From: NeilBrown <neilb@ownmail.net>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/7 RFC] fixes for vfs_lookup_open, and integration with nfsd
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 10:20:46 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260910002934.192979-1-neilb@ownmail.net> (raw)
I've been looking at the problems Chuck and Jeff found with my
vfs_lookup_open() work for opening files in nfsd and think the following
patches address the issues.
I have labeled this an RFC because:
1/ Patch 2/7 changes user-visible behaviour - in a good way I think.
Currently O_NONBLOCK avoids waiting for a leases but doesn't
avoid waiting for a directory delegation. I think it should do both.
2/ vfs_lookup_open() is changed to update the 'dentry' in the path arg
to report what was found. On success this is identical to the
returned file->f_path.dentry. On -EFTYPE failure it is useful
to report the actual type to the NFS client as required.
As an aside - what would people think of changing ->atomic_open
functions to *not* return -EFTYPE. If they find a non-regular file they
should use finish_no_open() and let the caller decide if a non-regular
is an error. ->atomic_open can still honour O_DIRECTORY if a network
filesystem does that some special way, but if it find a non-regular when
O_DIRECTORY wasn't requested, it is best to report what it found and let
others deal with it. As it is we need an extra d_lookup() in
vfs_lookup_open() to find the dentry that ->atomic_open refused to
return.
Or maybe we shouldn't pass __O_REGULAR because that only affects "open",
and lookup_open() doesn't even try to open non-regular files.
I'm keen to read your thoughts on the above.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
[PATCH 1/7] vfs: add some allowed open flags to vfs_lookup_open()
[PATCH 2/7] vfs: O_NONBLOCK|O_CREAT open shouldn't wait for directory
[PATCH 3/7] vfs: vfs_lookup_open() should only return -EFTYPE for
[PATCH 4/7] vfs: change vfs_lookup_open() to return found dentry in
[PATCH 5/7] nfsd: switch NFS4 OPEN to use vfs_lookup_open()
[PATCH 6/7] nfsd: nfsd_check_obj_isreg() to use nfs error codes.
[PATCH 7/7] nfsd: use vfs_lookup_open() for non-creating open
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 0:20 NeilBrown [this message]
2026-09-10 0:20 ` [PATCH 1/7] vfs: add some allowed open flags to vfs_lookup_open() NeilBrown
2026-09-10 0:20 ` [PATCH 2/7] vfs: O_NONBLOCK|O_CREAT open shouldn't wait for directory delegation NeilBrown
2026-09-10 0:20 ` [PATCH 3/7] vfs: vfs_lookup_open() should only return -EFTYPE for non-regular files NeilBrown
2026-09-10 0:20 ` [PATCH 4/7] vfs: change vfs_lookup_open() to return found dentry in path.dentry NeilBrown
2026-09-10 0:39 ` NeilBrown
2026-09-10 15:13 ` Chuck Lever
2026-09-10 0:20 ` [PATCH 5/7] nfsd: switch NFS4 OPEN to use vfs_lookup_open() NeilBrown
2026-09-10 15:41 ` Chuck Lever
2026-09-10 0:20 ` [PATCH 6/7] nfsd: nfsd_check_obj_isreg() to use nfs error codes NeilBrown
2026-09-10 0:20 ` [PATCH 7/7] nfsd: use vfs_lookup_open() for non-creating open requests too NeilBrown
2026-09-10 15:47 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260910002934.192979-1-neilb@ownmail.net \
--to=neilb@ownmail.net \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox