From: Tao Yu <tao1.yu@intel.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: slava@dubeyko.com, glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de,
frank.li@vivo.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+2bf21610eea63cb2ce93@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
Tao Yu <tao1.yu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] hfs/hfsplus: harden btree node 0 bitmap corruption handling
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 10:31:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814023150.3482810-1-tao1.yu@intel.com> (raw)
Hi,
This series addresses btree bitmap corruption around node 0 in HFS and
HFS+.
Node 0 is the reserved btree header node. If the on-disk bitmap ever
presents node 0 as free, the filesystem is already corrupted and should
not continue normal allocation from that state.
The series does two things:
1. Port the existing HFS+ style mount-time node 0 bitmap validation to
HFS, so HFS detects the corrupted btree map earlier and forces the
filesystem read-only.
2. Harden the HFS and HFS+ btree allocators so that attempts to
allocate node 0 are treated as bitmap corruption. Instead of
continuing into the reserved header node and later tripping the
"new node 0 already hashed?" warning, the allocator now emits a
repair hint, forces the filesystem read-only, and aborts the
allocation.
This keeps the existing warning as a last-resort invariant check, while
moving the actual corruption handling to earlier and more appropriate
control points.
Patch 1 ports the mount-time validation to HFS.
Patch 2 adds the runtime allocator guard to both HFS and HFS+.
Comments are welcome.
Tao Yu (2):
hfs: detect node 0 btree map corruption at mount time
hfs/hfsplus: stop btree allocators from reusing node 0
fs/hfs/btree.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/hfsplus/btree.c | 11 +++++++
2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)
Thanks,
Tao
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-08-14 2:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-14 2:31 Tao Yu [this message]
2026-08-14 2:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] hfs: detect node 0 btree map corruption at mount time Tao Yu
2026-08-14 4:10 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-08-14 2:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] hfs/hfsplus: stop btree allocators from reusing node 0 Tao Yu
2026-08-14 4:19 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260814023150.3482810-1-tao1.yu@intel.com \
--to=tao1.yu@intel.com \
--cc=frank.li@vivo.com \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=slava@dubeyko.com \
--cc=syzbot+2bf21610eea63cb2ce93@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox