From: AnonymeMeow <anonymemeow@gmail.com>
To: jack@suse.cz
Cc: amir73il@gmail.com, brauner@kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
AnonymeMeow <anonymemeow@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] fanotify: allow reporting pidfds for reaped tasks
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 08:15:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260603001516.26234-3-anonymemeow@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260603001516.26234-1-anonymemeow@gmail.com>
Fanotify used to refuse to report pidfds for reaped tasks by applying a
pid_has_task() check before calling pidfd_prepare(). This prevented
userspace from obtaining information about the task.
Register the event pid with pidfs when creating the fanotify event if
pidfd reporting was requested, so pidfd_prepare() can later create a
pidfd for the reaped task.
Signed-off-by: AnonymeMeow <anonymemeow@gmail.com>
---
To avoid having to destroy the allocated event on failure paths after
pidfs_register_pid(), I moved the pid lookup before allocating the
fanotify event. And I keep the pid as a non-refcounted pointer until
the event is ready to take ownership of it. This keeps all failure
paths from having to call put_pid(). Not sure whether this is the
preferred pattern here.
---
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 16 ++++++++++------
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 18 +++++-------------
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
index 38290b9c07f7..f4e28e7d3d8a 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
#include <linux/statfs.h>
#include <linux/stringhash.h>
+#include <linux/pidfs.h>
#include "fanotify.h"
@@ -828,6 +829,14 @@ static struct fanotify_event *fanotify_alloc_event(
}
}
+ if (FAN_GROUP_FLAG(group, FAN_REPORT_TID))
+ pid = task_pid(current);
+ else
+ pid = task_tgid(current);
+
+ if (FAN_GROUP_FLAG(group, FAN_REPORT_PIDFD) && pidfs_register_pid(pid))
+ return NULL;
+
/*
* For queues with unlimited length lost events are not expected and
* can possibly have security implications. Avoid losing events when
@@ -863,15 +872,10 @@ static struct fanotify_event *fanotify_alloc_event(
if (!event)
goto out;
- if (FAN_GROUP_FLAG(group, FAN_REPORT_TID))
- pid = get_pid(task_pid(current));
- else
- pid = get_pid(task_tgid(current));
-
/* Mix event info, FAN_ONDIR flag and pid into event merge key */
hash ^= hash_long((unsigned long)pid | ondir, FANOTIFY_EVENT_HASH_BITS);
fanotify_init_event(event, hash, mask);
- event->pid = pid;
+ event->pid = get_pid(pid);
out:
set_active_memcg(old_memcg);
diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
index ebdd48942029..b604e3da58ad 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
@@ -904,20 +904,12 @@ static ssize_t copy_event_to_user(struct fsnotify_group *group,
metadata.fd = fd >= 0 ? fd : FAN_NOFD;
if (pidfd_mode) {
- unsigned int tid_mode = FAN_GROUP_FLAG(group, FAN_REPORT_TID);
- enum pid_type pidtype = tid_mode ? PIDTYPE_PID : PIDTYPE_TGID;
- unsigned int pidfd_flags = tid_mode ? PIDFD_THREAD : 0;
+ unsigned int pidfd_flags = PIDFD_STALE;
- /*
- * The pid_has_task() check for an event->pid is performed
- * preemptively in an attempt to catch out cases where the event
- * listener reads events after the event generating task has
- * already terminated. Depending on flag FAN_REPORT_FD_ERROR,
- * report either -ESRCH or FAN_NOPIDFD to the event listener in
- * those cases with all other pidfd creation errors reported as
- * the error code itself or as FAN_EPIDFD.
- */
- if (metadata.pid && pid_has_task(event->pid, pidtype))
+ if (FAN_GROUP_FLAG(group, FAN_REPORT_TID))
+ pidfd_flags |= PIDFD_THREAD;
+
+ if (metadata.pid)
pidfd = pidfd_prepare(event->pid, pidfd_flags, &pidfd_file);
if (!FAN_GROUP_FLAG(group, FAN_REPORT_FD_ERROR) && pidfd < 0)
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-03 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-03 0:15 [PATCH v4 0/2] fanotify: lift pidfd reporting restrictions AnonymeMeow
2026-06-03 0:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] fanotify: report thread pidfds for FAN_REPORT_TID AnonymeMeow
2026-06-03 9:55 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-06-03 0:15 ` AnonymeMeow [this message]
2026-06-03 3:11 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] fanotify: allow reporting pidfds for reaped tasks AnonymeMeow
2026-06-03 10:00 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-06-03 10:28 ` Christian Brauner
2026-06-03 10:58 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-06-03 11:25 ` Christian Brauner
2026-06-03 12:02 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-06-04 20:29 ` AnonymeMeow
2026-06-05 7:54 ` Christian Brauner
2026-06-05 8:15 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-06-05 8:19 ` Christian Brauner
2026-06-05 8:28 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-06-06 23:45 ` AnonymeMeow
2026-06-10 7:42 ` Christian Brauner
2026-06-04 19:46 ` [DRAFT][PATCH] fanotify: lift pidfd reporting restrictions AnonymeMeow
2026-06-05 8:23 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-06-05 10:04 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260603001516.26234-3-anonymemeow@gmail.com \
--to=anonymemeow@gmail.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox