Linux filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Kelu Ye <yekelu1@huawei.com>, Yifan Zhao <zhaoyifan28@huawei.com>,
	Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: submit read bio after each extent
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 15:52:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623135258.GA8720@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJnrk1ad7Wxr9CB4P1=VZPUS_BRmHTTmRVXVgRjM628iFCZh0w@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 02:51:36PM -0700, Joanne Koong wrote:
> Does it make sense to move this line to the bio submit_read callback
> instead of unconditionally clearing it here? If we clear it here, I
> think this makes read_ctx only able to hold per-mapping state instead
> of also being able to hold persistent state across mappings. fuse
> currently uses read_ctx to hold per-request state (though this patch
> wouldn't break anything since fuse only ever returns one mapping
> covering the whole request).

I've done that for v2, also we also need a new argument to
->submit_read for that to be useful.


      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-23 13:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-19  5:00 don't build bios/contexts over multiple iomaps Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-19  5:00 ` [PATCH] iomap: submit read bio after each extent Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-19  8:15   ` Gao Xiang
2026-06-19 10:15   ` Christian Brauner
2026-06-22  5:51     ` Gao Xiang
2026-06-22 21:51   ` Joanne Koong
2026-06-23 13:52     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260623135258.GA8720@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=yekelu1@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhaoyifan28@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox