From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f54.google.com (mail-wm1-f54.google.com [209.85.128.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA7A23F1676 for ; Tue, 19 May 2026 09:21:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.54 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779182515; cv=none; b=A0cjO0Igl6NvPO3UdoyhSkhU0LSqe3QiYbWOFSWL9vgBjxQ9K1UjXFXQ1ZDIYYYQ//hkNezd8ok1X2ZRwJBok4437JtuxHWCf/BLm3ZC8bJwXGYnNIJW1TxLg7pqlCRdcOeeFtHrm1SUvpFtRrb5DclM0PvP33uPrwPnl2JSoMI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779182515; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wSz4n6ZHAULGvzhTDNuqX4TTX95Vfl31WZE4J82fus8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JmT8DeipMUczlXGB8Ft60sJ0nO/ecgySLTb94ZS/z8d3OzFxoewA2E/Mvv/uuBU2UAE8OHU3kbVAbJpDxUVWKdsWSDIVoJuId2Kq+gs0gP/oAgQX9XJ7KD56JroynwbEqg9A5wOGOOjrJuDsArnowH9EsSNrDdR5TkQqHmPmngk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=TXpWbKTo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.54 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="TXpWbKTo" Received: by mail-wm1-f54.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-48d146705b4so35847505e9.3 for ; Tue, 19 May 2026 02:21:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1779182511; x=1779787311; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=QoHvwM4p61ukSgPZjfDBcRJdrzaBcrrvLVu02xCIKiI=; b=TXpWbKTojEsG/x9DQwsk/0H+XskySEyrX0rBufagIM5coaGZbN4GMMyWHMx4wOTKnO 6nM1l2EQGpvGlehe2RC3T4ZBB1WXsj5Rf1E3MrufZxH1mcHQuV2DAjr18FBVYOUqYjgc +6y1OM/nUF90Z8+DA5+FZSGWcJgji8lL/IivBQGcVB2VBugHWaXZs3DvHHfOHbKVJOLc vV+FsJBSqOSx/H3aGa+CQ0UCZvTUjL0to9I1RZpRrMVSq0L1BHC0/CMKYJEwpHBcmjhf OXkr4+d8/+ve/13fJL8u6Pr2sBaon2BIZEsoQmRkPYR4psV5RmARGkuLDY7jOuB2fCFu Dd5Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1779182511; x=1779787311; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=QoHvwM4p61ukSgPZjfDBcRJdrzaBcrrvLVu02xCIKiI=; b=qqDRXZG3r6U/OsnRczZbd6+lRtVyWqTS2opG2ecrJhY+LWHnvaWoVoapoh9qJqkxrp OMxUs26Y92nFMq/mi8f+i51yzcu5vg00CvEp1USWus5goNf64nZiN/a5NFchv4NYXtjG LqVWhsCKL9xndiTZuzKMXe4YjGULX/rI+rWNCDvQyDZLNYGfsP7fg7Ngvbd7WbVtMLcY Cujp8+RTHjMVpNAF8kBJvkvOqLBaIM+2sJt7n0Fg7fmXfRU+6INct/hxoRlCfcX+MFov 2kPD+M3eAnMl/ax2mtyjXT11Q777KDQ2tGGXmMCYQKeGmtiI++IKbh9aHkDksYtBBaFm mc8Q== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ/svU213GmBgAjElL1e9HL7uUGSihMgKhGdbIRwx2QYTerD12r5xD5TIaIZgCBcRiWzDurjkJqIeBGOybKX@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwKH3KQuTnwZFSH1D5eEDzoMY6abAdAloy2qUYMMdMhEXP5fN/S wpvrjTq4dctKIu8ekcoX2e31ebYwcZu9STbzG/i6qYMkE1UzMgHa1UIK X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OHOFAocMqEiZLHUwsqylKLPB7nGeurZ0ZeOfgwiSGiGXYAKCe3EFrhpwh2Bnae 5mrjQDPfVUg0M+faPNJbgjU2j+ZSEB9B1+9JnWhRX+J5MLVENAepI+kCzW7N15x1HiS8q02Hc9h J2AAITjGOv1ZysG7lqMB52n+2TxPsCVOG8iixxZZubH7HcB+IxDUseA1pRVfcxgIq9cPdFmCMu2 l2KWbUUfznr6OFOTH3LuRs6lC5Mt8qGhDl9qPGDiLkTUhV0fsFYNTqULDkMZ/KSs/ep5EkKxKQI RS4cgX6h96F5srwDBLJBcxtMvuGOCiOpIx8wBxF3i6s8Gw5kaZOwicCJHFQd1BB53bdHOyV9FKs aYg828QaTpGyJVGEpN0avXei7PaLIWL99p35ElKtrmdsqL85EPZpT60AP8eOts+uB1k0583zPMw LO/aLCfIZ/kOLFIsLIbfO2NLeG0BcpVoBLCxOVYY4ILD3sX1+DeELypdft6BHcWOLyL13Ph3Jle 1A= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4f13:b0:485:30d4:6b9e with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-48fe6328bb7mr321111245e9.21.1779182510799; Tue, 19 May 2026 02:21:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pumpkin (82-69-66-36.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.69.66.36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-48feab2a23dsm102576065e9.5.2026.05.19.02.21.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 19 May 2026 02:21:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 10:21:48 +0100 From: David Laight To: Pavel Begunkov Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Keith Busch , Sagi Grimberg , Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner , Andrew Morton , Sumit Semwal , Christian =?UTF-8?B?S8O2bmln?= , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, Nitesh Shetty , Kanchan Joshi , Anuj Gupta , Tushar Gohad , William Power , Phil Cayton , Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] block: introduce dma map backed bio type Message-ID: <20260519102148.21d42afc@pumpkin> In-Reply-To: <24833f76-2289-4859-86d1-9215b11a1258@gmail.com> References: <646ecd6fde8d9e146cb051efb514deb27ce3883e.1777475843.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> <20260513081929.GD5477@lst.de> <24833f76-2289-4859-86d1-9215b11a1258@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 18 May 2026 11:29:54 +0100 Pavel Begunkov wrote: > On 5/13/26 09:19, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >> + if (!bio_flagged(bio_src, BIO_DMABUF_MAP)) { > >> + bio->bi_io_vec = bio_src->bi_io_vec; > >> + } else { > >> + bio->dmabuf_map = bio_src->dmabuf_map; > >> + bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_DMABUF_MAP); > >> + } > > > > This is backwards, please avoid pointless negations: > > I can flip it, but compilers tend to prefer the true branch. E.g. this > > if (cond) A; else B; > C; > > can get compiled into: > > jmpcc cond B > A: ... > C: > return; > B: ... > jmp C; I'm pretty sure gcc completely ignores the order. Some very old compilers didn't - to the extreme of generating a short conditional branch around a long unconditional branch to get past a large 'true' code block. likely() and unlikely() can change things, they are definitely useful comments to a human (or Human) reader. I'm not sure you can rely on the branch predictor to do anything sensible outside of a loop. -- David