From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
Farid Zakaria <farid.m.zakaria@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, jannh@google.com, mail@johnericson.me,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
"Christian Brauner (Amutable)" <brauner@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] binfmt_misc: don't leak the user namespace when the mount fails
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 15:48:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260728-work-binfmt_misc-usernsleak-v1-1-dbd8d5e626e7@kernel.org> (raw)
bm_get_tree() takes a reference to the user namespace and hands it to
get_tree_keyed() as the sget key. sget_fc() moves that reference into
sb->s_fs_info and clears fc->s_fs_info, so from that point on the
superblock owns it and bm_free() doesn't see it anymore.
The superblock drops it in ->put_super(). But generic_shutdown_super()
only calls ->put_super() from inside the if (sb->s_root) branch, so
nothing releases it when bm_fill_super() fails:
- The kzalloc_obj() failure leaves s_root NULL and the whole branch is
skipped.
- A simple_fill_super() failure in the file loop leaves s_root set, but
s_op still points at simple_super_operations, which has no
->put_super(). bm_fill_super() installs s_ops only once
simple_fill_super() returned success, and installing it earlier
wouldn't help either because simple_fill_super() overwrites s_op.
Either way vfs_get_super() calls deactivate_locked_super() and the
reference is gone for good. binfmt_misc mounts are available in a user
namespace and both the inode and the dentry cache are SLAB_ACCOUNT, so
an unprivileged caller under a tight memory cgroup can fail
simple_fill_super() on demand and leak one user namespace per attempt.
Drop the reference in ->kill_sb() instead, which runs unconditionally,
the same way nfsd and rpc_pipefs release their keyed s_fs_info.
That also stops ->put_super() from clearing s_fs_info while the
superblock is still on @fs_supers. generic_shutdown_super() leaves it
there on purpose so that sget_fc() keeps finding it until kill_sb() has
run, but a NULL s_fs_info makes test_keyed_super() miss it, so a
concurrent mount for the same user namespace skips the grab_super()
wait and creates a second superblock for a namespace that is still
being torn down.
Fixes: 21ca59b365c0 ("binfmt_misc: enable sandboxed mounts")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>
---
Note for stable: this applies as-is only from v6.19 onwards. Before
7beafd51c4e1 ("convert binfmt_misc") ->kill_sb is kill_litter_super()
and bm_kill_sb() has to call that instead of kill_anon_super(): back
then simple_fill_super() left the dentries it created pinned and
d_genocide() is what drops them. Taking this patch verbatim on v6.7 to
v6.18 turns every binfmt_misc umount into a "Dentry still in use"
BUG() in shrink_dcache_for_umount().
---
fs/binfmt_misc.c | 32 +++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/binfmt_misc.c b/fs/binfmt_misc.c
index a73a37b8a013..c97f10b48b5b 100644
--- a/fs/binfmt_misc.c
+++ b/fs/binfmt_misc.c
@@ -921,18 +921,9 @@ static const struct file_operations bm_status_operations = {
/* Superblock handling */
-static void bm_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
-{
- struct user_namespace *user_ns = sb->s_fs_info;
-
- sb->s_fs_info = NULL;
- put_user_ns(user_ns);
-}
-
static const struct super_operations s_ops = {
.statfs = simple_statfs,
.evict_inode = bm_evict_inode,
- .put_super = bm_put_super,
};
static int bm_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc)
@@ -990,13 +981,12 @@ static int bm_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc)
/*
* When the binfmt_misc superblock for this userns is shutdown
* ->enabled might have been set to false and we don't reinitialize
- * ->enabled again in put_super() as someone might already be mounting
- * binfmt_misc again. It also would be pointless since by the time
- * ->put_super() is called we know that the binary type list for this
- * bintfmt_misc mount is empty making load_misc_binary() return
- * -ENOEXEC independent of whether ->enabled is true. Instead, if
- * someone mounts binfmt_misc for the first time or again we simply
- * reset ->enabled to true.
+ * ->enabled again during shutdown as someone might already be mounting
+ * binfmt_misc again. It also would be pointless since by then we know
+ * that the binary type list for this binfmt_misc mount is empty making
+ * load_misc_binary() return -ENOEXEC independent of whether ->enabled
+ * is true. Instead, if someone mounts binfmt_misc for the first time or
+ * again we simply reset ->enabled to true.
*/
misc->enabled = true;
@@ -1022,6 +1012,14 @@ static const struct fs_context_operations bm_context_ops = {
.get_tree = bm_get_tree,
};
+static void bm_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+ struct user_namespace *user_ns = sb->s_fs_info;
+
+ kill_anon_super(sb);
+ put_user_ns(user_ns);
+}
+
static int bm_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc)
{
fc->ops = &bm_context_ops;
@@ -1038,7 +1036,7 @@ static struct file_system_type bm_fs_type = {
.name = "binfmt_misc",
.init_fs_context = bm_init_fs_context,
.fs_flags = FS_USERNS_MOUNT,
- .kill_sb = kill_anon_super,
+ .kill_sb = bm_kill_sb,
};
MODULE_ALIAS_FS("binfmt_misc");
---
base-commit: 61d2304c0f286fe4a14ec6cee87588350c276d02
change-id: 20260728-work-binfmt_misc-usernsleak-c224e596beba
next reply other threads:[~2026-07-28 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 13:48 Christian Brauner [this message]
2026-08-09 22:37 ` [PATCH] binfmt_misc: don't leak the user namespace when the mount fails patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260728-work-binfmt_misc-usernsleak-v1-1-dbd8d5e626e7@kernel.org \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=farid.m.zakaria@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mail@johnericson.me \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox