From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13C91435535; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 14:27:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785248879; cv=none; b=axFl5JwiKOgpHuWemn6kMpuHOhUXAky+t3peQ/PBQ/RO1+75Zqnjbk3wZVSFdPsLopc7pq9oU+naunl1UbrVpKUVvajgavoJ0rBsoKRIxKScHfpGB372EeaDVg4fDARij08pcl2Qu6MShabRhMDRMJpjt2xtkSp7kK/lAQ+GNng= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785248879; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rBvNqNavzbrrcbT2nZJt/thsxq3mPh0j+0mjEtTQk2I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Oj1LvOgoqlKglPiwmXa4XJEpmhDcY4ZV7VQiiYz41iIwFk5zHvfCXhihfsOQdV2hLrjoskbzZ6B0OD+XzGhRJjkxuRxiDDyuncynDDjauQeThAfbs3Di3hI4oWE97p7I7SZ/FI4UpIzJfamV2VLj7vzSVUv3WgEYcJVnMVIIwRQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jl21fUpQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jl21fUpQ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 404761F000E9; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 14:27:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785248877; bh=ipPVpKqDsUNPrwwl0/LqgIlIDX4NZ+f3Dn1SHjvbxLU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=jl21fUpQ9TLOIa90lgXJhTcM9ZnGL6RLSJFDOOnggmhSieefvX4ru1EerT+kIcsfW Jg8xIie9e8BA9f72djNqWrkWjrtU/futoXGB7lurzYiHySGoplgN4kV4c7EDoAHzTa RLRlyCGgcjFlkaqFG7mv8iFqAIR9+m2XxaINcT3TPONLCNLXK2yTqLOijLx7A8OXhx Mv2UhFkaJdHdCMgnJOKt6YM24HtkwlZjzxdyFWw62as3Llm3vAwFPTYdXFgl3xtbKZ fJ3fT/pvfIqh3Dz9+SaR9ZfcNtpUA/ARTatxh4zCtFrr+5x0ADDOmS31Y8my1tzGwE QdG3dBgIT6JsQ== Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 07:27:56 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Carlos Maiolino , Theodore Tso , "Darrick J. Wong" , Joanne Koong , changfengnan@bytedance.com, Christian Brauner , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: selective Sashiko replies, was: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iomap: decouple simple direct I/O reads from iomap_dio_rw Message-ID: <20260728072756.7ddc9fdd@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260728040120.GA19400@lst.de> References: <20260722124931.3159664-1-hch@lst.de> <20260722124931.3159664-3-hch@lst.de> <20260723045347.GA6641@lst.de> <20260723151021.GC7380@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20260728040120.GA19400@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 28 Jul 2026 06:01:20 +0200 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > IIRC the discussion we had a while back was to keep the reviews emailed > > to authors only... > > > > Now I wonder how feasible would be to have a "linux-xfs-review" list to > > send sashiko reviews to, then people opt-in to it? Would it be overkill? > > The main problem is that reducing the recipient list for replies is > incredibly stupid. +1, maybe perhaps someone wants the off-list option, dunno. But trimming the CC list of the on-list reply is a really weird idea. Submissions often CC multiple vger lists, and the bot only replies to one.