From: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Wei Yang <albinwyang@tencent.com>,
Zijie Wang <wangzijie1@honor.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] proc: only bump parent nlink when registering directories
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2026 21:10:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260613211005.921692-1-kwilczynski@kernel.org> (raw)
proc_register() increments the parent directory's link count for every
entry it registers, while remove_proc_entry() and remove_proc_subtree()
decrement it only when the removed entry is a directory. Regular files
thus inflate the parent's count while they exist, and leak one link
permanently on every create and remove cycle.
For example, /proc/bus/pci/00 with twenty-two device files and no
subdirectories reports nlink 24 instead of 2, and SR-IOV VF enable
and disable cycles, each creating and removing the VF config space
entries under /proc/bus/pci/<bus>, inflate the link count of that
directory without bound.
Before commit e06689bf5701 ("proc: change ->nlink under
proc_subdir_lock"), the increment lived in proc_mkdir_data() and
proc_create_mount_point(), and was therefore applied only to
directories. Moving it into proc_register() to bring it under
proc_subdir_lock dropped the S_ISDIR check.
Thus, move the nlink accounting into pde_subdir_insert() and
pde_erase(), only updating it for directories in both, so the link
count is always changed together with the directory entry itself.
Fixes: e06689bf5701 ("proc: change ->nlink under proc_subdir_lock")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.5+
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kwilczynski@kernel.org>
---
Changes in v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20260612153031.536525-1-kwilczynski@kernel.org/
- Moved the nlink accounting into pde_subdir_insert() and
pde_erase() instead of adding a check in proc_register(), as
suggested by Alexey Dobriyan.
fs/proc/generic.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/generic.c b/fs/proc/generic.c
index 8bb81e58c9d8..32b6b0f97967 100644
--- a/fs/proc/generic.c
+++ b/fs/proc/generic.c
@@ -112,6 +112,8 @@ static bool pde_subdir_insert(struct proc_dir_entry *dir,
/* Add new node and rebalance tree. */
rb_link_node(&de->subdir_node, parent, new);
rb_insert_color(&de->subdir_node, root);
+ if (S_ISDIR(de->mode))
+ dir->nlink++;
return true;
}
@@ -404,7 +406,6 @@ struct proc_dir_entry *proc_register(struct proc_dir_entry *dir,
write_unlock(&proc_subdir_lock);
goto out_free_inum;
}
- dir->nlink++;
write_unlock(&proc_subdir_lock);
return dp;
@@ -702,6 +703,8 @@ static void pde_erase(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct proc_dir_entry *parent)
{
rb_erase(&pde->subdir_node, &parent->subdir);
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&pde->subdir_node);
+ if (S_ISDIR(pde->mode))
+ parent->nlink--;
}
/*
@@ -727,8 +730,6 @@ void remove_proc_entry(const char *name, struct proc_dir_entry *parent)
de = NULL;
} else {
pde_erase(de, parent);
- if (S_ISDIR(de->mode))
- parent->nlink--;
}
}
write_unlock(&proc_subdir_lock);
@@ -787,8 +788,6 @@ int remove_proc_subtree(const char *name, struct proc_dir_entry *parent)
continue;
}
next = de->parent;
- if (S_ISDIR(de->mode))
- next->nlink--;
write_unlock(&proc_subdir_lock);
proc_entry_rundown(de);
--
2.54.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-13 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-13 21:10 Krzysztof Wilczyński [this message]
2026-06-17 13:21 ` [PATCH v2] proc: only bump parent nlink when registering directories Christian Brauner
2026-06-29 5:42 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2026-06-29 9:17 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260613211005.921692-1-kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--to=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=albinwyang@tencent.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangzijie1@honor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox