From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 17/25] reducing rcu_read_lock() scopes in dput and friends, step 6
Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 06:54:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260505055412.1261144-18-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260505055412.1261144-1-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
In the "got a victim" case in shrink_dcache_tree() we can
pull the rcu_read_unlock() call up to right after grabbing
->d_lock.
Document the resulting rcu_read_lock() scope - it spans from
unbalanced rcu_read_lock() in select_collect2() to unbalanced
rcu_read_unlock() in shrink_dcache_tree(), bridging two
->d_lock scopes into single RCU read-side critical area.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
fs/dcache.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index 5872f369ddaf..6822e8bfc6af 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -1619,6 +1619,15 @@ static enum d_walk_ret select_collect2(void *_data, struct dentry *dentry)
if (dentry->d_lockref.count <= 0) {
if (!__move_to_shrink_list(dentry, &data->dispose)) {
+ /*
+ * We need an enter RCU read-side critical area that
+ * would extend past the return from d_walk() and
+ * we are in the scope of ->d_lock that will terminate
+ * before that, so we use rcu_read_lock() to bridge
+ * over to the scope of ->d_lock in d_walk() caller.
+ * The scope of rcu_read_lock() spans from here to
+ * paired rcu_read_unlock() in shrink_dcache_tree().
+ */
rcu_read_lock();
data->victim = dentry;
return D_WALK_QUIT;
@@ -1663,8 +1672,20 @@ static void shrink_dcache_tree(struct dentry *parent, bool for_umount)
d_walk(parent, &data, select_collect2);
if (data.victim) {
struct dentry *v = data.victim;
-
+ /*
+ * select_collect2() has picked a dentry that was
+ * either dying or on a shrink list and arranged
+ * for it to be returned to us. We are still in
+ * the RCU read-side critical area started there
+ * (rcu_read_lock() scope opened in select_collect2()),
+ * so dentry couldn't have been freed yet, but its
+ * state might've changed since we dropped ->d_lock
+ * on the way out. Switch over to ->d_lock scope
+ * and recheck the dentry state.
+ */
spin_lock(&v->d_lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
if (v->d_lockref.count < 0 &&
!(v->d_flags & DCACHE_DENTRY_KILLED)) {
struct completion_list wait;
@@ -1672,13 +1693,11 @@ static void shrink_dcache_tree(struct dentry *parent, bool for_umount)
// it becomes invisible to d_walk().
d_add_waiter(v, &wait);
spin_unlock(&v->d_lock);
- rcu_read_unlock();
if (!list_empty(&data.dispose))
shrink_dentry_list(&data.dispose);
wait_for_completion(&wait.completion);
continue;
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
shrink_kill(v);
}
if (!list_empty(&data.dispose))
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-05 5:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-05 5:53 [RFC PATCH 00/25] assorted dcache cleanups and fixes Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:53 ` [RFC PATCH 01/25] VFS: use wait_var_event for waiting in d_alloc_parallel() Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:53 ` [RFC PATCH 02/25] alloc_path_pseudo(): make sure we don't end up with NORCU dentries for directories Al Viro
2026-05-05 8:21 ` NeilBrown
2026-05-05 17:48 ` Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:53 ` [RFC PATCH 03/25] fix a race between d_find_any_alias() and final dput() of NORCU dentries Al Viro
2026-05-05 17:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-05-05 20:29 ` Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:53 ` [RFC PATCH 04/25] find_acceptable_alias(): skip NORCU aliases with zero refcount Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:53 ` [RFC PATCH 05/25] select_collect(): ignore dentries on shrink lists if they have positive refcounts Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:53 ` [RFC PATCH 06/25] make to_shrink_list() return whether it has moved dentry to list Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:53 ` [RFC PATCH 07/25] kill d_dispose_if_unused() Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:53 ` [RFC PATCH 08/25] d_prune_aliases(): make sure to skip NORCU aliases Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:53 ` [RFC PATCH 09/25] shrink_dentry_list(): start with removing from shrink list Al Viro
2026-05-07 20:39 ` Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:53 ` [RFC PATCH 10/25] fold lock_for_kill() into shrink_kill() Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:53 ` [RFC PATCH 11/25] fold lock_for_kill() and __dentry_kill() into common helper Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:53 ` [RFC PATCH 12/25] reducing rcu_read_lock() scopes in dput and friends, step 1 Al Viro
2026-05-05 8:55 ` NeilBrown
2026-05-05 14:22 ` Al Viro
2026-05-05 21:58 ` NeilBrown
2026-05-05 16:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-05-05 22:42 ` Al Viro
2026-05-07 7:35 ` Al Viro
2026-05-07 15:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 13/25] reducing rcu_read_lock() scopes in dput and friends, step 2 Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 14/25] reducing rcu_read_lock() scopes in dput and friends, step 3 Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 15/25] reducing rcu_read_lock() scopes in dput and friends, step 4 Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 16/25] reducing rcu_read_lock() scopes in dput and friends, step 5 Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:54 ` Al Viro [this message]
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 18/25] adjust calling conventions of lock_for_kill(), fold __dentry_kill() into dentry_kill() Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 19/25] document dentry_kill() Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 20/25] d_walk(): shrink rcu_read_lock() scope Al Viro
2026-05-05 17:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-05-05 20:05 ` Al Viro
2026-05-05 21:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-05-05 22:50 ` Al Viro
2026-05-06 3:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-05-07 22:39 ` NeilBrown
2026-05-07 23:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-05-08 14:47 ` Al Viro
2026-05-08 22:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-05-08 23:03 ` Al Viro
2026-05-08 3:01 ` Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 21/25] shrinking rcu_read_lock() scope in d_alloc_parallel() Al Viro
2026-05-07 21:52 ` Jori Koolstra
2026-05-08 3:12 ` Al Viro
2026-05-08 9:28 ` Jori Koolstra
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 22/25] shrink_dentry_tree(): unify the calls of shrink_dentry_list() Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 23/25] wind ->s_roots via ->d_sib instead of ->d_hash Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 24/25] nfs: get rid of fake root dentries Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 25/25] make cursors NORCU Al Viro
2026-05-05 17:09 ` [RFC PATCH 00/25] assorted dcache cleanups and fixes Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260505055412.1261144-18-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox