From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
fsverity@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: overlayfs: verity validation broken since f77f281b6118
Date: Fri, 1 May 2026 11:07:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260501180725.GB2260@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf0ba588-002b-4860-848e-e806b193840a@app.fastmail.com>
[+Cc fsverity@lists.linux.dev]
On Fri, May 01, 2026 at 01:14:54PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> Hi Christoph & Eric,
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=f77f281b6118 broke composefs's usage of overlayfs verity=require, this was reported originally in https://github.com/bootc-dev/bootc/issues/2174
>
> There's some output from an agent run I had in the <details> there, but here's an xfstests patch that passes on without that commit and fails with it.
>
> From 14231122bfd1e41337e4fb847acbbe038457c32a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>
> Date: Fri, 1 May 2026 09:45:58 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] overlay/118: test fsverity lazy load through metacopy overlay
>
> Reproduces the regression reported at:
> https://github.com/bootc-dev/bootc/issues/2174
>
> A recent change in how fsverity state was cached in memory
> I think caused inodes not in cache to appear to have
> missing verity=require for overlayfs.
>
> This test catches that.
>
> Generated-by: OpenCode (Claude Sonnet 4.5)
> Signed-off-by: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>
Sorry about that. I guess it's because the semantics of
fsverity_active() changed to be basically the same as IS_VERITY(), and
that broke ovl_ensure_verity_loaded() which does
'!fsverity_active(inode) && IS_VERITY(inode)'. I guess now it should
do: IS_VERITY(inode) && fsverity_get_info(inode) == NULL.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-01 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-01 17:14 overlayfs: verity validation broken since f77f281b6118 Colin Walters
2026-05-01 18:07 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2026-05-05 18:07 ` Andrey Albershteyn
2026-05-05 20:19 ` Colin Walters
2026-05-02 9:23 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-05-05 16:51 ` Colin Walters
2026-05-05 17:18 ` Eric Biggers
2026-05-05 18:44 ` Colin Walters
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260501180725.GB2260@sol \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=fsverity@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=walters@verbum.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox