From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: rppt@kernel.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, baohua@kernel.org,
dev.jain@arm.com, hughd@google.com, jannh@google.com,
jgg@ziepe.ca, jhubbard@nvidia.com, corbet@lwn.net,
liam@infradead.org, ljs@kernel.org, mhiramat@kernel.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, mhocko@suse.com,
muchun.song@linux.dev, nico.pache@linux.dev, osalvador@suse.de,
pfalcato@suse.de, peterx@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, surenb@google.com, usama.arif@linux.dev,
vbabka@kernel.org, ziy@nvidia.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] userfaultfd: collapse VM_UFFD_{MISSING,WP,MINOR,RWP} into single VM_UFFD
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 15:11:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260824071126.41979-1-lance.yang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260823-uffd-vm-flags-v1-v1-6-3086981b33cf@kernel.org>
On Sun, Aug 23, 2026 at 03:17:43PM +0300, Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) wrote:
[...]
>diff --git a/mm/userfaultfd.c b/mm/userfaultfd.c
>index 83587d34b189..193f6e65d875 100644
>--- a/mm/userfaultfd.c
>+++ b/mm/userfaultfd.c
>@@ -50,10 +50,10 @@ struct mfill_state {
> pmd_t *pmd;
> };
>
>-static bool anon_can_userfault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, vm_flags_t vm_flags)
>+static bool anon_can_userfault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned int mode)
> {
> /* anonymous memory does not support MINOR mode */
>- if (vm_flags & VM_UFFD_MINOR)
>+ if (mode & UFFD_MODE_MINOR)
> return false;
> return true;
> }
>@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ static int mfill_copy_folio_locked(struct folio *folio, unsigned long src_addr)
> }
>
> #define MFILL_RETRY_STATE_VMA_FLAGS \
>- append_vma_flags(__VMA_UFFD_FLAGS, VMA_SHARED_BIT)
>+ append_vma_flags(VMA_UFFD, VMA_SHARED_BIT)
Looks like this drops registration mode from the retry snapshot. Assume a
shared shmem VMA is registered for MISSING and COPY reaches
mfill_copy_folio_retry(). While locks are dropped, the same userfaultfd|
can re-register the range for MINOR. VMA_UFFD, VM_SHARED, ops, file and
pgoff all stay unchanged, so the old COPY can continue instead of
returning -EAGAIN ... no?
The snapshot and comparison bracket the unlocked copy:
static int mfill_copy_folio_retry(struct mfill_state *mfill_state,
struct folio *folio)
{
...
mfill_retry_state_save(&retry_state, mfill_state->vma);
/* retry copying with mm_lock dropped */
mfill_put_vma(mfill_state);
...
/* reget VMA and PMD, they could change underneath us */
err = mfill_get_vma(mfill_state);
if (err)
return err;
if (mfill_retry_state_changed(&retry_state, mfill_state->vma))
return -EAGAIN;
...
}
Since mode now lives in vm_uffd_state.mode, could we save it before
mfill_put_vma() and compare it after mfill_get_vma()? The UFFD flags
comment also needs an update, since the mask no longer contains per mode
flags.
Maybe something like this?
---8<---
diff --git a/mm/userfaultfd.c b/mm/userfaultfd.c
index 193f6e65d875..5e3c86fe8aee 100644
--- a/mm/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/mm/userfaultfd.c
@@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ static bool mfill_retry_state_changed(struct mfill_retry_state *state,
vma_flags_t flags = vma_flags_and_mask(&vma->flags,
MFILL_RETRY_STATE_VMA_FLAGS);
- /* Have any UFFD flags (missing, WP, minor) changed? */
+ /* Has UFFD registration or VMA sharing changed? */
if (!vma_flags_same_pair(&state->flags, &flags))
return true;
@@ -528,6 +528,7 @@ static int mfill_copy_folio_retry(struct mfill_state *mfill_state,
struct mfill_retry_state retry_state = { 0 };
struct mfill_retry_state *for_free __free(retry_put) = &retry_state;
unsigned long src_addr = mfill_state->src_addr;
+ unsigned int saved_mode = uffd_mode(mfill_state->vma);
void *kaddr;
int err;
@@ -549,7 +550,8 @@ static int mfill_copy_folio_retry(struct mfill_state *mfill_state,
if (err)
return err;
- if (mfill_retry_state_changed(&retry_state, mfill_state->vma))
+ if (saved_mode != uffd_mode(mfill_state->vma) ||
+ mfill_retry_state_changed(&retry_state, mfill_state->vma))
return -EAGAIN;
err = mfill_establish_pmd(mfill_state);
---
Cheers, Lance
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-24 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-23 12:17 [PATCH 0/6] userfaultfd: decouple uffd mode from VMA flags Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-08-23 12:17 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm/gup: move gup_can_follow_protnone() to gup.c Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-08-23 21:03 ` Barry Song
2026-08-24 14:42 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-24 14:59 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-25 2:03 ` Zi Yan
2026-08-23 12:17 ` [PATCH 2/6] userfaultfd: constify VMA parameter of userfaultfd_*() helpers Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-08-23 21:03 ` Barry Song
2026-08-24 15:03 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-25 2:03 ` Zi Yan
2026-08-23 12:17 ` [PATCH 3/6] userfaultfd: use userfaultfd_*() helpers instead of open coded flag tests Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-08-23 21:14 ` Barry Song
2026-08-24 15:10 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-23 12:17 ` [PATCH 4/6] userfaultfd: rename vm_userfaultfd_ctx to vm_uffd_state Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-08-24 14:43 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-24 15:42 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-23 12:17 ` [PATCH 5/6] userfaultfd: decouple fault reason from VMA flags Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-08-24 8:12 ` Muchun Song
2026-08-24 14:46 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-24 16:28 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-23 12:17 ` [PATCH 6/6] userfaultfd: collapse VM_UFFD_{MISSING,WP,MINOR,RWP} into single VM_UFFD Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-08-24 7:11 ` Lance Yang [this message]
2026-08-24 8:17 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-08-24 8:27 ` Lance Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260824071126.41979-1-lance.yang@linux.dev \
--to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=nico.pache@linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox