From: Salvatore Dipietro <dipiets@amazon.it>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <hch@infradead.org>, <abuehaze@amazon.com>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <alisaidi@amazon.com>,
<blakgeof@amazon.com>, <brauner@kernel.org>, <dgc@kernel.org>,
<dipietro.salvatore@gmail.com>, <dipiets@amazon.it>,
<djwong@kernel.org>, <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, <jackmanb@google.com>,
<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>, <mhocko@suse.com>,
<ritesh.list@gmail.com>, <rvvandan@amazon.com>,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>, <surenb@google.com>,
<vbabka@kernel.org>, <willy@infradead.org>, <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v5] mm/page_alloc: avoid direct compaction for costly __GFP_NORETRY allocations
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 14:21:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260911142102.2294202-1-dipiets@amazon.it> (raw)
Commit 5d8edfb900d5 ("iomap: Copy larger chunks from userspace")
introduced high-order folio allocations in the iomap buffered write
path. When memory is fragmented, each failed costly-order allocation
enters __alloc_pages_slowpath() which runs direct compaction and
drain_all_pages(), causing a 0.38x throughput drop on PostgreSQL
pgbench (simple-update) with 1024 clients on a 96-vCPU arm64 system.
The root issue is that direct compaction is too expensive for hot
allocation paths that have fallbacks to smaller allocations.
__filemap_get_folio_mpol() already marks higher-order allocations with
__GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN, signalling that the caller can handle
failure. However, the page allocator still attempts full direct
compaction for costly orders with __GFP_NORETRY, which is unnecessarily
aggressive when the caller will simply retry at a lower order.
For costly-order allocations with __GFP_NORETRY, suppress direct reclaim
for the whole slowpath by computing can_direct_reclaim (and hence
can_compact) as false. The !can_direct_reclaim check near the top of
the slowpath then short-circuits to nopage: no direct reclaim, no direct
compaction and no drain_all_pages() IPI across every CPU. kswapd (and
in turn kcompactd) is still woken further down for background
defragmentation, so compaction keeps working for long-term system health
while being removed from the latency-critical direct allocation path.
Allocations that also request __GFP_THISNODE are exempted. That flag
pairing identifies the local-node-first THP attempt issued by
alloc_pages_mpol() (mempolicy.c), which relies on direct compaction to
form transparent huge pages. __GFP_NOFAIL is exempted as well, so a
must-not-fail allocation is never made to fail.
Test environment:
Hardware: AWS EC2 m8g.24xlarge (96 vCPU, arm64)
12x 1TB IO2 32000 IOPS RAID0 XFS
OS: AL2023
Kernel: v7.3-rc1
Database: PostgreSQL 18.4
Workload: pgbench simple-update, 1024 clients, 96 threads, 1200s
Results (average of 3 runs, TPS):
Config Avg TPS % vs baseline
AL2023 stock 6.1 kernel (pre-5d8edfb900d5) 136,942 n/a
v7.3-rc1 baseline (no patch) 59,408 -
v7.3-rc1 + this patch 161,994 +172.7%
The patch fully recovers the pre-5d8edfb900d5 performance, bringing
throughput back above the pre-regression level and well clear of the
~59k baseline. The AL2023 6.1 row runs a kernel that predates commit
5d8edfb900d5 ("iomap: Copy larger chunks from userspace"), so it is not
directly comparable, but it shows the pre-regression level and confirms
that the ~59k baseline is the anomaly and not the norm.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260403193535.9970-1-dipiets@amazon.it/T/#t [v1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260420161404.642-1-dipiets@amazon.it/T/#u [v2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260710143437.12379-1-dipiets@amazon.it/T/#u [v3]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260904115629.3993331-1-dipiets@amazon.it/T/#u [v4]
Fixes: 5d8edfb900d5 ("iomap: Copy larger chunks from userspace")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Dave Chinner <dgc@kernel.org>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Salvatore Dipietro <dipiets@amazon.it>
---
v5: Derive the decision into a local flag instead of mutating gfp_mask
v4: Clear __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM early in the slowpath and exempt
__GFP_THISNODE so THP attempt keeps using direct compaction
v3: Move to mm/page_alloc.c, wake kcompactd instead of avoiding it
v2: Move from fs/iomap/buffered-io.c to mm/filemap.c
v1: Avoid compaction in iomap folio allocation
mm/page_alloc.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 12fac9084c48..be8b0d72a2db 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -4784,10 +4784,22 @@ static inline struct page *
__alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
struct alloc_context *ac)
{
- bool can_direct_reclaim = gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
+ const bool costly_order = order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER;
+ /*
+ * Costly __GFP_NORETRY callers have a cheap fallback to a lower order,
+ * so don't stall them in direct reclaim or direct compaction. Exempt
+ * __GFP_THISNODE (the THP attempt from alloc_pages_mpol() needs direct
+ * compaction) and __GFP_NOFAIL (must not be made to fail). Don't
+ * clear __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM from gfp_mask instead: that would also
+ * change the alloc_flags derived by alloc_flags_slowpath().
+ */
+ const bool costly_noretry = costly_order &&
+ (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY) &&
+ !(gfp_mask & (__GFP_THISNODE | __GFP_NOFAIL));
+ bool can_direct_reclaim = !costly_noretry &&
+ (gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM);
bool can_compact = can_direct_reclaim && gfp_compaction_allowed(gfp_mask);
bool nofail = gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL;
- const bool costly_order = order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER;
struct page *page = NULL;
unsigned int alloc_flags;
unsigned long did_some_progress;
--
2.50.1
AMAZON DEVELOPMENT CENTER ITALY SRL, viale Monte Grappa 3/5, 20124 Milano, Italia, Registro delle Imprese di Milano Monza Brianza Lodi REA n. 2504859, Capitale Sociale: 10.000 EUR i.v., Cod. Fisc. e P.IVA 10100050961, Societa con Socio Unico
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-11 14:21 Salvatore Dipietro [this message]
2026-09-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v5] mm/page_alloc: avoid direct compaction for costly __GFP_NORETRY allocations Zi Yan
2026-09-11 16:32 ` Andrew Morton
2026-09-11 20:44 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260911142102.2294202-1-dipiets@amazon.it \
--to=dipiets@amazon.it \
--cc=abuehaze@amazon.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alisaidi@amazon.com \
--cc=blakgeof@amazon.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=brendan.jackman@linux.dev \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dgc@kernel.org \
--cc=dipietro.salvatore@gmail.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=rvvandan@amazon.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox