Linux filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org, Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devpts: reject max=0 instead of silently lifting the limit
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 06:33:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026090337-crowbar-unable-24b0@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903033625.1042796-1-cui.tao@linux.dev>

On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 11:36:25AM +0800, Tao Cui wrote:
> From: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
> 
> mount_opts.max == 0 is consumed as ida_alloc_max(..., max - 1), which
> wraps to 0xffffffff.  The IDA layer treats a negative max as INT_MAX,
> so "mount -t devpts -o max=0" does not disable ptys - it lifts the
> per-instance limit entirely and only the global kernel.pty.max still
> applies.
> 
> Reject the value at parse time:
> 
>   $ mount -t devpts -o max=0 pt /tmp/pt
>   mount: /tmp/pt: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock...
> 
> No userspace relies on 0 meaning "unlimited": runc and crun never
> set max=, and LXC, the only runtime that does, omits the property
> entirely when the configured value is 0.
> 
> The value has never been validated since the option was introduced,
> so there is no Fixes tag.

Shouldn't the Fixes tag be where the option was introduced?

Anyway, not all that big of a deal as this is a root-only thing.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-03  4:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-03  3:36 [PATCH] devpts: reject max=0 instead of silently lifting the limit Tao Cui
2026-09-03  4:33 ` Greg KH [this message]
2026-09-04 10:57 ` Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2026090337-crowbar-unable-24b0@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cui.tao@linux.dev \
    --cc=cuitao@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox