/19] netfs: Fix early put of sink folio in netfs_read_gaps() David Howells
2026-04-25 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 10/19] netfs: Fix leak of request in netfs_write_begin() error handling David Howells
2026-04-25 12:54 ` David Howells [this message]
2026-04-25 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 12/19] netfs: Fix potential uninitialised var in netfs_extract_user_iter() David Howells
2026-04-25 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 13/19] netfs: Fix partial invalidation of streaming-write folio David Howells
2026-04-25 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 14/19] netfs: Fix folio->private handling in netfs_perform_write() David Howells
2026-04-25 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 15/19] netfs: Fix potential for tearing in ->remote_i_size and ->zero_point David Howells
2026-04-25 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 16/19] netfs: Fix netfs_read_folio() to wait on writeback David Howells
2026-04-25 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 17/19] netfs: Fix missing barriers when accessing stream->subrequests locklessly David Howells
2026-04-25 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 18/19] afs: Fix afs_get_link() to take validate_lock around afs_read_single() David Howells
2026-04-25 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 19/19] afs: Fix RCU handling of symlinks in RCU pathwalk David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260425125426.3855807-12-dhowells@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pc@manguebit.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox