From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, axboe@kernel.dk, brauner@kernel.org,
djwong@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] block: validate user space vectors during extraction
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 15:43:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260618134346.GA2752@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ajPv7yOoYsR5O6kf@kbusch-mbp>
On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 07:17:35AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > if (iov_iter_is_bvec(iter)) {
> > > bio_iov_bvec_set(bio, iter);
> > > +
> > > + if (mp_bvec_iter_offset(bio->bi_io_vec, bio->bi_iter) &
> > > + vec_align_mask)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> >
> > Can you add a comment here? Especially as the bvec iter doesn't actually
> > require all individual bvecs to be aligned and I'm not entirely sure this
> > handles all case - writing down the rules might help a bit with that.
>
> The rationale is that the only iter_bvec users come from io_uring
> registered buffers, which are virtually contiguous.
There's plenty of iov_iter_bdev users, and even without poking deep I
know that two directly passed on bvecs from block-layer generated bios to
the underlying file system's direct I/O code: loop and zloop.
So we need rules on what can be passed, and preferably some way to
enforce that at least for debug builds.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-18 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-17 23:32 [PATCH 0/1] direct-io: validate user space vectors during extraction Keith Busch
2026-06-17 23:32 ` [PATCH 1/1] block: " Keith Busch
2026-06-18 10:22 ` kernel test robot
2026-06-18 10:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-18 13:17 ` Keith Busch
2026-06-18 13:43 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-06-18 13:51 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260618134346.GA2752@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox