From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1364C3A9632; Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777451308; cv=none; b=g8FSdAenjM285B8UtwWSO1LmTqZ3+cCylSMN7tgpn/wmGB4UPkofIulF8wk819nB1UlnyaQM31xPxCspspZZAvgU63bHn57ujiDmnZIJ2k3flmCs3TllMfdmeBNDSonf/nHCCexgdp7y9Bh09n1AK2w05xOW9zoQjAFP55IsKcw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777451308; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cOxa4CgWhjet1z2EeEEdLVqhmu6YFrkVnG4ZICWRr0M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=q9DgyMqLHIxvs015OcgE9oOCj9goh5TG77xtfA3VHluzbu/jU3E2uqHR53bwxFNgPOg6YSQx/u1N2e5VUxNoqv+AM88bL+bmjBoReFq16M+tOC38gIdHLrtW3oIKwnBUoelUfAhAm/cAHpZXkJEjb/kvczeEENhaRF9rkokWYVI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=NYvQ95pO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="NYvQ95pO" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1777451307; x=1808987307; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=cOxa4CgWhjet1z2EeEEdLVqhmu6YFrkVnG4ZICWRr0M=; b=NYvQ95pObiBus+noSgHKDeUYfD2bb416h8F8hq/48yJR3JCgKTZDmAL0 rsyyZPFF115+dym+5Q8+x+y7szQlkESJ1YI3yZnk3pl1QeA0Acoy2Y4z9 IgLpWxygPqoviB4wpwa/BntlxGNkFVy5UELZhKUytiDus3TOdHtyecyF0 DCkQ841jm0dGLf/dPGP8HocqYwc+/XsJEnN9p3pSzMmTdo54cb3Jdfk9g bXD0v4U4t4EnSMbzl/motZhQHh/mgP/GlSBikSgZXeSTK05yL8rAPwvZq PQtrh5PjzGEwXf6LhXxbW8T01p8p5gfWdiLHzeA/t7Zsz5mKMns5ogq2t Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: k6Cu91PgRkeNZiUhAiQulQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: OGAf1HXMRIaH2VNC4Tn2+g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11770"; a="65905223" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,205,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="65905223" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by fmvoesa110.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Apr 2026 01:28:26 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 8mkmh+WgT9iotp82+uPsdQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: XnmKZAYmTgyF33Wn7Sdevg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,205,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="227692057" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO aa799cca880d) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa009.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Apr 2026 01:28:24 -0700 Received: from kbuild by aa799cca880d with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wI0HM-00000000Ap2-3WbZ; Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:28:20 +0000 Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:27:32 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Christian Brauner , Thomas Graf , Herbert Xu , Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka , Lorenzo Stoakes , David Hildenbrand , Suren Baghdasaryan , Michal Hocko Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Linux Memory Management List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, syzbot+5af806780f38a5fe691f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, Christian Brauner Subject: Re: [PATCH] rhashtable: give each instance its own lockdep class Message-ID: <202604291646.noNYgx5i-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260427-work-rhashtable-lockdep-v1-1-f69e8bd91cb2@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260427-work-rhashtable-lockdep-v1-1-f69e8bd91cb2@kernel.org> Hi Christian, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on 6596a02b207886e9e00bb0161c7fd59fea53c081] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-Brauner/rhashtable-give-each-instance-its-own-lockdep-class/20260428-182539 base: 6596a02b207886e9e00bb0161c7fd59fea53c081 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260427-work-rhashtable-lockdep-v1-1-f69e8bd91cb2%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCH] rhashtable: give each instance its own lockdep class config: x86_64-rhel-9.4 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260429/202604291646.noNYgx5i-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260429/202604291646.noNYgx5i-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202604291646.noNYgx5i-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> Warning: lib/rhashtable.c:1030 function parameter 'key' not described in '__rhashtable_init' >> Warning: lib/rhashtable.c:1030 expecting prototype for rhashtable_init(). Prototype was for __rhashtable_init() instead >> Warning: lib/rhashtable.c:1104 function parameter 'key' not described in '__rhltable_init' >> Warning: lib/rhashtable.c:1104 expecting prototype for rhltable_init(). Prototype was for __rhltable_init() instead -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki