From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Filip Blagojevic <filip.blagojevic@wdc.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: update BDI {io,ra}_pages values based on the RT device limits
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 11:11:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720091128.GB24062@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <al3j0GaQaeYj0Ih8@nidhogg.toxiclabs.cc>
On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 11:02:15AM +0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 04:21:06PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > When using XFS with a main device on an SSD that stores metadata and a RT
> > device to store data on a HDD, we fail to take the I/O sizes for the RT
> > device into accounting, leading to up to 5% slower read performance when
> > using an SSD for metadata vs storing data and metadata on the HDD.
> >
> > Fix this up by taking the RT settings into account. Note that this
> > updates the BDI owned by the main device, and leaves those settings in
> > place even when the file system is unmounted. This is a bit unexpected
> > but not different from manual tuning through sysfs (although that is only
> > possible for the ra_pages value).
>
> Sorry a 'very late reply', but...
> On a second thought, wouldn't be wise to cache the original value in
> memory and restore it during unmount/filesystem shutdown?
>
> I could send a patch to complement this one if you guys agree, otherwise
> just ignore me.
As mentioned this does seem like a valid option, there's tradeoff
both ways. Although we'd also want a flag to avoid restoring them
if they were changed while mounted so it would get a bit more
complicated. Happy to respin it for that if there is a general
preference.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-23 14:21 update BDI {io,ra}_pages values based on the RT device limits Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-23 14:21 ` [PATCH] xfs: " Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-02 22:25 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-07-20 9:02 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-07-20 9:11 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-07-20 9:38 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-06-24 10:40 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-06-24 15:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-24 12:26 ` Jan Kara
2026-06-24 13:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-25 11:12 ` Jan Kara
2026-06-25 13:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-29 12:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-07-20 14:08 update BDI {io,ra}_pages values based on the RT device limits v2 Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-20 14:08 ` [PATCH] xfs: update BDI {io,ra}_pages values based on the RT device limits Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260720091128.GB24062@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=filip.blagojevic@wdc.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox